Sara Smilansky’s 4 Types of Play and Sociodramatic Play Theory

A Comprehensive Guide to Sara Smilansky: Play Development, Theory and Practice

Play shapes learning. This simple perspective drove Sara Smilansky to conduct detailed research into how different types of play influence child development. Her work provides Early Years practitioners with practical tools for understanding and supporting children’s play.

Why Smilansky Matters Today

Early Years settings face increasing pressure to demonstrate how play supports learning. Smilansky’s research offers clear guidance for identifying, assessing and supporting different types of play. Her collaboration with Jean Piaget expanded existing play theories, while her focus on Sociodramatic Play revealed links between play patterns and later academic success.

Her work addresses key questions in Early Years practice:

• How do different types of play support learning?
• What role do adults take in children’s play?
• How does cultural background influence play development?
• What makes play intervention effective?

Practical Applications

Smilansky’s theories translate directly into practice. Her detailed criteria for assessing sociodramatic play help practitioners observe and document children’s development. Her intervention strategies provide clear frameworks for supporting children who need additional help with play skills.

This comprehensive guide explores:

• The 4 types of play and their development
• 6 criteria for assessing sociodramatic play
• Practical intervention strategies
• Cultural influences on play
• Contemporary applications of Smilansky’s work

Whether you’re an Early Years practitioner looking to enhance your practice or a student exploring play theory, this guide unpacks Smilansky’s contribution to our understanding of how children learn through play.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction and Background to Sara Smilansky’s Work

Play shapes children’s learning. This fundamental stance drove Sara Smilansky’s research into how different types of play influence child development. Her work in the 1960s established clear connections between sociodramatic play and children’s cognitive, social, and emotional growth.

Significance and Contribution

Sara Smilansky (1922-2006) contributed to our understanding of play in Early Years education. Her research provided Early Years practitioners with practical guidance for understanding, assessing and supporting children’s play development. Her collaboration with Jean Piaget expanded existing play theories and created new approaches to play-based learning (Cohen, 1993).

Early Life and Career

Born in Jerusalem in 1922, Smilansky witnessed first-hand the impact of cultural and socioeconomic differences on children’s development. She became a professor at Tel Aviv University and served as senior researcher at The Henrietta Szold Institute’s Ruth Bressler Center for Educational Research. Her work as visiting professor at several American universities, including the University of Maryland, broadened her research across different cultural contexts.

Historical Context

Smilansky conducted her research during the 1960s, when Early Years education was gaining recognition as a distinct field. Her 1968 study on Sociodramatic Play in disadvantaged children challenged existing assumptions about play development. The study demonstrated that play patterns varied significantly between socioeconomic groups, with implications for children’s later academic success (Smilansky, 1968).

Key Influences

Three main influences shaped Smilansky’s work:

• Jean Piaget’s theories of cognitive development and play categories
• Cultural observations of children from different socioeconomic backgrounds
• Educational inequality between advantaged and disadvantaged children

Core Concepts

Smilansky identified four fundamental types of play:

1. Functional Play: Sensory and physical exploration
2. Constructive Play: Creative use of materials
3. Dramatic Play: Individual and group pretend play
4. Games with Rules: Structured play with agreed rules

Her most significant contribution focused on Sociodramatic Play – complex pretend play involving multiple children. She established 6 essential criteria for well-developed sociodramatic play, including imitative role play, make-believe with objects, and verbal communication (Frost et al., 2001).

Smilansky’s research revealed that children from disadvantaged backgrounds often showed less developed sociodramatic play skills. This finding led to her development of play training interventions, demonstrating that targeted support could improve children’s play abilities and subsequent learning outcomes (Smilansky & Shefatya, 1990).

Her work continues to influence Early Years practice today, providing practitioners with clear frameworks for understanding play development and supporting children’s learning through play-based interventions.

