Jerome Bruner on Child Development: Modes of Representation, Scaffolding, Discovery Learning, and Spiral Curriculum

A Comprehensive Guide for Early Years Professionals and Students

Jerome Bruner, a prominent educational theorist, revolutionised our understanding of child development and learning. His ideas continue to shape modern Early Years education practices worldwide. For professionals and students in early childhood education, Bruner’s work provides essential insights into how children learn and develop.

Bruner introduced several key concepts that remain central to Early Years education:

• Scaffolding: A teaching strategy used for supporting learners as they develop new skills.
• Discovery Learning: An educational approach that promotes active exploration and problem-solving.
• Spiral Curriculum: A curriculum design method that involves revisiting concepts at increasing levels of complexity.
• Three Modes of Representation: A theory describing how children represent and understand the world through action, imagery, and language.

These ideas offer practical strategies for promoting children’s cognitive, social, and emotional development. They inform curriculum design, classroom management, and family engagement in Early Years settings.

This comprehensive guide explores:

1. Bruner’s life and influences
2. His key theories and their evolution
3. Practical applications in Early Years settings
4. Comparisons with other theorists
5. Critiques and limitations of his work
6. Ongoing relevance and future directions

Bruner’s theories have a significant effect on Early Years education. His work influences our understanding of child development and shapes modern educational practices. Whether you’re an experienced practitioner or a student entering the field, this article provides valuable insights into Bruner’s enduring impact on Early Years education.

Read on to deepen your understanding of Bruner’s theories and enhance your practice in supporting young children’s learning and development.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction and Background to Jerome Bruner’s Work

Jerome Bruner revolutionised our understanding of cognitive development and learning in children. His theories reshaped educational practices and continue to influence Early Years education today.

This article explores Bruner’s key concepts, their practical applications, and their enduring impact on child development and educational theory.

Early Life and Career

Jerome Seymour Bruner was born on 1 October 1915 in New York City. He overcame early visual impairment to pursue a distinguished academic career. Bruner earned his doctorate from Harvard University in 1941, where he later became a professor of psychology.

Key points:

• Born: 1 October 1915, New York City
• Education: PhD from Harvard University, 1941
• Career: Professor of Psychology at Harvard University

Bruner’s work in intelligence during World War II shaped his interest in perception and cognition (Bruner, 1983). He received numerous awards, including the Distinguished Scientific Award from the American Psychological Association in 1962 and the CIBA Gold Medal for Distinguished Research in 1993.

Historical Context

Bruner’s work emerged during a significant shift in psychology and education:

• 1950s-1960s: Transition from behaviourism to cognitive psychology
• Growing interest in child cognition, influenced by Jean Piaget’s stage theory
• Cold War era focus on science and mathematics education in the West

The prevailing educational practices of the time emphasised rote learning and behavioural conditioning. Bruner challenged these approaches, advocating for a more active, learner-centred model of education.

Key Influences

Bruner’s thinking was shaped by several key influences:

• Jean Piaget’s stage theory of cognitive development
• Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of cognitive development
• Gestalt psychology’s emphasis on perception and problem-solving

These influences are evident in Bruner’s focus on the role of social interaction in learning and his emphasis on the importance of structure in educational content (Bruner, 1960).

Main Concepts and Theories

Bruner is known for several influential concepts and theories:

1. Three modes of representation:

• Enactive (action-based)
• Iconic (image-based)
• Symbolic (language-based)

1. The spiral curriculum: Revisiting basic ideas repeatedly, building upon them into more complex concepts over time.
2. Discovery learning: Students actively participate in the learning process, discovering relationships and concepts for themselves.
3. Scaffolding: Providing support to learners, gradually reducing assistance as they become more competent.

These ideas significantly contributed to our understanding of how children learn and develop cognitively. They emphasise the active role of the learner and the importance of structuring educational experiences to match the learner’s cognitive development (Bruner, 1966).

Bruner’s theories continue to shape Early Years education, influencing how educators approach curriculum design, instruction, and assessment.

Jerome Bruner’s Key Concepts and Theories

Jerome Bruner developed several influential theories that have significantly shaped our understanding of child development and learning. His work emphasises the active role of the learner, the importance of social interaction, and the need for structured educational experiences. These ideas continue to influence Early Years education, curriculum design, and instructional practices.

Bruner’s Three Modes of Representation

Bruner (1966) proposed that children progress through three modes of representation as they develop cognitively. These modes describe how information is stored and encoded in memory. Unlike Piaget’s stages, Bruner’s modes are not strictly age-dependent and can coexist throughout development.