Sara Smilansky’s Key Concepts and Theories

Smilansky’s research established clear frameworks for understanding children’s play development. Her work expanded Piaget’s original play categories and provided practical tools for Early Years practitioners to assess and support children’s play development.

The 4 Types of Play

Smilansky identified four distinct types of play that emerge as children develop. Each type builds upon previous experiences and supports different aspects of learning and development.

1. Functional Play

Definition: The earliest form of play, beginning in infancy, where children explore objects and their environment using their senses and physical abilities.

Functional play involves children’s natural exploration of their environment through repetitive actions and sensory investigation. Children engage in simple actions like dropping objects to understand cause and effect, or repeatedly filling and emptying containers to master motor skills. Through this type of play, children develop their understanding of how objects behave and how their own bodies work. This foundational play supports physical development, sensory processing, and early cognitive skills.

Identification of Stage:

• Development of fine and gross motor skills
• Understanding of cause and effect
• Sensory processing abilities
• Physical confidence and coordination

2. Constructive Play

Definition: Goal-directed manipulation of objects to create something new.

In constructive play, children move beyond simple exploration to purposeful creation. They begin to plan and execute increasingly complex projects, from simple block towers to elaborate structures with multiple components. This type of play involves problem-solving as children figure out how materials work together. They learn through trial and error, developing persistence and creativity. Constructive play naturally incorporates mathematical concepts as children explore spatial relationships, patterns, and basic physics.

Identification of Stage:

• Spatial awareness
• Mathematical concepts
• Creative thinking
• Fine motor development
• Planning skills

3. Dramatic Play

Definition: Make-believe play where children take on roles and create imaginary scenarios.

Dramatic play represents a significant cognitive leap as children begin to use symbols and imagination. This type of play starts with simple imitation of familiar adults and grows into complex shared narratives. Children use objects symbolically, transform their identity through role-play, and create elaborate scenarios. When playing with others, dramatic play becomes sociodramatic play, adding layers of social negotiation and collaborative storytelling.

Identification of Stage:

• Symbolic thinking
• Language development
• Social skills
• Emotional understanding
• Narrative capabilities

4. Games with Rules

Definition: Structured play activities with predetermined rules and objectives.

The most sophisticated form of play involves understanding and following agreed-upon rules. Children learn to balance their desires with the constraints of game structures, whether playing board games or participating in sports. This type of play develops self-regulation, strategic thinking, and social understanding. Children learn to handle competition, practice fair play, and negotiate rule modifications with peers.

The 6 Criteria for Sociodramatic Play

Smilansky developed specific criteria for identifying well-developed Sociodramatic Play (Smilansky & Shefatya, 1990). These criteria provide a framework for observing and assessing children’s play development:

1. Imitative Role Play
2. Make-believe with Objects
3. Verbal Make-believe
4. Play Persistence
5. Interaction
6. Verbal Communication

Imitative role play forms the foundation of sociodramatic play, where children adopt and maintain specific characters, often inspired by their real-life experiences. They demonstrate understanding of social roles through appropriate actions and language. Make-believe with objects shows children’s ability to use symbolic thinking, transforming everyday items into props that serve their play narrative. A stick becomes a sword, or a box transforms into a spaceship.

Verbal make-believe demonstrates children’s ability to create and sustain imaginary scenarios through language. Children describe invisible elements, narrate their actions, and build complex storylines. Play persistence indicates maturity in play development, as children maintain their roles and scenarios for extended periods, often returning to and building upon previous play themes.

Interaction and verbal communication represent the social aspects of sociodramatic play. Children negotiate roles, respond to others’ ideas, and coordinate multiple perspectives to create shared narratives. This complex social dance requires sophisticated communication skills and emotional understanding.

Play Training and Intervention

Smilansky’s intervention approaches focus on enhancing children’s play abilities through structured support. Outside-in intervention involves adults actively demonstrating play behaviours and providing specific suggestions to enhance play scenarios. Practitioners model appropriate language, introduce new play possibilities, and demonstrate ways to extend existing play.

Inside play intervention takes a more immersive approach, with adults joining the play as participants. They take on characters within children’s scenarios, subtly guiding and extending the play while maintaining the children’s ownership of the narrative. This approach allows practitioners to support role development and encourage peer interaction from within the play framework.

Environmental support complements these direct interventions. Practitioners create rich play environments with appropriate props and materials, ensure sufficient time for play to develop, and organize spaces that support different types of play activities. Research shows that this comprehensive approach to play support particularly benefits children from disadvantaged backgrounds (Cohen, 1993).

Developmental Progression

Smilansky’s research showed that play development follows a predictable pattern but is influenced by environmental factors:

Early Stage (0-2 years):

• Predominantly functional play
• Beginning of constructive play
• Limited symbolic understanding

Middle Stage (2-4 years):

• Increased constructive play
• Emergence of dramatic play
• Beginning of rule understanding

Later Stage (4-6 years):

• Complex sociodramatic play
• Sophisticated rule games
• Integration of multiple play types

Research showed significant differences in play development between socioeconomic groups, leading to Smilansky’s emphasis on play training and intervention (Cohen, 1993). Her work demonstrated that targeted support could improve children’s play skills and subsequent learning outcomes.

Sara Smilansky’s Contributions to the Field of Education and Child Development

Impact on Educational Practices

Smilansky’s research enhanced our understanding of how play contributes to learning in Early Years settings. Her work provided evidence for connections between Sociodramatic Play and academic development, influencing Early Years practice.

Key Practical Changes:

Role-play areas became more common in Early Years settings following Smilansky’s research. Her studies showed that well-equipped dramatic play spaces support children’s development of language and social skills (Frost et al., 2001). Settings often provide:

• Themed role-play areas with regular changes
• Real-life props and open-ended materials
• Time for uninterrupted play
• Adult support during play activities

Her research on play training contributed to how practitioners interact with children during play. Many practitioners now combine supervision with targeted support for play development (Smilansky & Shefatya, 1990).

Influencing our Understanding of Child Development

Cultural and Socioeconomic Considerations

Smilansky’s research identified differences in play patterns between socioeconomic groups. Her studies of Israeli children from European versus North African and Middle Eastern backgrounds showed variations in play complexity and language use (Cohen, 1993).

Key Findings:

• Children from advantaged backgrounds often showed more complex play scenarios
• Some disadvantaged children displayed less developed Sociodramatic Play skills
• Cultural backgrounds influenced play patterns and preferences
• Environmental factors played a role in play development

These findings contributed to how Early Years settings support children from different backgrounds. Many settings now consider:

• Cultural representation in play resources
• Support for home languages in play
• Parent engagement in understanding play patterns
• Additional support for children who need it

Language Development Through Sociodramatic Play

Smilansky’s work helped establish links between Sociodramatic Play and language development. Her research indicated that children engaged in complex pretend play often:

• Used more complex sentences
• Showed broader vocabulary use
• Developed narrative skills
• Improved peer communication

Relevance to Contemporary Education

Smilansky’s theories contribute to modern Early Years practice. Current research continues to explore her ideas, particularly in addressing contemporary challenges.

Digital Age Applications

Modern practitioners adapt Smilansky’s principles when supporting play in digital contexts. Research by Johnson and Christie (2009) explores how her theories relate to modern play:

• Documenting play through technology
• Including digital props in sociodramatic play
• Supporting digital storytelling
• Developing play-based digital literacy

Supporting Inclusive Practice

Smilansky’s work on play intervention offers useful approaches for supporting children with additional needs:

• Adapting play environments
• Using play to support language development
• Encouraging social inclusion through play
• Developing individual play support

Impact on Assessment Practices

Her 6 criteria for Sociodramatic Play contribute to Early Years observation and assessment. Practitioners often use these criteria to:

• Observe children’s play development
• Identify areas for support
• Plan interventions
• Record progress

Current Research Applications

Researchers continue to explore themes from Smilansky’s work. Recent studies examine:

• Play and executive function skills
• Sociodramatic play and emotional regulation
• Play-based learning and school readiness
• Cultural aspects of play in diverse communities

Smilansky’s emphasis on observation and intervention remains useful as settings work to support children’s play experiences, including during periods of disruption like the recent pandemic.