• Enactive representation (action-based):
  • This mode is predominant from birth to approximately one year of age. Knowledge is stored primarily as motor responses, and learning occurs through direct manipulation of objects. Thinking is based entirely on physical actions.
  • Example: An infant learns to use a rattle by grasping, shaking, and hearing the sound it produces. Even as adults, we often rely on this mode for tasks like typing or riding a bicycle, which are difficult to describe verbally but are stored as muscle memory.
• Iconic representation (image-based):
  • Emerging around one to six years of age, this mode involves storing information as sensory images or mental pictures. Children can visualise objects and scenarios without physical interaction, allowing for more flexible thinking.
  • Example: A four-year-old child can draw a simple house from memory, representing their mental image of a house. In adults, this mode is evident when we use diagrams or illustrations to understand complex information.
• Symbolic representation (language-based):
  • Developing from around seven years onwards, this mode involves representing knowledge through symbols, primarily language. It enables abstract thinking and complex problem-solving, freeing the individual from the constraints of immediate perception.
  • Example: A seven-year-old can understand and use the word “democracy” without needing a concrete visual representation. Adults use this mode when engaging in abstract reasoning or using mathematical symbols to solve equations.

Bruner emphasised that these modes are not mutually exclusive but integrate and translate into each other as cognitive development progresses. This theory suggests that educational materials should be adapted to match a child’s current mode of representation, facilitating more effective learning (Wood et al., 1976).

In Early Years settings, educators can apply this theory by providing hands-on activities for younger children (enactive), incorporating visual aids for older preschoolers (iconic), and gradually introducing more abstract concepts through language as children approach school age (symbolic).

The Spiral Curriculum

Bruner (1960) introduced the concept of the spiral curriculum, which proposes that complex ideas can be taught at a simplified level first and then revisited at more complex levels later. Key features include:

• Repeated exposure to subjects over time
• Gradual increase in difficulty and complexity
• Building upon existing knowledge
• Reinforcement of previously learned concepts

Example: In mathematics, children might start with simple counting, progress to addition and subtraction, and later revisit these concepts in the context of algebra.

Significance: The spiral curriculum allows for a more intuitive and gradual learning process, reinforcing understanding over time.

Discovery Learning

Bruner advocated for discovery learning, where students actively participate in the learning process by exploring and manipulating objects, performing experiments, or engaging in trial and error (Bruner, 1961). Key aspects include:

• Learners construct their own knowledge
• Emphasis on problem-solving and critical thinking
• Teachers act as facilitators rather than direct instructors
• Learning through exploration and experimentation

Example: Instead of being told about plant growth, children might plant seeds and observe their development over time.

Significance: Discovery learning promotes deeper understanding, better retention of information, and development of critical thinking skills.

Scaffolding

While not originally coined by Bruner, the concept of scaffolding is closely associated with his work (Wood et al., 1976). Scaffolding involves:

• Providing support to learners during the learning process
• Gradually reducing assistance as learners become more competent
• Tailoring support to individual learner needs
• Encouraging independence and self-directed learning

Example: An Early Years educator might initially help a child hold a pencil correctly, then gradually reduce physical guidance as the child’s fine motor skills improve.

Significance: Scaffolding enables learners to achieve tasks beyond their unassisted abilities, promoting cognitive development and independence.

Relationships Between Concepts and Theories

Bruner’s theories are interconnected and complementary:

• The three modes of representation inform how the spiral curriculum should be structured at different ages.
• Discovery learning aligns with the active, constructivist approach implied by the modes of representation.
• Scaffolding supports discovery learning by providing appropriate levels of assistance.

Together, these theories emphasise the importance of active, structured learning experiences that are tailored to a child’s developmental level and gradually increase in complexity.

Developmental Progression

While Bruner didn’t propose rigid developmental stages like Piaget, his theories imply a progression in cognitive abilities:

1. Early sensorimotor stage:

• Corresponds to enactive representation
• Learning through physical interaction with the environment
• Focus on developing basic motor skills and sensory understanding

1. Perceptual and imagery stage:

• Aligns with iconic representation
• Development of mental imagery and visual thinking
• Increased ability to understand and use symbols

1. Symbolic and abstract thinking stage:

• Matches symbolic representation
• Advanced language use and abstract reasoning
• Capacity for complex problem-solving and hypothetical thinking

Bruner emphasised that this progression is not strictly age-dependent and can vary based on individual differences and cultural factors (Bruner, 1966).

Bruner’s theories provide a comprehensive framework for understanding cognitive development and learning in children. They emphasise the active role of the learner, the importance of structured educational experiences, and the need for tailored support throughout the learning process. These ideas continue to shape Early Years education and inform best practices in teaching and curriculum design.

Jerome Bruner’s Contributions to the Field of Education and Child Development

Impact on Educational Practices

Bruner’s theories have significantly influenced educational practices, particularly in Early Years settings. His ideas have led to notable changes in teaching methods and curriculum design.