Criticisms and Limitations of Sara Smilansky’s Theories and Concepts

Smilansky’s work on play development and intervention has contributed valuable insights to Early Years practice. However, several researchers have identified limitations and areas requiring further investigation. Understanding these critiques helps practitioners apply her theories more effectively.

Research Method Limitations

The main methodological critiques of Smilansky’s work include:

• Sample Size Concerns: Her initial studies focused on relatively small groups of Israeli children, raising questions about broader applicability.
• Cultural Context: The original research concentrated primarily on specific cultural groups within Israel, potentially limiting its generalisability to other cultural contexts.
• Observation Methods: Some researchers question the reliability of the observational techniques used to assess play behaviour, particularly in identifying complex sociodramatic play elements.

Theoretical Challenges

Several key theoretical criticisms have emerged:

• Fixed Stage Progression: Critics argue that Smilansky’s four types of play present development as too linear.
• Environmental Focus: Some researchers suggest Smilansky overemphasised environmental factors while underestimating individual differences in play preferences and abilities.
• Intervention Approach: Questions exist about the long-term effectiveness of structured play intervention.

Cultural and Contextual Considerations

Research has identified several contextual limitations:

• Cultural Bias: The original research reflected specific Middle Eastern and European cultural contexts, potentially overlooking different cultural approaches to play.
• Socioeconomic Assumptions: Some critics argue that Smilansky’s definition of ‘disadvantaged’ reflected particular cultural and historical contexts that may not apply universally.
• Modern Context: Questions exist about how digital play and modern childhood experiences fit within Smilansky’s framework.

Practical Implementation Challenges

Early Years practitioners report several implementation challenges:

• Resource Requirements: Providing rich sociodramatic play environments requires significant space and materials, which some settings find challenging.
• Time Constraints: The emphasis on extended play periods conflicts with increasing pressures for structured learning activities.
• Assessment Complexity: Practitioners sometimes find it difficult to apply the six criteria for sociodramatic play consistently in busy settings.

Addressing the Limitations

Current practice adapts Smilansky’s work to address these limitations:

Flexible Application:

• Combining Smilansky’s framework with other play theories
• Adapting observation criteria to local contexts
• Incorporating digital and modern play experiences

Cultural Responsiveness:

• Including diverse cultural perspectives in play provision
• Recognising different cultural approaches to play
• Supporting varied play styles and preferences

Assessment Approaches:

• Using multiple observation methods
• Considering individual differences
• Including parent and child perspectives

The critiques of Smilansky’s work do not diminish its value but highlight areas for consideration when applying her theories in practice. Understanding these limitations helps practitioners develop more nuanced and effective approaches to supporting children’s play development.

Practical Applications of Sara Smilansky’s Work

Smilansky’s theories provide clear frameworks for supporting children’s play development in Early Years settings. This section explores practical ways to implement her ideas, focusing on observation, environment creation, and targeted interventions.

Assessment and Observation Techniques

Early Years practitioners need systematic approaches to observe and assess children’s play development. Smilansky’s 6 criteria for Sociodramatic Play provide a robust framework for observation. Practitioners record key elements of play behaviour through running records, focusing on the length of play episodes, social interactions, and language complexity.

Key observation areas include:

• Type and complexity of play demonstrated
• Social interactions and language use
• Role maintenance and prop utilisation
• Length and depth of play episodes

Detailed observations help practitioners identify areas for support and track children’s progress. Video recordings prove particularly useful for analysing complex play scenarios, while play mapping tracks social interactions and play patterns across the setting.

Creating Supportive Play Environments

The physical environment plays a crucial role in supporting different types of play. Well-designed spaces encourage children to explore all four of Smilansky’s play types naturally throughout their day. Each area requires careful consideration of resources, space, and accessibility.

Functional play needs rich sensory experiences through varied materials and textures. Sand, water, and dough provide opportunities for cause-and-effect exploration. Movement spaces allow children to develop physical skills through active play.

Constructive play flourishes when children access open-ended materials. Block play areas become more effective when they include varied materials and adequate space for complex constructions. Art and craft resources support creative exploration and problem-solving.

Dramatic play areas need flexibility to support different scenarios. A well-equipped home corner provides a foundation, but practitioners should regularly adapt spaces to reflect children’s interests and experiences. Cultural resources and open-ended props extend play possibilities.

Supporting Play Development

Smilansky’s theory emphasises the importance of sensitive adult intervention in play. Practitioners observing carefully before joining play, following children’s lead while looking for opportunities to extend learning would be one method of implementing Smilansky’s methodology. Children may then model new vocabulary within play contexts and demonstrate different ways to use materials.

Supporting disadvantaged children requires particular attention to language development. Small group play allows for focused support, while extended play periods give children time to develop complex scenarios. Explicit play modelling helps children who have limited play experiences develop new skills.

Working with Families

Parent engagement strengthens play development across home and setting environments. Regular communication about children’s play helps parents understand its importance in learning and development. Practitioners share observations and celebrate progress, while suggesting ways to support play at home.

Family involvement enriches the setting’s play provision. Parents contribute cultural perspectives on play and share traditional games or stories. Take-home play packs extend learning opportunities, while documentation helps track progress across both environments.

Overcoming Implementation Challenges

Settings often face practical constraints when implementing Smilansky’s approaches. Limited resources require creative solutions, such as using open-ended materials and creating multi-purpose spaces. Time pressures ease through flexible routines and efficient observation methods.

Even small changes to play provision may create significant benefits. Settings successfully could adapt Smilansky’s framework by:

• Creating flexible, multi-use spaces
• Using natural and recycled materials
• Integrating play throughout daily routines
• Developing efficient observation systems

Regular monitoring helps settings refine their approach. Practitioners track children’s engagement, language development, and social interactions to ensure their provision effectively supports all children’s play development.

This practical application of Smilansky’s theories helps settings create rich play environments that support children’s holistic development while addressing the realities of different contexts and resources.

Comparing Smilansky’s Ideas with Other Theorists

Understanding how Smilansky’s theories relate to other key thinkers helps practitioners develop a comprehensive approach to supporting play development. This section explores connections between Smilansky’s work and that of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner.

Comparison with Jean Piaget

Smilansky’s collaboration with Piaget significantly influenced her understanding of play development. Both theorists emphasise the staged progression of play abilities and view play as crucial for cognitive development.

Key similarities include:

• Recognition of developmental stages
• Focus on children’s active learning
• Emphasis on symbolic understanding
• View of play as developmental indicator

Their approaches differ in several areas. Where Piaget focuses primarily on cognitive aspects of play, Smilansky emphasises its social and cultural dimensions. Her research extends Piaget’s work by adding constructive play as a distinct category and exploring socioeconomic influences on play development (Cohen, 1993).
Read our in-depth article on Jean Piaget here.

Comparison with Lev Vygotsky

Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory shares several important elements with Smilansky’s approach to play development. Both emphasise the social nature of learning and the importance of adult support in extending children’s capabilities.

Smilansky’s play intervention strategies align with Vygotsky’s concept of the Zone of Proximal Development. Both theorists recognise that children achieve higher levels of play complexity when supported by more experienced partners. However, they differ in their emphasis on environmental factors.

Their perspectives diverge in several areas:

• Role of cultural tools in development
• Function of private speech
• Nature of developmental progression

Smilansky focuses more specifically on play types and their development, while Vygotsky considers play within a broader theory of learning and development.
Read our in-depth article on Lev Vygotsky here.