Discovery learning has transformed classroom dynamics. Teachers now often act as facilitators rather than lecturers. For example, in a Year 1 science class studying plant growth, children might plant seeds and observe their development over time, rather than simply being told about the process. This hands-on approach encourages active engagement and critical thinking (Bruner, 1961).

The concept of the spiral curriculum has reshaped how subjects are taught across multiple years. In mathematics education, for instance, basic counting in Reception year progresses to addition and subtraction in Year 1, then to multiplication and division in later years. This approach allows for the reinforcement and expansion of concepts over time (Bruner, 1960).

Scaffolding, while not originally coined by Bruner, has become a cornerstone of modern teaching practice. In an Early Years setting, an educator might initially help a child hold scissors correctly, gradually reducing assistance as the child’s fine motor skills improve. This approach supports children in achieving tasks beyond their unassisted abilities (Wood et al., 1976).

Shaping our Understanding of Child Development

Bruner’s work has deepened our understanding of cognitive development in children. His three modes of representation theory has provided insights into how children process and store information at different stages of development.

In cognitive development, Bruner’s work highlighted the importance of language in shaping thought. This has led to increased emphasis on language-rich environments in Early Years settings. For example, educators now consciously narrate their actions and encourage children to verbalise their thoughts during play and problem-solving activities (Bruner, 1983).

Bruner’s theories have also influenced our understanding of social and cultural factors in learning. His later work emphasised the role of culture in shaping cognitive development, leading to more culturally sensitive and inclusive educational practices (Bruner, 1996).

The concept of readiness for learning has been reshaped by Bruner’s assertion that any subject can be taught effectively to any child at any stage of development if presented appropriately. This has encouraged educators to introduce complex concepts earlier, using age-appropriate methods (Bruner, 1960).

Relevance to Contemporary Education

Bruner’s ideas remain highly relevant in contemporary education. His emphasis on active, discovery-based learning aligns well with current trends in educational technology and personalised learning.

Digital learning platforms often incorporate principles of discovery learning and the spiral curriculum. For instance, educational apps for young children frequently use game-like interfaces that allow for exploration and repeated exposure to concepts at increasing levels of difficulty (Hirsh-Pasek et al., 2015).

The concept of scaffolding has been adapted for use in inclusive education practices. For children with special educational needs, educators now commonly use graduated support systems, inspired by Bruner’s ideas, to help these children access the curriculum (Mitchell, 2014).

Recent research has built upon Bruner’s theories. For example, studies on cognitive load theory have expanded our understanding of how to structure information for optimal learning, complementing Bruner’s ideas on the importance of appropriate presentation of material (Sweller et al., 2019).

Bruner’s emphasis on the cultural context of learning remains crucial in our increasingly diverse classrooms. Educators now strive to create culturally responsive learning environments that acknowledge and value the diverse backgrounds of their students (Gay, 2018).

In addressing current challenges in education, such as remote learning necessitated by global events, Bruner’s theories continue to provide valuable insights. The principles of discovery learning and scaffolding have been adapted for online environments, helping to maintain engaging and effective learning experiences for children in diverse settings (Waller et al., 2021).

Bruner’s contributions have left an indelible mark on educational theory and practice. His ideas continue to shape how we understand child development and approach teaching and learning in the 21st century.

Criticisms and Limitations of Jerome Bruner’s Theories and Concepts

Jerome Bruner’s work has significantly influenced child development and education. However, his theories have faced criticisms and limitations. This section examines the main areas of critique, including research methods, key concepts, and contextual considerations. Understanding these criticisms provides a more comprehensive view of Bruner’s ideas and their application in Early Years settings.

Criticisms of Research Methods

• Limited empirical evidence: Some critics argue that Bruner’s theories lack substantial empirical support. His work often relied on observational studies and theoretical reasoning rather than large-scale experimental research (Egan, 2002).
• Lack of diversity in study participants: Bruner’s research primarily involved Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) populations. This limitation raises questions about the generalisability of his findings to diverse cultural contexts (Henrich et al., 2010).
• Subjective interpretation: Critics suggest that Bruner’s interpretations of child behaviour and learning processes may have been influenced by his own cultural biases and preconceptions (Rogoff, 2003).

Challenges to Key Concepts or Theories

• Oversimplification of cognitive development: Some researchers argue that Bruner’s three modes of representation (enactive, iconic, symbolic) oversimplify the complex nature of cognitive development. Children may use multiple modes simultaneously or switch between them flexibly (Goswami, 2008).
• Limitations of discovery learning: Critics contend that pure discovery learning can be inefficient and may not suit all learners. Some studies suggest that guided instruction can be more effective, especially for novice learners (Kirschner et al., 2006).
• Overemphasis on language: Bruner’s focus on language as a primary tool for cognitive development has been criticised for potentially undervaluing other forms of representation and communication, particularly in early childhood (Edwards et al., 1998).