Comparison with Jerome Bruner

Bruner’s theory of scaffolding complements Smilansky’s approach to play intervention. Both emphasise the importance of adult support in extending children’s learning through play. Bruner’s modes of representation parallel Smilansky’s understanding of how children use objects and symbols in play.

Their approaches share several common elements:

• Recognition of adult role in learning
• Importance of language development
• Value of symbolic understanding
• Progressive skill development

However, Bruner takes a broader view of cognitive development, while Smilansky focuses specifically on play development and its social implications.
Read our in-depth article on Jerome Bruner here.

Synthesis and Practical Implementation

Understanding these theoretical connections helps practitioners develop comprehensive approaches to supporting play. For example:

1. Smilansky’s detailed framework for observing and assessing different play types combines effectively with Vygotsky’s emphasis on social learning.
2. Her intervention strategies align with Bruner’s scaffolding techniques, particularly in supporting dramatic play development.
3. The focus on sociodramatic play complements Piaget’s understanding of symbolic development.

Practical Implications

Understanding these theoretical relationships helps practitioners:

• Design comprehensive play environments
• Plan effective interventions
• Support diverse learning needs
• Assess play development

Each theorist’s unique perspective contributes to a deeper understanding of play development. Smilansky’s specific focus on play types and intervention provides practical frameworks that complement the broader developmental theories of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner.

The complementary nature of these theories provides practitioners with rich resources for supporting children’s play development. Each theorist contributes unique insights while sharing common ground in recognising play’s crucial role in early learning.

Sara Smilansky’s Legacy and Ongoing Influence

Sara Smilansky’s collaboration with Piaget and her subsequent research into play development continues to influence Early Years practice. Her expansion of Piaget’s play categories and focus on sociodramatic play provides practical frameworks for understanding children’s development through play.

Impact on Play Theory and Research

Smilansky’s work with Piaget led to developments in play theory. While Piaget identified three categories of play – practice play, symbolic play, and games with rules – Smilansky added constructive play as a distinct category. This addition highlighted the importance of goal-directed manipulation of materials in children’s development (Cohen, 1993).

Key theoretical contributions include:

• Extension of Piaget’s play categories
• Development of sociodramatic play criteria
• Focus on cultural influences in play
• Links between play and academic success

Influence on Early Years Practice

Smilansky’s detailed framework for assessing sociodramatic play appears in many current Early Years observation systems. Her six criteria for sociodramatic play provide practitioners with clear indicators for observing and supporting children’s play development (Smilansky & Shefatya, 1990).

The emphasis on play intervention strategies continues to guide practice in Early Years settings. Settings commonly use her approaches when:

• Creating play environments
• Supporting disadvantaged children
• Developing language through play
• Planning targeted interventions

Cultural and Socioeconomic Considerations

Smilansky’s research on play patterns among children from different cultural backgrounds remains relevant. Her findings about the impact of socioeconomic factors on play development inform current approaches to supporting diverse communities in Early Years settings.

Her work demonstrates that:

• Environmental factors influence play development
• Cultural background affects play patterns
• Targeted support enhances play skills
• Play intervention benefits all children

Current Applications

Modern Early Years practice continues to draw on Smilansky’s ideas, particularly in:

Assessment:

• Observation frameworks
• Play development tracking
• Language assessment
• Social skills monitoring

Environment Design:

• Play area organisation
• Resource selection
• Space utilisation
• Cultural representation

Future Directions

Current Early Years practice builds on Smilansky’s foundation while addressing contemporary challenges. Her emphasis on observation and intervention provides frameworks for supporting children’s play in modern contexts, including:

• Digital play environments
• Diverse cultural settings
• Mixed-age groupings
• Inclusive practice

The enduring relevance of Smilansky’s work lies in its practical application. Her detailed criteria for assessing play development and clear intervention strategies continue to support practitioners in promoting children’s learning through play.

Her collaboration with Piaget and subsequent development of play theory demonstrates how theoretical understanding can translate into practical support for children’s development. This bridge between theory and practice remains a significant aspect of her legacy in Early Years education.

Conclusion: The Impact of Sara Smilansky’s Work

Sara Smilansky’s research into play development provides Early Years practitioners with practical frameworks for supporting children’s learning. Her collaboration with Piaget expanded our understanding of play types, while her work on sociodramatic play highlighted the importance of cultural and environmental factors in children’s development.

Key contributions include:

• 4 distinct types of play development
• The 6 criteria for assessing sociodramatic play
• Play intervention strategies
• Cultural perspectives on play development

Practical Applications for Early Years Settings

Smilansky’s theories translate directly into Early Years practice. Her detailed observation criteria help practitioners assess and support children’s play development, while her intervention strategies provide clear frameworks for enhancing play experiences.

Implementation focuses on:

• Creating rich play environments
• Supporting disadvantaged children
• Developing language through play
• Engaging families in play development

Critical Engagement with Theory

Effective implementation of Smilansky’s ideas requires thoughtful adaptation to different contexts. Her work provides foundations for understanding play development while acknowledging the influence of cultural and environmental factors.

Practitioners benefit from:

• Regular observation of play patterns
• Reflection on intervention strategies
• Adaptation to local contexts
• Integration with other approaches

Moving Forward

Smilansky’s emphasis on systematic observation and targeted support continues to guide Early Years practice. Her work demonstrates how theoretical understanding translates into practical strategies for supporting children’s development through play.

Early Years settings achieve best results when they:

• Use clear observation frameworks
• Plan targeted interventions
• Consider cultural contexts
• Support all play types

The enduring value of Smilansky’s work lies in its practical application. Her detailed criteria for assessing play development and clear intervention strategies provide Early Years practitioners with tools to support every child’s play journey.

Frequently Asked Questions About Sara Smilansky’s Work

What Is Smilansky’s Theory of Play?

Smilansky’s theory identifies four distinct, sequential types of play essential for child development. These comprise functional play (physical and sensory exploration), constructive play (creating with materials), dramatic play (make-believe and role play), and games with rules. Her theory emphasises how each type emerges naturally and supports different aspects of learning, with particular emphasis on sociodramatic play for cognitive and social development.

What Are Smilansky’s Six Criteria for Sociodramatic Play?

Smilansky developed six interconnected criteria for identifying well-developed sociodramatic play: imitative role play, make-believe with objects, verbal make-believe, play persistence, interaction between players, and verbal communication. These criteria work together to create complex play scenarios that support children’s development. Practitioners use these criteria to assess play quality and plan appropriate support (Smilansky & Shefatya, 1990).

How Does Smilansky’s Work Differ from Piaget’s Play Theory?

While Smilansky built upon Piaget’s foundational work, she expanded his theory in several important ways. She added constructive play as a distinct category and placed greater emphasis on sociocultural influences. Her work focuses more specifically on practical applications in Early Years settings, including detailed intervention strategies for supporting play development.

What Evidence Supports Play Intervention for Disadvantaged Children?

Smilansky’s research demonstrates that children from disadvantaged backgrounds often display less developed sociodramatic play skills, but benefit significantly from targeted intervention. Her studies show improvements in language development, social interaction, play complexity, and overall learning outcomes when children receive appropriate play support.

How Can Settings Support All Four Types of Play with Limited Resources?

Settings can effectively support all play types through careful resource management. Use open-ended materials that serve multiple play purposes, rotate resources between areas, and create flexible spaces adaptable for different play scenarios. Involve children in creating and adapting play props to extend play opportunities within resource constraints.

What Role Should Adults Take in Children’s Sociodramatic Play?

Adults support sociodramatic play most effectively through careful observation and sensitive intervention. Join play at children’s invitation, model new possibilities within existing scenarios, and support language development through play. Avoid directing play but maintain presence as a supportive play partner when invited.