Contextual and Cultural Limitations

• Cultural specificity: Bruner’s theories have been criticised for not fully accounting for cultural variations in learning and development. His work primarily reflects Western educational values and practices (Rogoff, 2003).
• Socioeconomic factors: Critics argue that Bruner’s theories do not adequately address the impact of socioeconomic factors on learning and development. Children from disadvantaged backgrounds may face barriers to engaging in discovery learning or accessing rich language environments (Reese et al., 2010).
• Historical context: Some researchers suggest that Bruner’s theories reflect the historical context of his time and may not fully align with contemporary educational needs and challenges (Takaya, 2008).

Addressing the Criticisms and Limitations in Practice

Despite these criticisms, Bruner’s work continues to offer valuable insights into child development and learning. Early Years professionals can address these limitations by:

• Adopting a flexible approach: Educators should view Bruner’s theories as guidelines rather than rigid rules. Adapting his ideas to suit individual children’s needs and cultural contexts enhances their effectiveness.
• Incorporating diverse perspectives: Combining Bruner’s ideas with other theoretical frameworks, such as Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory, provides a more comprehensive understanding of child development (Wood & Attfield, 2005).
• Promoting guided discovery: Balancing discovery learning with appropriate scaffolding and guidance can enhance its effectiveness for diverse learners (Hmelo-Silver et al., 2007).
• Considering cultural context: Early Years professionals should adapt Bruner’s concepts to reflect the cultural backgrounds and experiences of the children in their care. This approach ensures more inclusive and culturally responsive practice (Gay, 2018).
• Addressing socioeconomic factors: Educators can work to create rich learning environments that support discovery and language development for all children, regardless of their socioeconomic background (Hoff, 2013).

By critically engaging with Bruner’s theories and addressing their limitations, Early Years professionals can harness the strengths of his ideas while ensuring their practice remains responsive to the diverse needs of contemporary children and families.

Practical Applications of Jerome Bruner’s Work

Translating Bruner’s theories into practical strategies enhances learning experiences in Early Years settings. This section explores applications in curriculum design, classroom management, and family engagement. Implementing Bruner’s ideas promotes children’s cognitive, social, and emotional development.

Application in Curriculum and Lesson Planning

• Spiral curriculum implementation: Design activities that revisit concepts at increasing levels of complexity. For example, introduce basic shapes through physical objects (enactive), progress to drawing shapes (iconic), and later explore geometric properties (symbolic) (Bruner, 1960).
• Discovery learning opportunities: Create open-ended activities that encourage exploration. Set up a ‘sink or float’ experiment station where children predict, test, and observe various objects’ buoyancy (Bruner, 1961).
• Scaffolded learning experiences: Provide graduated support in activities. For instance, in a writing task, offer hand-over-hand guidance initially, then transition to verbal prompts, and finally encourage independent writing (Wood et al., 1976).
• Multi-modal representation: Incorporate activities that engage different representational modes. For a ‘seasons’ theme, use sensory play (enactive), create artwork (iconic), and discuss seasonal changes (symbolic) (Bruner, 1966).

Strategies for Classroom Management and Interaction

• Language-rich environment: Narrate daily activities and encourage children to verbalise their thoughts. This supports the development of symbolic representation (Bruner, 1983).
• Culturally responsive practice: Incorporate diverse cultural elements in learning materials and activities. This aligns with Bruner’s later emphasis on the cultural context of learning (Bruner, 1996).
• Scaffolded social interactions: Guide children’s peer interactions, gradually reducing support as they develop social skills. This applies scaffolding principles to social-emotional development (Wood et al., 1976).
• Problem-solving approach: Encourage children to find solutions to classroom conflicts, providing support as needed. This fosters critical thinking skills aligned with discovery learning principles (Bruner, 1961).

Engaging Families and Communities

• Sharing learning processes: Communicate with families about their child’s learning journey, explaining concepts like the spiral curriculum. This helps parents understand and support their child’s development (Epstein, 2018).
• Home learning activities: Suggest activities that families can do at home to reinforce classroom learning. For example, provide a ‘discovery bag’ with items related to current themes for exploration at home (Bruner, 1961).
• Cultural knowledge exchange: Invite families to share their cultural knowledge and experiences. This enriches the learning environment and supports Bruner’s ideas on the cultural context of learning (Bruner, 1996).
• Parent workshops: Organise sessions to introduce parents to key concepts from Bruner’s theories and demonstrate how these are applied in the classroom. This fosters a shared understanding of educational approaches (Knopf & Swick, 2007).

Overcoming Challenges and Barriers to Implementation

• Resource constraints: Adapt Bruner’s ideas to fit available resources. For example, create a ‘discovery corner’ with everyday objects if specialised materials are unavailable (Egan, 2002).
• Time management: Integrate Bruner’s principles into existing routines. Incorporate scaffolding techniques during daily activities like snack time or outdoor play (Wood & Attfield, 2005).
• Balancing structure and discovery: Combine structured activities with free exploration periods. This addresses critiques of pure discovery learning while maintaining its benefits (Kirschner et al., 2006).
• Professional development: Engage in ongoing training and peer discussions to deepen understanding of Bruner’s theories and their practical applications. This supports effective implementation despite challenges (Sheridan et al., 2009).

Implementing Bruner’s ideas in Early Years settings requires creativity and flexibility. By adapting these strategies to their specific contexts, educators can create rich learning environments that support children’s cognitive, social, and emotional development. Regular reflection and adaptation ensure that these approaches remain effective and relevant in diverse Early Years settings.

Comparing Jerome Bruner’s Ideas with Other Theorists

Understanding how Bruner’s theories relate to other prominent child development theories provides a comprehensive view of the field. This section compares Bruner’s ideas with those of Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky, and Maria Montessori. Examining these comparisons deepens our understanding of child development and informs Early Years practice.

Comparison with Jean Piaget

Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, developed a stage theory of cognitive development that has significantly influenced early childhood education.

• Stages of development: Both Bruner and Piaget proposed stages of cognitive development. However, Piaget’s stages are more rigidly age-related, while Bruner’s modes of representation are more flexible and can coexist (Bruner, 1966; Piaget, 1952).
• Active learning: Both theorists emphasise the child’s active role in constructing knowledge. Piaget’s concept of ‘schemas’ aligns with Bruner’s idea that children actively organise and interpret information (Bruner, 1961; Piaget, 1952).
• Role of language: Bruner places greater emphasis on language as a tool for cognitive development, while Piaget views language as a product of cognitive development (Bruner, 1983; Piaget, 1952).
• Cultural influence: Bruner’s later work acknowledges the significant role of culture in cognitive development, an aspect less emphasised in Piaget’s theory (Bruner, 1996; Piaget, 1952).

Read our in-depth article on Jean Piaget here.

Comparison with Lev Vygotsky

Lev Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist, developed the sociocultural theory of cognitive development.

• Social interaction: Both Bruner and Vygotsky emphasise the importance of social interaction in cognitive development. Vygotsky’s concept of the ‘zone of proximal development’ aligns closely with Bruner’s idea of scaffolding (Bruner, 1978; Vygotsky, 1978).
• Cultural context: Vygotsky and Bruner both recognise the significant role of culture in shaping cognitive development, though Vygotsky places even greater emphasis on this aspect (Bruner, 1996; Vygotsky, 1978).
• Language development: Both theorists view language as a crucial tool for cognitive development. However, Vygotsky sees language as primarily a social tool, while Bruner emphasises its role in individual thought processes (Bruner, 1983; Vygotsky, 1986).
• Learning process: Bruner’s discovery learning approach differs from Vygotsky’s emphasis on guided participation, though both involve active engagement with the environment (Bruner, 1961; Vygotsky, 1978).

Read our in-depth article on Lev Vygotsky here.

Comparison with Maria Montessori

Maria Montessori, an Italian physician and educator, developed the Montessori method of education.

• Child-centred approach: Both Bruner and Montessori advocate for child-centred learning environments. However, Montessori places greater emphasis on self-directed learning, while Bruner acknowledges the role of adult guidance (Bruner, 1961; Montessori, 1912).
• Prepared environment: Montessori’s concept of the prepared environment aligns with Bruner’s idea that the learning environment should be structured to facilitate discovery and exploration (Bruner, 1961; Montessori, 1912).
• Sensory learning: Montessori emphasises sensory experiences in early learning, which aligns with Bruner’s enactive mode of representation (Bruner, 1966; Montessori, 1912).
• Developmental progression: Both theorists propose that children progress through different stages or modes of learning, though Montessori’s stages are more closely tied to specific age ranges (Bruner, 1966; Montessori, 1912).

Read our in-depth article on Maria Montessori here.

Synthesis and Implications for Practice

Understanding these comparisons enriches Early Years practice by allowing professionals to draw on multiple perspectives. For example:

• Combining Bruner’s scaffolding with Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development can inform effective adult-child interactions.
• Integrating Bruner’s discovery learning with Montessori’s prepared environment can create rich, exploratory learning spaces.
• Balancing Bruner’s emphasis on language with Piaget’s focus on hands-on experiences can provide a well-rounded approach to cognitive development.

Early Years professionals can create a more comprehensive and effective approach to supporting children’s development by synthesising these different perspectives.

Limitations and Challenges of Comparing Theorists

Comparing theorists presents challenges:

• Historical context: Each theorist worked in a specific historical and cultural context, which influenced their ideas and may limit direct comparisons.
• Evolving theories: Theories often evolve over time, making it important to consider the full scope of a theorist’s work rather than isolated concepts.
• Oversimplification: There is a risk of oversimplifying complex theories when making comparisons, potentially losing important nuances.
• Practical application: Theories may not always translate directly into practice, requiring careful consideration of how to apply theoretical comparisons in real-world settings.

Early Years professionals should approach these comparisons critically, recognising that no single theory fully explains the complexity of child development. A reflective, integrative approach that draws on multiple perspectives often proves most effective in supporting children’s learning and development.

Jerome Bruner’s Legacy and Ongoing Influence

Jerome Bruner’s contributions to child development and Early Years practice remain influential. His ideas continue to shape research, policy, and professional practice. Understanding Bruner’s legacy provides Early Years professionals and students with a foundation for interpreting contemporary approaches to education and child development.

Impact on Contemporary Research

• Cognitive development studies: Bruner’s work on representational systems has inspired research into how children develop and use different forms of mental representation. For example, Gopnik and Meltzoff’s (1997) studies on early concept formation build upon Bruner’s ideas about symbolic representation.
• Cultural psychology: Bruner’s later emphasis on the cultural context of learning has influenced cross-cultural studies of cognitive development. Rogoff’s (2003) research on cultural variations in learning processes draws on Bruner’s cultural approach to mind.
• Narrative and identity: Bruner’s work on the role of narrative in cognitive and identity development has sparked research into children’s storytelling and autobiographical memory. Nelson’s (2003) studies on young children’s event memories and narrative skills extend Bruner’s ideas about the importance of narrative in cognitive development.
• Educational neuroscience: Bruner’s theories have informed neuroscience research on learning and memory. Immordino-Yang’s (2016) work on the neurobiology of learning builds on Bruner’s ideas about the importance of active, meaningful learning experiences.

Influence on Educational Policy and Curriculum

• National curricula: Many national Early Years curricula incorporate elements of Bruner’s spiral curriculum. The English Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework, for instance, emphasises revisiting and extending learning over time (Department for Education, 2021).
• Discovery-based learning policies: Educational policies in various countries promote discovery-based learning approaches inspired by Bruner’s work. Singapore’s ‘Nurturing Early Learners’ framework emphasises inquiry-based learning in preschools (Ministry of Education, Singapore, 2013).
• Scaffolding in practice guidelines: Professional guidelines for Early Years educators often incorporate the concept of scaffolding. The Australian Early Years Learning Framework explicitly references scaffolding as a key practice (Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, 2009).
• Cultural responsiveness: Bruner’s emphasis on cultural context has influenced policies promoting culturally responsive education. New Zealand’s Te Whāriki curriculum framework, for example, emphasises the importance of cultural context in early learning (Ministry of Education, New Zealand, 2017).

Ongoing Relevance for Professional Practice

• Scaffolded instruction: Early Years educators continue to use scaffolding techniques in daily practice. For instance, a nursery teacher might provide graduated support as children learn to zip their coats, offering physical guidance initially and progressing to verbal prompts.
• Multi-modal learning experiences: Bruner’s modes of representation inform the design of learning activities. A teacher exploring the concept of ‘growth’ might use real plants (enactive), pictures of plant life cycles (iconic), and discussions about growth processes (symbolic).
• Cultural storytelling: Bruner’s ideas about narrative and culture influence storytelling practices in Early Years settings. Educators might encourage children to share stories from their cultural backgrounds, supporting both language development and cultural identity.
• Spiral curriculum in planning: Teachers often plan activities that revisit concepts at increasing levels of complexity. For example, exploring ‘shapes’ might progress from identifying basic shapes, to creating shape pictures, to discussing geometric properties.

Current Developments and Future Directions

• Digital learning applications: Researchers are exploring how Bruner’s theories apply to digital learning environments. Studies on educational apps and online learning platforms often draw on Bruner’s ideas about discovery learning and representation (Hirsh-Pasek et al., 2015).
• Neurodiversity considerations: There is growing interest in how Bruner’s theories can be adapted for neurodivergent learners. Future research might explore how scaffolding techniques can be tailored for children with diverse cognitive profiles.
• Global early childhood education: As early childhood education expands globally, researchers are examining how Bruner’s culturally-informed approach can be applied in diverse international contexts (Nsamenang, 2018).
• Interdisciplinary applications: Bruner’s ideas are being integrated with insights from other fields, such as cognitive neuroscience and environmental psychology, to develop more comprehensive approaches to Early Years education (Immordino-Yang et al., 2019).

While Bruner’s legacy is significant, ongoing critical engagement with his ideas is crucial. Early Years professionals are encouraged to reflect on how Bruner’s theories can be adapted and extended to meet the evolving needs of contemporary children and families. This critical and creative engagement ensures that Bruner’s insights continue to inform and enrich Early Years practice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How Does Bruner’s Theory Differ from Piaget’s?

Bruner’s theory differs from Piaget’s in several key aspects:

• Stages vs. Modes: Bruner proposed three modes of representation (enactive, iconic, symbolic) that are not strictly age-dependent, unlike Piaget’s fixed developmental stages (Bruner, 1966).
• Role of Language: Bruner emphasises language as a tool for cognitive development, while Piaget views it as a product of development (Bruner, 1983).
• Cultural Influence: Bruner places greater emphasis on the role of culture in shaping cognitive development (Bruner, 1996).
• Learning Process: Bruner advocates for discovery learning and scaffolding, concepts not central to Piaget’s theory (Bruner, 1961).

What is the ‘Spiral Curriculum’ and How Can It Be Implemented?

The spiral curriculum is a concept where subjects are revisited at increasing levels of complexity:

• It involves introducing basic ideas early and revisiting them repeatedly, each time building on previous knowledge.
• Implementation strategies include:
  1. Identifying core concepts in a subject area
  2. Introducing these concepts at a basic level
  3. Revisiting the concepts regularly, adding depth and complexity
  4. Connecting new learning to previously covered material

For example, in mathematics, children might start with simple counting, progress to addition, and later explore algebraic concepts, all building on the fundamental idea of number (Bruner, 1960).

How Can Bruner’s Theory Be Applied in Inclusive Education Settings?

Bruner’s theory can be adapted for inclusive education in several ways:

• Multiple Representations: Use diverse modes (enactive, iconic, symbolic) to present information, catering to different learning styles and needs.
• Scaffolding: Provide tailored support for each child, gradually reducing assistance as they gain competence.
• Discovery Learning: Create opportunities for hands-on, exploratory learning that can be adapted to various ability levels.
• Cultural Responsiveness: Incorporate diverse cultural perspectives and experiences into learning activities.

These approaches support individualised learning experiences, a key aspect of inclusive education (Mitchell, 2014).

What Role Does Play Have in Bruner’s Theory?

While not central to his theory, play aligns with several of Bruner’s key concepts:

• Discovery Learning: Play provides opportunities for children to explore and discover on their own.
• Representational Modes: Different types of play engage various modes of representation (e.g., physical play for enactive, pretend play for symbolic).
• Scaffolding: Adults can scaffold children’s play, supporting their learning and development.
• Cultural Context: Play often reflects and transmits cultural knowledge and practices.

Bruner viewed play as a means of developing problem-solving skills and understanding social roles (Bruner, 1972).

How Does Bruner’s Theory Address Language Development?

Bruner emphasises the crucial role of language in cognitive development:

• He views language as a tool for organising thoughts and experiences.
• Bruner introduced the concept of ‘Language Acquisition Support System’ (LASS), emphasising the role of adult-child interactions in language learning.
• He argues that language development is intertwined with cognitive development, each supporting the other.
• Bruner emphasises the importance of narrative in language development and meaning-making.

Practical applications include creating language-rich environments and engaging children in meaningful conversations and storytelling activities (Bruner, 1983).

What is ‘Scaffolding’ and How Can It Be Effectively Implemented?

Scaffolding, a term closely associated with Bruner’s work, involves providing support to learners and gradually reducing it as they gain competence:

• Key principles of effective scaffolding include:
  1. Assessing the learner’s current level of understanding
  2. Providing appropriate support
  3. Gradually withdrawing support as the learner becomes more independent
  4. Encouraging self-regulation and metacognition
• Implementation strategies might include:
  • Breaking tasks into manageable steps
  • Providing prompts and cues
  • Modelling problem-solving strategies
  • Encouraging peer collaboration

Effective scaffolding requires ongoing assessment and adjustment to meet each child’s changing needs (Wood et al., 1976).

How Does Bruner’s Theory Support Multicultural Education?

Bruner’s later work emphasised the importance of cultural context in learning:

• He argued that cognition and learning are deeply influenced by cultural practices and beliefs.
• This perspective supports multicultural education by:
  • Recognising diverse ways of knowing and learning
  • Valuing children’s cultural backgrounds as resources for learning
  • Encouraging exploration of multiple cultural perspectives
  • Promoting culturally responsive teaching practices

Practical applications include incorporating diverse cultural materials, encouraging sharing of cultural experiences, and adapting teaching strategies to align with different cultural learning styles (Bruner, 1996).

References

• Bruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press.
• Bruner, J. S. (1972). Nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27(8), 687-708.
• Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R., J. Jarvelle, and W. J.M. Levelt (eds.) The Child’s Concept of Language. New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.
• Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Department for Education. (2021). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. Gov.uk.
• Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2009). Belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Commonwealth of Australia.
• Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach – advanced reflections. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Egan, K. (2002). Getting it wrong from the beginning: Our progressivist inheritance from Herbert Spencer, John Dewey, and Jean Piaget. Yale University Press.
• Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Routledge.
• Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
• Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. MIT Press.
• Goswami, U. (2008). Cognitive development: The learning brain. Psychology Press.
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.
• Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3-34.
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
• Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 4-14.
• Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2016). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Immordino‐Yang, M. H., Darling‐Hammond, L., & Krone, C. R. (2019). Nurturing nature: How brain development is inherently social and emotional, and what this means for education. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 185-204.
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
• Knopf, H. T., & Swick, K. J. (2007). How parents feel about their child’s teacher/school: Implications for early childhood professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(4), 291-296.
• Ministry of Education, New Zealand. (2017). Te whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Learning Media.
• Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2013). Nurturing early learners: A curriculum framework for kindergartens in Singapore. Pre-school Education Branch, Ministry of Education.
• Mitchell, D. (2014). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. Routledge.
• Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. Frederick A. Stokes Company.
• Nelson, K. (2003). Self and social functions: Individual autobiographical memory and collective narrative. Memory, 11(2), 125-136.
• Nsamenang, A. B. (2018). Global early childhood education and care models and practices: Achieving culturally appropriate programs for children. In M. Fleer & B. van Oers (Eds.), International handbook of early childhood education (pp. 319-344). Springer.
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
• Reese, E., Sparks, A., & Leyva, D. (2010). A review of parent interventions for preschool children’s language and emergent literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(1), 97-117.
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
• Sheridan, S. M., Edwards, C. P., Marvin, C. A., & Knoche, L. L. (2009). Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development, 20(3), 377-401.
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261-292.
• Takaya, K. (2008). Jerome Bruner’s theory of education: From early Bruner to later Bruner. Interchange, 39(1), 1-19.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.
• Waller, R., Hodge, S., Holford, J., Milana, M., & Webb, S. (2021). Lifelong education, social inequality and the COVID-19 health pandemic. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 39(2), 153-160.
• Wood, D., & Attfield, J. (2005). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum. Paul Chapman.
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89-100.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Takaya, K. (2008). Jerome Bruner’s theory of education: From early Bruner to later Bruner. Interchange, 39(1), 1-19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10780-008-9039-2
• Gibbons, A. (2011). The incoherence of the EYFS: Complexity, criticality and the ‘bald assertions’ of policy. Early Years, 31(1), 5-17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09575146.2010.529425
• Smidt, S. (2011). Introducing Bruner: A guide for practitioners and students in early years education. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Introducing-Bruner-A-Guide-for-Practitioners-and-Students-in-Early-Years-Education/Smidt/p/book/9780415574211
• Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum. SAGE. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/play-learning-and-the-early-childhood-curriculum/book234110
• Hedges, H., & Cooper, M. (2016). Inquiring minds: Theorizing children’s interests. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 303-322. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220272.2015.1109711

Recommended Books

• Smidt, S. (2011). Introducing Bruner: A guide for practitioners and students in early years education. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Introducing-Bruner-A-guide-for-practitioners-and-students-in-early-years/Smidt/p/book/9780415574679
  • This book provides a comprehensive overview of Bruner’s theories and their practical applications in early years education.
• Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674179530
  • In this seminal work, Bruner explores the cultural aspects of education and their impact on learning and development.
• Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/play-learning-and-the-early-childhood-curriculum/book234110
  • This book examines the role of play in early childhood education, drawing on Bruner’s theories among others.
• Gopnik, A. (2016). The gardener and the carpenter: What the new science of child development tells us about the relationship between parents and children. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-04983-000
  • While not specifically about Bruner, this book offers insights into child development that complement and extend Bruner’s ideas.
• Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2011). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed.). Praeger. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED531297
  • This book explores the Reggio Emilia approach, which shares many principles with Bruner’s theories on early childhood education.

Recommended Websites

• Harvard University’s Center on the Developing Child: https://developingchild.harvard.edu/
  • Offers a wealth of research-based information on child development, including concepts related to Bruner’s work.
• The British Association for Early Childhood Education: https://www.early-education.org.uk/
  • Provides resources and professional development opportunities for early years practitioners, often incorporating Bruner’s ideas.
• NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children): https://www.naeyc.org/
  • While US-based, this site offers valuable resources and articles on early childhood education, many of which draw on Bruner’s theories.
• The Froebel Trust: https://www.froebel.org.uk/
  • Offers resources and research on play-based learning, which aligns with many of Bruner’s ideas.
• Education Endowment Foundation – Early Years Toolkit: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/early-years-toolkit
  • Provides evidence-based resources for early years practitioners, including strategies that align with Bruner’s theories.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile

To cite this article use:

Early Years TV Jerome Bruner on Child Development: Scaffolding, Discovery Learning, and Spiral Curriculum. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/jerome-bruner-on-child-development-modes-of-representation-scaffolding-discovery-learning-and-spiral-curriculum (Accessed: 22 April 2025).