How Does Sociodramatic Play Support Language Development?

Sociodramatic play naturally enhances language development through meaningful social interactions. Children engage in extended conversations in role, negotiate with play partners, develop complex narratives, and expand their vocabulary in authentic contexts. This type of play creates natural opportunities for rich language use and development.

What Are the Signs That a Child Needs Additional Play Support?

Children who need additional play support typically show limited engagement in sociodramatic play, brief play episodes, and simple or repetitive play patterns. They might demonstrate minimal social interaction during play and limited use of language. Early identification through careful observation helps practitioners provide appropriate support.

How Can Settings Track Play Development Effectively?

Settings track play development through systematic observation using Smilansky’s framework. Regular documentation of play episodes, noting progression through play types, changes in play complexity, and language use during play provides valuable insight into children’s development. Use the six criteria as observation guidelines for consistent assessment.

What Impact Does Cultural Background Have on Play Development?

Cultural background significantly influences play development patterns. Smilansky’s research reveals that play patterns vary between cultural groups, with home experiences and cultural values affecting play choices. While play intervention benefits all cultural groups, settings need culturally responsive approaches to support play development effectively.

References

• Cohen, D. (1993). The development of play (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
• Frost, J. L., Wortham, S. C., & Reifel, S. (2001). Play and child development. Upper Saddle Valley, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Johnson, J. E., & Christie, J. F. (2009). Play and digital technology. In C. Glenn, P. Knight, J. Holt, & L. Wendy (Eds.), Digital play and development (pp. 122-140). Sage Publications.
• Smilansky, S. (1968). The effects of sociodramatic play on disadvantaged preschool children. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Smilansky, S., & Shefatya, L. (1990). Facilitating play: A medium for promoting cognitive, socio-emotional and academic development in young children. Gaithersburg, MD: Psychosocial & Educational Publications.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Fromberg, D. P. (2002). Play and meaning in early childhood education. Allyn & Bacon.
• Frost, J. L. (1992). Play and playscapes. Delmar Publishers Inc.
• Haight, W. L., & Miller, P. J. (1993). Sociodramatic play in a cultural context. State University of New York Press.
• Waite-Stupiansky, S. (1997). Building understanding together: A constructivist approach to early childhood education. Delmar Publishers.

Recommended Books

• Smilansky, S. (1968). The effects of sociodramatic play on disadvantaged preschool children. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Original research detailing Smilansky’s groundbreaking study of play patterns and intervention strategies
• Smilansky, S., & Shefatya, L. (1990). Facilitating play: A medium for promoting cognitive, socio-emotional and academic development in young children. Psychosocial & Educational Publications.
  • Comprehensive guide to supporting play development in Early Years settings
• Smilansky, S. (1988). Clay in the classroom: Helping children develop cognitive and affective skills for learning. Psychosocial & Educational Publications.
  • Practical applications of play theory using clay as a medium for learning
• Smilansky, S., & Klugman, E. (1990). Children’s play and learning: Perspectives and policy implications. Teachers College Press.
  • Exploration of play theory’s implications for educational policy and practice

Recommended Websites

• The Henrietta Szold Institute
  • Access to research papers and historical documents related to Smilansky’s work
  • Archive of Early Years research from Israel
• ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) Found at: https://eric.ed.gov/
  • Collection of Smilansky’s published papers
  • Related research on play development and intervention
• National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)
  • Professional resources on play-based learning
  • Practical guides for implementing play theory
• Early Childhood Research Quarterly Found at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/early-childhood-research-quarterly
  • Access to peer-reviewed articles on play development
  • Contemporary research building on Smilansky’s work
• Play Wales
  • Resources for supporting play development
  • Practical implementation guides for settings

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

To cite this article use:

Early Years TV Sara Smilansky’s 4 Types of Play and Sociodramatic Play Theory. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/sara-smilanskys-4-types-of-play-and-sociodramatic-play/ (Accessed: 11 December 2024).

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile