B.F. Skinner: Operant Conditioning and Behaviourism Theories

A Comprehensive Guide for Early Years Professionals and Students

B.F. Skinner’s theories provided a new perspective on our understanding of learning and behaviour. His work on operant conditioning provides practical tools for Early Years professionals to shape children’s development. From nursery classrooms to university lecture halls, Skinner’s ideas continue to influence educational practices worldwide.

Key concepts include:

• Operant conditioning
• Schedules of reinforcement
• Verbal behaviour

These principles offer concrete strategies for:

• Understanding classroom behaviour
• Enhancing skill acquisition
• Supporting language development

This comprehensive guide explores Skinner’s theories, their practical applications, and their lasting impact on Early Years education. It covers:

1. Skinner’s life and influences
2. Detailed explanations of key concepts
3. Practical applications in Early Years settings
4. Criticisms and limitations of Skinner’s work
5. Comparison with other influential theorists
6. Skinner’s legacy in contemporary education

Whether you’re an Early Years practitioner seeking to enhance your teaching strategies or a student delving into child development theories, this article provides valuable insights into Skinner’s enduring contributions to the field.

Discover how Skinner’s behavioural approach can transform your understanding of child learning and development. Read on to unlock practical strategies for creating effective, engaging learning environments for young children.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction and Background to B.F. Skinner’s Work

Burrhus Frederic Skinner revolutionised the field of psychology with his radical behaviourist approach. His theories on operant conditioning transformed our understanding of learning and behaviour. Skinner’s work profoundly influenced education, child development, and psychological practice.

This article explores Skinner’s key theories, their practical applications in Early Years education, and their lasting impact on the field.

Early Life and Education

B.F. Skinner was born on 20 March 1904 in Susquehanna, Pennsylvania. He grew up in a middle-class family and developed an early interest in invention and mechanics. Skinner attended Hamilton College, where he initially studied literature. However, his encounter with John B. Watson’s behaviourism sparked a lifelong passion for psychology (Skinner, 1967).

Key educational milestones:

• Bachelor’s degree in English from Hamilton College (1926)
• Master’s degree in psychology from Harvard University (1930)
• PhD in psychology from Harvard University (1931)

Historical Context

Skinner developed his theories during a time of significant change in psychology. The early 20th century saw the rise of behaviourism, challenging the prevailing introspective methods. Watson’s ‘Little Albert’ experiment had demonstrated that emotional responses could be conditioned, paving the way for Skinner’s work on operant conditioning (Watson & Rayner, 1920).

The Great Depression and World War II also influenced Skinner’s thinking, leading him to consider how behavioural principles could be applied to solve social problems.

Key Influences

Skinner’s work was shaped by several prominent thinkers:

• John B. Watson: Skinner embraced Watson’s focus on observable behaviour rather than internal mental states.
• Ivan Pavlov: Pavlov’s work on classical conditioning provided a foundation for Skinner’s research on operant conditioning.
• Edward Thorndike: Thorndike’s ‘Law of Effect’ influenced Skinner’s concept of reinforcement (Thorndike, 1898).

Main Concepts and Theories

Skinner’s most significant contributions to psychology include:

1. Operant Conditioning: The idea that behaviour is shaped by its consequences. Positive outcomes strengthen behaviour, while negative outcomes weaken it.
2. Schedules of Reinforcement: Different patterns of reinforcement lead to different rates of response and resistance to extinction.
3. Verbal Behaviour: Skinner proposed that language acquisition follows the same principles as other learned behaviours.
4. Radical Behaviourism: A philosophy of science that rejects mentalistic explanations and focuses solely on observable behaviour and environmental factors.

These theories have had a lasting impact on education, particularly in Early Years settings, where they inform approaches to behaviour management and skill acquisition (Skinner, 1953).

B.F. Skinner’s Key Concepts and Theories

B.F. Skinner’s contributions to psychology and education centre around his theory of operant conditioning, schedules of reinforcement, and verbal behaviour. These concepts have significantly influenced our understanding of learning processes and behaviour modification, particularly in Early Years education.

Operant Conditioning

Operant conditioning, developed by B.F. Skinner, is a method of learning that occurs through rewards and punishments for behaviour. It encourages the repetition of desired behaviours and discourages unwanted ones. Here’s a detailed breakdown of its components:

• Positive Reinforcement: Adding a desirable stimulus to increase behaviour.
  • This involves presenting a rewarding stimulus after a desired behaviour to increase its frequency. The reward strengthens the behaviour, making it more likely to occur in the future.
  • Example: A nursery teacher gives a child a sticker for tidying up toys. The child is more likely to tidy up in the future to receive more stickers.
• Negative Reinforcement: Removing an aversive stimulus to increase behaviour.
  • This involves removing an unpleasant stimulus when a desired behaviour occurs, encouraging the behaviour’s repetition. The relief from the aversive stimulus reinforces the behaviour.
  • Example: A child who puts on their coat before going outside doesn’t have to listen to the teacher’s reminders. The child learns to put on their coat independently to avoid the reminders.
• Positive Punishment: Adding an aversive stimulus to decrease behaviour.
  • This involves presenting an unpleasant consequence after an undesired behaviour to reduce its frequency. The punishment aims to discourage the behaviour from recurring.
  • Example: A child who pushes another child is asked to sit in a time-out area for a few minutes. The child learns that pushing results in losing playtime and is less likely to repeat the behaviour.
• Negative Punishment: Removing a desirable stimulus to decrease behaviour.
  • This involves taking away a pleasant stimulus when an undesired behaviour occurs, aiming to reduce the behaviour’s frequency. The loss of the pleasant stimulus discourages the behaviour.
  • Example: A child who refuses to share toys has the toys temporarily removed. The child learns that not sharing results in losing access to the toys and is more likely to share in the future.
• Extinction: The absence of reinforcement leading to a decrease in behaviour.
  • This occurs when a previously reinforced behaviour is no longer reinforced, causing it to gradually decrease and eventually stop. The behaviour is ‘extinguished’ due to lack of reinforcement.
  • Example: A child who used to get attention by screaming is consistently ignored during those times. Over time, the child learns that screaming no longer result in attention and stops using this as a behaviour strategy.

These principles of operant conditioning form the basis of many behaviour management strategies in Early Years settings. They provide practitioners with tools to shape children’s behaviour effectively and promote positive learning experiences (Skinner, 1953; Ferster & Skinner, 1957).

It’s important to note that while these techniques can be effective, they should be used thoughtfully and in conjunction with other developmental approaches. Early Years practitioners should consider the individual needs of each child and the long-term implications of different reinforcement strategies.

Schedules of Reinforcement

Skinner discovered that the timing and frequency of reinforcement significantly impact behaviour. He identified several reinforcement schedules:

1. Continuous Reinforcement: Every correct response is reinforced.

• Fastest for initial learning
• Behaviour extinguishes quickly when reinforcement stops

2. Fixed Ratio (FR): Reinforcement after a set number of responses.

• High, steady response rate
• Brief pause after reinforcement

3. Variable Ratio (VR): Reinforcement after an unpredictable number of responses.

• High, steady response rate
• Most resistant to extinction

4. Fixed Interval (FI): Reinforcement after a set time period.

• Scalloped pattern of responding
• Pause after reinforcement

5. Variable Interval (VI): Reinforcement after an unpredictable time period.

• Moderate, steady response rate
• Fairly resistant to extinction

Understanding these schedules helps Early Years practitioners design effective reward systems for children (Ferster & Skinner, 1957).

Verbal Behaviour

Skinner proposed that language acquisition follows the same principles as other learned behaviours. He identified several types of verbal behaviour:

• Mands: Requests or demands
• Tacts: Labelling or naming objects
• Echoics: Repeating sounds or words
• Intraverbals: Responding to verbal stimuli with related verbal behaviour

This theory suggests that language development in young children can be facilitated through reinforcement and shaping techniques (Skinner, 1957).

Relationships Between Concepts

Skinner’s theories are interconnected and build upon each other. Operant conditioning provides the foundation, explaining how behaviour is learned and modified. Schedules of reinforcement refine this understanding by detailing how the timing and frequency of consequences affect behaviour. Verbal behaviour extends these principles to language acquisition.

In Early Years education, these concepts combine to inform effective teaching strategies. For example, a practitioner might use positive reinforcement on a variable ratio schedule to encourage prosocial behaviour, while simultaneously using verbal behaviour techniques to support language development.

Behaviour Shaping

Skinner introduced the concept of shaping, a method for teaching new behaviours through successive approximations. This process is particularly relevant in Early Years education for developing complex skills.

Steps in behaviour shaping:

1. Identify the target behaviour: Clearly define the desired outcome.
2. Establish the baseline: Observe the child’s current behaviour.
3. Reinforce approximations: Reward behaviours that are close to the target.
4. Gradually increase expectations: Slowly raise the criteria for reinforcement.
5. Maintain the behaviour: Continue reinforcement to stabilise the new behaviour.

For instance, when teaching a child to write their name, an Early Years practitioner might first reinforce holding a pencil correctly, then making any marks on paper, gradually shaping the behaviour towards forming recognisable letters (Skinner, 1951).

Skinner’s theories provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and influencing behaviour in Early Years settings. By applying these principles, practitioners can create effective learning environments and support children’s development across various domains.

The Skinner Box

The Skinner Box, also known as an operant conditioning chamber, is a device developed by B.F. Skinner to study animal behaviour under controlled conditions. It demonstrates the principles of operant conditioning in a practical, observable setting.

Key Features of the Skinner Box

• Isolated Environment: A chamber that isolates the subject from external stimuli.
  • The box is designed to minimise distractions and allow for precise control of the experimental conditions. This isolation ensures that the observed behaviour is a direct result of the manipulated variables.
  • Example: In an Early Years context, this principle is applied when creating a quiet, distraction-free space for children to focus on specific learning tasks.
• Response Mechanism: A lever, button, or key that the subject can manipulate.
  • This mechanism allows the subject to perform a specific behaviour that can be easily measured and recorded. The simplicity of the response makes it clear when the desired behaviour occurs.
  • Example: In a nursery, this might be represented by a specific toy or activity that children interact with to demonstrate a particular skill or behaviour.
• Reinforcement Delivery System: A method to provide rewards or punishments.
  • This system delivers consequences (e.g., food pellets for animals) immediately following the desired behaviour. The immediacy of the reinforcement is crucial for establishing a clear connection between the behaviour and its consequence.
  • Example: In Early Years practice, this could be a reward chart or a system of immediate verbal praise for desired behaviours.
• Recording Device: Equipment to track and measure responses.
  • This allows for precise quantification of behaviour, enabling researchers to analyse patterns and frequencies of responses. The data collected provides objective evidence of behaviour changes over time.
  • Example: In an Early Years setting, this might involve keeping detailed observation records of children’s behaviours and responses to different stimuli or activities.

Applications and Implications

The Skinner Box demonstrated several key principles of operant conditioning:

• Shaping Behaviour: The box allowed for the gradual shaping of complex behaviours through reinforcement of successive approximations.
  • This process involves rewarding behaviours that are increasingly closer to the desired outcome, allowing for the development of new skills or behaviours over time.
  • Example: In Early Years education, this principle is applied when teaching children new skills, such as writing. Practitioners might first reward holding a pencil correctly, then making marks, and gradually shape this into letter formation.
• Schedules of Reinforcement: Different patterns of reinforcement could be tested to observe their effects on behaviour.
  • Skinner discovered that varying the timing and frequency of reinforcement could significantly impact the rate and persistence of a behaviour.
  • Example: In a nursery setting, this might involve varying the frequency of praise or rewards for different behaviours to maintain motivation and engagement.
• Extinction and Spontaneous Recovery: The box demonstrated how behaviours could be extinguished and potentially recover.
  • When reinforcement for a behaviour stops, the behaviour typically decreases (extinction). However, the behaviour might spontaneously reappear after a period of time (spontaneous recovery).
  • Example: In Early Years practice, this might be observed when a previously eliminated behaviour (like biting or screaming) suddenly reappears after a period of absence.

The Skinner Box has been influential in understanding learning processes and behaviour modification. Its principles have been applied beyond animal studies to human learning contexts, including Early Years education. However, it’s important to note that while these mechanistic principles can be useful, Early Years practitioners should consider them as part of a holistic approach to child development, taking into account emotional, social, and cognitive factors (Skinner, 1938; Staddon & Cerutti, 2003).

B.F. Skinner’s Contributions to the Field of Education and Child Development

Impact on Educational Practices

B.F. Skinner’s theories have significantly influenced educational practices, particularly in Early Years settings. His work on operant conditioning has shaped approaches to behaviour management and skill acquisition.

Behaviour management: Skinner’s principles of reinforcement have been widely adopted in classroom management strategies. Many Early Years settings use token economies, where children earn rewards for positive behaviours. For example, a nursery might use a sticker chart system, where children receive stickers for sharing toys or helping tidy up. This approach directly applies Skinner’s concept of positive reinforcement (Filcheck et al., 2004).

Programmed instruction: Skinner developed the concept of programmed instruction, which involves breaking down complex skills into smaller, manageable steps. This approach is evident in many Early Years literacy and numeracy programmes. For instance, phonics instruction often follows a step-by-step progression, reinforcing each sound before moving to the next, aligning with Skinner’s principle of shaping behaviour (Skinner, 1968).

Immediate feedback: Skinner emphasised the importance of immediate reinforcement. This principle has led to increased use of immediate feedback in educational settings. In Early Years classrooms, practitioners often provide instant verbal praise or visual cues (like thumbs up) to reinforce desired behaviours or correct responses (Hattie & Timperley, 2007).

Shaping our Understanding of Child Development

Skinner’s work has deepened our understanding of how children learn and develop new skills.

Skill acquisition: His theory of operant conditioning explains how children acquire new skills through reinforcement. This understanding has influenced teaching methods across various developmental domains. For example, in language development, practitioners might use Skinner’s concept of verbal behaviour to encourage children’s speech by reinforcing attempts at communication (Sundberg & Michael, 2001).

Motivation and learning: Skinner’s work on schedules of reinforcement has provided insights into how children’s motivation can be maintained during the learning process. This knowledge has informed practices such as variable ratio reinforcement schedules in Early Years settings, where rewards are given at unpredictable intervals to maintain engagement in learning activities (Cameron & Pierce, 1994).

Behavioural approach to development: While not without criticism, Skinner’s behavioural approach has contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of child development. It complements other theories by focusing on observable behaviours and environmental influences, providing a practical framework for supporting children’s growth and learning (Bijou & Baer, 1961).

Relevance to Contemporary Education

Skinner’s ideas continue to influence contemporary educational practices and research.

Positive Behaviour Support (PBS): This modern approach to behaviour management in schools builds on Skinner’s principles of reinforcement. PBS focuses on creating supportive environments and teaching appropriate behaviours, rather than punishing negative ones. For instance, an Early Years setting might implement a ‘buddy system’ to encourage prosocial behaviours, reinforcing positive interactions between children (Carr et al., 2002).

Computer-assisted instruction: Skinner’s concept of programmed instruction has evolved with technology. Many educational apps and software programmes for young children incorporate principles of immediate feedback and progressive skill development, echoing Skinner’s ideas. For example, alphabet learning apps often use positive reinforcement (like celebratory sounds or animations) when children correctly identify letters (Reiser, 2001).

Precision Teaching: This educational approach, based on Skinner’s work, involves frequent measurement of learning progress and adjustment of teaching methods accordingly. In Early Years settings, this might involve daily one-minute assessments of a child’s letter recognition skills, with instruction tailored based on the results (Lindsley, 1992).

While some aspects of Skinner’s theories have been critiqued or modified over time, his emphasis on observable behaviour and the role of environment in learning continues to shape educational practices. His work provides a practical framework for understanding and influencing children’s behaviour and learning in Early Years settings.

Criticisms and Limitations of B.F. Skinner’s Theories and Concepts

While B.F. Skinner’s work has significantly influenced child development and education, it has faced various criticisms and limitations. Understanding these critiques is crucial for Early Years professionals to apply Skinner’s ideas effectively and responsibly. This section examines the main areas of criticism, including research methods, key concepts, and contextual limitations.

Criticisms of Research Methods

• Overreliance on animal studies: Skinner’s theories largely stem from experiments on animals, particularly rats and pigeons. Critics argue that human behaviour, especially in complex social contexts, may not be adequately represented by these animal models (Chomsky, 1959).
• Lack of ecological validity: The controlled environment of the Skinner Box, while useful for isolating variables, doesn’t reflect the complexity of real-world learning environments. Early Years settings involve numerous factors that influence behaviour and learning, which weren’t accounted for in Skinner’s laboratory studies (Bronfenbrenner, 1977).
• Limited focus on internal processes: Skinner’s emphasis on observable behaviour neglected internal cognitive processes. This approach may oversimplify the complexities of human learning and development, particularly in areas such as language acquisition and problem-solving (Bandura, 1977).

Challenges to Key Concepts or Theories

• Oversimplification of human behaviour: Critics argue that Skinner’s behavioural approach reduces complex human actions to simple stimulus-response patterns. This view may not fully account for the role of thoughts, emotions, and individual agency in shaping behaviour (Chomsky, 1971).
• Neglect of biological factors: Skinner’s focus on environmental influences downplayed the role of genetic and biological factors in development. Modern research in areas such as neuroscience and genetics suggests a more complex interplay between nature and nurture (Pinker, 2002).
• Ethical concerns: The use of reinforcement and punishment to shape behaviour raises ethical questions, particularly in educational settings. Critics argue that this approach may manipulate children rather than fostering intrinsic motivation and autonomous decision-making (Kohn, 1993).

Contextual and Cultural Limitations

• Cultural bias: Skinner’s theories were developed primarily in a Western context and may not fully account for cultural variations in learning and behaviour. Early Years settings often involve diverse cultural backgrounds, which may require different approaches to reinforcement and behaviour management (Rogoff, 2003).
• Neglect of social context: The focus on individual behaviour in Skinner’s work overlooked the importance of social interactions and relationships in learning and development. Sociocultural theories, such as those proposed by Vygotsky, emphasise the crucial role of social context in cognitive development (Vygotsky, 1978).
• Limited consideration of developmental stages: Skinner’s theories don’t address how reinforcement strategies might need to change as children develop. Early Years professionals need to consider how children’s responses to behavioural interventions may vary with age and developmental stage (Piaget, 1952).

Addressing the Criticisms and Limitations in Practice

Despite these criticisms, Skinner’s work continues to offer valuable insights for Early Years practice. Educators can address these limitations by:

• Integrating multiple perspectives: Combining behavioural approaches with other theories, such as cognitive and sociocultural perspectives, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of child development.
• Adapting to individual and cultural differences: Early Years professionals should consider each child’s unique background and needs when applying behavioural strategies. For example, reinforcement techniques may need to be tailored to align with diverse cultural values and practices.
• Promoting intrinsic motivation: While using Skinner’s reinforcement principles, educators can also focus on fostering children’s internal drive to learn and explore. This might involve creating engaging environments that naturally encourage desired behaviours without relying solely on external rewards.
• Considering ethical implications: Early Years practitioners should carefully consider the ethical implications of behaviour modification techniques. This includes being transparent with parents about behavioural strategies and ensuring that interventions respect children’s autonomy and dignity.

By acknowledging these criticisms and limitations, Early Years professionals can use Skinner’s theories more effectively, integrating them with other approaches to support children’s holistic development. This balanced approach allows educators to harness the strengths of behavioural techniques while addressing their potential shortcomings in diverse and complex Early Years settings.

Practical Applications of B.F. Skinner’s Work

Translating Skinner’s theories into practical strategies offers Early Years professionals valuable tools for promoting children’s learning and development. This section explores applications in curriculum design, classroom management, and family engagement, while addressing potential challenges in implementation.

Application in Curriculum and Lesson Planning

• Programmed Learning: Skinner’s concept of programmed instruction informs the design of structured learning activities. Early Years practitioners can break complex skills into smaller, manageable steps.

Example: Teaching children to write their names by first reinforcing proper pencil grip, then individual letter formation, and finally combining letters.

• Behaviour Shaping: Practitioners use reinforcement to gradually shape desired behaviours or skills.

Example: In teaching tidying up, first praise children for picking up a single toy, then for putting toys in designated areas, and eventually for completing the entire clean-up process.

• Continuous Assessment: Skinner’s emphasis on measurable outcomes encourages ongoing assessment of children’s progress.

Example: Using daily observations and checklists to track children’s developing skills in areas such as social interaction or fine motor control.

Strategies for Classroom Management and Interaction

• Token Economy Systems: Implement a system where children earn tokens for positive behaviours, which can be exchanged for rewards.

Example: Children receive stickers for helping peers or completing tasks, which they can trade for extra playtime or a special responsibility.

• Positive Reinforcement: Consistently acknowledge and reward desired behaviours to increase their frequency.

Example: Offer specific praise when children share toys or resolve conflicts peacefully, such as “I like how you took turns with the blocks.”

• Extinction: Reduce unwanted behaviours by withholding attention or reinforcement.

Example: When a child seeks attention through minor disruptions, redirect focus to children displaying appropriate behaviour instead.

Engaging Families and Communities

• Behaviour Charts: Collaborate with parents to use consistent reinforcement strategies at home and in the Early Years setting.

Example: Create a chart where children receive stamps for positive behaviours both at nursery and at home, promoting consistency across environments.

• Parent Workshops: Organise sessions to explain Skinner’s principles and how they’re applied in the Early Years setting.

Example: Host a workshop demonstrating how positive reinforcement techniques can be used to encourage desirable behaviours at home.

• Community Involvement: Extend Skinner’s principles to engage with the wider community.

Example: Organise a community clean-up day where children receive recognition for their contributions, reinforcing civic responsibility.

Overcoming Challenges and Barriers to Implementation

• Resource Constraints: Address limitations in time or materials through creative adaptations of Skinner’s principles.

Example: Use a peer recognition system where children award each other ‘kindness points’, reducing the need for material rewards.

• Ethical Concerns: Balance the use of external reinforcements with strategies to promote intrinsic motivation.

Example: Gradually reduce tangible rewards and increase verbal praise and natural consequences as children develop.

• Individual Differences: Adapt Skinner’s approaches to meet diverse needs and learning styles.

Example: For children less responsive to social praise, identify individual motivators through observation and parent consultation.

• Consistency Among Staff: Ensure all team members understand and consistently apply behavioural strategies.

Example: Conduct regular team meetings to discuss behavioural approaches and share successful strategies.

While applying Skinner’s theories, it’s crucial to maintain a holistic view of child development. Early Years professionals should integrate these behavioural strategies with other developmental approaches to create a well-rounded learning environment. By thoughtfully adapting Skinner’s principles to their specific context, practitioners can enhance children’s learning experiences and promote positive behaviour effectively (Alberto & Troutman, 2013).

Comparing B.F. Skinner’s Ideas with Other Theorists

Understanding how Skinner’s ideas relate to other child development theories provides a broader context for Early Years practice. This section compares Skinner’s work with that of Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky, and Albert Bandura. Examining these theories side by side reveals complementary insights and contrasting perspectives on child development.

Comparison with Jean Piaget

Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, developed the theory of cognitive development, emphasising how children’s thinking evolves through distinct stages.

• Focus on Observable Behaviour: Both Skinner and Piaget emphasised the importance of observable actions. However, Piaget interpreted these as indicators of internal cognitive structures, while Skinner focused solely on the behaviours themselves.
• Stages of Development: Piaget proposed fixed stages of cognitive development, whereas Skinner viewed development as a continuous process shaped by environmental reinforcement.
• Role of Environment: Both recognised the environment’s importance, but Skinner saw it as the primary driver of development, while Piaget emphasised the child’s active role in constructing knowledge through interaction with the environment.

Example: In learning number concepts, Piaget would focus on the child’s cognitive readiness and schema development, while Skinner would emphasise reinforcing correct responses to numerical tasks.
Read our in-depth article on Jean Piaget here.

Comparison with Lev Vygotsky

Lev Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist, developed sociocultural theory, emphasising the role of social interaction in cognitive development.

• Social Influence: Both Skinner and Vygotsky acknowledged the importance of the social environment. However, Vygotsky saw social interaction as crucial for higher-order thinking, while Skinner focused on how social reinforcement shapes behaviour.
• Language Development: Vygotsky viewed language as a tool for thought and social interaction, whereas Skinner saw it as a learned behaviour reinforced by the environment.
• Zone of Proximal Development: Vygotsky’s concept of scaffolding within the zone of proximal development shares similarities with Skinner’s shaping technique, but emphasises social support rather than reinforcement schedules.

Example: In teaching problem-solving skills, Vygotsky would advocate for guided participation and dialogue, while Skinner would focus on reinforcing successful steps towards the solution.
Read our in-depth article on Lev Vygotsky here.

Comparison with Albert Bandura

Albert Bandura, a Canadian-American psychologist, developed social learning theory, which bridges behavioural and cognitive approaches.

• Observational Learning: Bandura emphasised learning through observation, a concept not central to Skinner’s theory. However, both recognised the role of the environment in shaping behaviour.
• Self-Efficacy: Bandura introduced the concept of self-efficacy, focusing on internal cognitive processes, which contrasts with Skinner’s emphasis on external reinforcement.
• Reciprocal Determinism: Bandura proposed a model of reciprocal determinism, where behaviour, environment, and personal factors interact. This offers a more complex view than Skinner’s focus on environmental influences.

Example: In promoting prosocial behaviour, Bandura would emphasise role modelling and building children’s confidence, while Skinner would focus on reinforcing specific prosocial actions.
Read our in-depth article on Albert Bandura here.

Synthesis and Implications for Practice

Understanding these comparisons enables Early Years practitioners to draw from multiple perspectives:

• Holistic Approach: Combining Skinner’s behavioural strategies with Piaget’s focus on cognitive readiness and Vygotsky’s emphasis on social interaction creates a comprehensive approach to supporting child development.
• Flexible Strategies: Recognising the strengths of each theory allows practitioners to adapt their approaches based on individual children’s needs and specific learning contexts.
• Reflective Practice: Comparing theories encourages critical reflection on practice, promoting a deeper understanding of child development and learning processes.

Example: An Early Years practitioner might use Skinner’s reinforcement techniques to encourage participation in activities, consider Piaget’s stages to ensure age-appropriate challenges, and apply Vygotsky’s scaffolding to support learning within social interactions.

Limitations and Challenges of Comparing Theorists

While comparing theories provides valuable insights, it’s important to consider:

• Historical Context: Each theory emerged from specific historical and cultural contexts, influencing its focus and assumptions.
• Oversimplification: Comparisons risk oversimplifying complex theories, potentially overlooking nuanced aspects of each approach.
• Integrative Approach: Rather than viewing theories as competing explanations, practitioners benefit from seeing them as complementary perspectives on the multifaceted nature of child development.

Early Years professionals should approach these comparisons with a critical mindset, recognising that integrating insights from multiple theories often provides the most comprehensive understanding of child development and learning (Mooney, 2013).

B.F. Skinner’s Legacy and Ongoing Influence

B.F. Skinner’s contributions to child development and Early Years practice continue to shape contemporary research, policy, and professional practice. His behavioural approach has left an indelible mark on our understanding of learning and behaviour modification. This section explores Skinner’s enduring influence in research, educational policy, and professional practice, highlighting the ongoing relevance of his work in modern Early Years settings.

Impact on Contemporary Research

Skinner’s ideas continue to inspire and inform current research in child development and learning:

• Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA): Skinner’s principles form the foundation of ABA, a widely researched intervention approach for children with autism spectrum disorders. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of ABA in improving social skills, communication, and adaptive behaviours in young children (Reichow et al., 2018).
• Digital Learning Technologies: Skinner’s concept of programmed instruction has evolved into sophisticated digital learning platforms. Research on adaptive learning technologies, which adjust content difficulty based on learner responses, builds directly on Skinner’s ideas of immediate feedback and reinforcement (Bulger, 2016).
• Positive Behaviour Support (PBS): Contemporary research on PBS in Early Years settings extends Skinner’s work on reinforcement. Studies have shown that PBS can significantly reduce challenging behaviours and improve social-emotional outcomes in young children (Carter & Van Norman, 2010).

Influence on Educational Policy and Curriculum

Skinner’s behavioural approach has significantly influenced educational policies and curriculum frameworks:

• Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS): The UK’s EYFS framework incorporates elements of Skinner’s behavioural approach, particularly in its emphasis on positive reinforcement and the importance of a structured learning environment (Department for Education, 2021).
• Head Start Performance Standards: In the United States, the Head Start program’s focus on measurable outcomes and the use of positive reinforcement strategies reflects Skinner’s influence on early childhood education policy (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2016).
• Behaviour Management Policies: Many Early Years settings have adopted behaviour management policies that draw on Skinner’s principles of reinforcement and extinction. These policies often emphasise positive reinforcement of desired behaviours rather than punishment of undesired ones.

Ongoing Relevance for Professional Practice

Skinner’s theories continue to inform daily practices in Early Years settings:

• Token Economy Systems: Many Early Years practitioners use token economies based on Skinner’s work. For example, a nursery might use a ‘star chart’ system to reinforce positive behaviours like sharing or helping peers.
• Precision Teaching: This instructional approach, rooted in Skinner’s emphasis on measurable outcomes, is used to teach specific skills in Early Years settings. For instance, practitioners might use precision teaching techniques to support children’s phonics development (Lindsley, 1992).
• Behaviour Shaping: Early Years professionals often use Skinner’s concept of shaping to teach complex skills. For example, teaching a child to zip up their coat might involve reinforcing progressively closer approximations of the desired behaviour.

Current Developments and Future Directions

While Skinner’s legacy is significant, contemporary researchers and practitioners continue to refine and expand upon his ideas:

• Integration with Cognitive Approaches: Current trends involve integrating Skinner’s behavioural principles with cognitive theories, recognising the role of internal mental processes in learning and behaviour (Dughmi, 2019).
• Cultural Responsiveness: There is growing emphasis on adapting behavioural approaches to be more culturally responsive, addressing critiques of Skinner’s work as being culturally limited (Sugai et al., 2012).
• Ethical Considerations: Ongoing debates about the ethical implications of behaviour modification techniques in Early Years settings have led to more nuanced applications of Skinner’s principles, balancing external reinforcement with strategies to promote intrinsic motivation (Kohn, 1993).

As the field of Early Years education continues to evolve, Skinner’s ideas remain a valuable foundation. However, practitioners are encouraged to engage critically with these concepts, integrating them with other theoretical perspectives and adapting them to meet the diverse needs of contemporary Early Years settings. The ongoing influence of Skinner’s work underscores the importance of understanding his theories for current and future Early Years professionals.

Conclusion

B.F. Skinner’s contributions to child development and Early Years education have left an indelible mark on the field. His theories of operant conditioning, reinforcement schedules, and verbal behaviour have significantly shaped our understanding of how children learn and develop.

• Operant conditioning: Skinner’s core concept explains how behaviour is shaped by its consequences, providing a framework for understanding and influencing children’s actions.
• Schedules of reinforcement: This theory elucidates how the timing and frequency of reinforcement affect behaviour, offering insights into effective motivation strategies.
• Verbal behaviour: Skinner’s approach to language acquisition as a learned behaviour has influenced strategies for supporting children’s communication skills.

These ideas have profound implications for Early Years practice, informing approaches to curriculum design, behaviour management, and skill acquisition.

• Positive reinforcement: Practitioners can use Skinner’s principles to encourage desired behaviours through strategic praise and rewards.
• Behaviour shaping: Complex skills can be taught by reinforcing successive approximations of the desired behaviour.
• Programmed learning: Skinner’s concept informs the design of structured, step-by-step learning activities tailored to individual children’s needs.

Early Years professionals can benefit from applying these strategies in their settings, potentially enhancing children’s learning outcomes and social-emotional development.

However, it is crucial to engage critically with Skinner’s ideas, recognising their limitations and considering contemporary critiques. His focus on observable behaviour, while valuable, may not fully account for cognitive processes or sociocultural factors influencing development.

• Integrate multiple perspectives: Combine Skinner’s behavioural approach with cognitive and sociocultural theories for a more comprehensive understanding of child development.
• Consider individual differences: Adapt behavioural strategies to suit diverse cultural backgrounds and individual needs.
• Balance external and intrinsic motivation: While using reinforcement, also foster children’s internal drive to learn and explore.

Early Years practitioners are encouraged to apply Skinner’s principles thoughtfully in their work, adapting them to their specific contexts and the unique needs of the children in their care. By sharing experiences and insights with colleagues, professionals contribute to the ongoing refinement and application of Skinner’s legacy in Early Years education.

Skinner’s work continues to offer valuable tools for supporting children’s development and learning. As the field evolves, his theories remain a significant foundation upon which Early Years professionals can build effective, evidence-based practice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How Does Skinner’s Theory Apply to Language Development in Early Years?

Skinner viewed language acquisition as a learned behaviour, shaped by environmental reinforcement. His theory of verbal behaviour explains language development through operant conditioning principles:

• Mands: Requests or demands reinforced by receiving the requested item or action.
• Tacts: Labelling or naming objects, reinforced by social approval or confirmation.
• Echoics: Repeating sounds or words, reinforced by social interaction or imitation.
• Intraverbals: Responding to verbal stimuli with related verbal behaviour, reinforced by successful communication.

Early Years practitioners can apply this by:

1. Providing immediate, positive responses to children’s verbal attempts.
2. Creating opportunities for children to use language in meaningful contexts.
3. Modelling correct language use and gradually shaping children’s speech towards more complex forms.

While Skinner’s approach has been critiqued for underestimating innate language capacities (Chomsky, 1959), it offers practical strategies for supporting language development in Early Years settings.

What Are the Ethical Considerations of Using Behavioural Techniques in Early Years?

The use of behavioural techniques in Early Years settings raises several ethical considerations:

1. Autonomy: Concerns about manipulating children’s behaviour versus fostering intrinsic motivation.
2. Long-term effects: Questions about the impact of external reinforcement on children’s future motivation and decision-making.
3. Cultural sensitivity: Ensuring behavioural techniques respect diverse cultural values and practices.

To address these concerns, Early Years practitioners can:

• Balance external reinforcement with opportunities for child-led learning and exploration.
• Gradually shift from tangible rewards to social reinforcement and natural consequences.
• Involve families in discussions about behavioural strategies to ensure cultural appropriateness.
• Regularly reflect on and evaluate the impact of behavioural techniques on children’s overall well-being and development.

Ethical application of Skinner’s principles involves thoughtful consideration of these issues and adaptation to individual children’s needs (Kohn, 1993).

How Can Skinner’s Ideas Be Integrated with Play-Based Learning Approaches?

While Skinner’s behavioural approach might seem at odds with play-based learning, the two can be integrated effectively:

1. Structured play environments: Design play areas that naturally reinforce desired behaviours and skills.
2. Choice and consequences: Allow children to make choices in their play and experience natural consequences, aligning with Skinner’s emphasis on behaviour-consequence relationships.
3. Positive reinforcement during play: Offer specific praise and encouragement for positive behaviours and skill development observed during play.

Examples of integration:

• Set up a dramatic play area with props that encourage turn-taking and cooperation, reinforcing these behaviours through successful play experiences.
• Use open-ended materials in construction play, praising children’s problem-solving efforts to reinforce persistence and creativity.

This integration allows for child-led learning while still applying Skinner’s principles of reinforcement and behaviour shaping (Trawick-Smith, 2013).

What Role Does Punishment Play in Skinner’s Theory, and Is It Appropriate in Early Years Settings?

Skinner recognised punishment as a consequence that decreases behaviour but generally advocated for positive reinforcement over punishment:

• Punishment may suppress behaviour temporarily but doesn’t teach alternative behaviours.
• It can lead to negative emotional responses and avoidance behaviours.
• The effects of punishment often don’t generalise beyond the specific context.

In Early Years settings, alternatives to punishment include:

1. Positive reinforcement of desired behaviours.
2. Redirection to more appropriate activities.
3. Natural and logical consequences for actions.
4. Teaching and reinforcing alternative behaviours.

While mild forms of negative punishment (e.g., brief time-outs) are sometimes used, the focus should be on creating a positive learning environment that encourages desired behaviours (Alberto & Troutman, 2013).

How Can Skinner’s Theories Support Inclusive Practice in Early Years Settings?

Skinner’s behavioural approach offers several strategies for supporting inclusive practice:

1. Individualised reinforcement: Identify effective reinforcers for each child, considering their unique preferences and needs.
2. Task analysis: Break down complex skills into smaller, achievable steps, allowing children with diverse abilities to experience success.
3. Positive behaviour support: Use Skinner’s principles to create supportive environments that prevent challenging behaviours and promote positive interactions.

Practical applications include:

• Creating visual schedules and using token systems to support children with autism in following classroom routines.
• Using differential reinforcement to encourage alternative behaviours for children with behavioural challenges.
• Applying shaping techniques to support motor skill development in children with physical disabilities.

By focusing on observable behaviours and environmental modifications, Skinner’s approach provides concrete strategies for meeting diverse needs in inclusive settings (Odom et al., 2011).

What Was B. F. Skinner’s Theory?

B.F. Skinner’s theory, known as radical behaviourism, posits that all behaviour is determined by environmental consequences. Key components include:

1. Operant conditioning: Behaviour is shaped by its consequences.
2. Reinforcement: Consequences that increase behaviour frequency.
3. Punishment: Consequences that decrease behaviour frequency.
4. Schedules of reinforcement: Patterns of reinforcement delivery affecting behaviour.
5. Verbal behaviour: Language acquisition as a learned behaviour.

Skinner emphasised:

• Observable behaviour over internal mental states.
• The role of the environment in shaping behaviour.
• The importance of positive reinforcement in learning.

This theory has significantly influenced educational practices, particularly in behaviour management and skill acquisition in Early Years settings (Skinner, 1953).

What Is B. F. Skinner Best Known For?

B.F. Skinner is best known for several key contributions to psychology and education:

1. Operant conditioning: His refinement of this concept revolutionised understanding of learning and behaviour modification.
2. Skinner Box: This experimental apparatus allowed for precise study of animal behaviour under controlled conditions.
3. Schedules of reinforcement: Skinner’s work on how reinforcement timing affects behaviour persistence and extinction.
4. Verbal Behaviour: His controversial theory applying behavioural principles to language acquisition.
5. Programmed instruction: An educational technique breaking complex tasks into smaller, reinforced steps.
6. Radical behaviourism: His philosophical approach emphasising observable behaviour over internal mental states.

In Early Years education, Skinner’s ideas have particularly influenced:

• Behaviour management strategies
• Approaches to skill acquisition and teaching methods
• Understanding of motivation and reinforcement in learning

These contributions continue to shape educational practices and research in child development (Cooper et al., 2020).

What Is Skinner’s Operant Learning Theory?

Skinner’s operant learning theory, a cornerstone of behaviourism, proposes that learning occurs through the consequences of behaviour. Key aspects include:

1. Voluntary behaviour: Focus on actions emitted by the organism, not reflexive responses.
2. Consequences: Behaviour is strengthened or weakened based on its outcomes.
3. Reinforcement: Consequences that increase behaviour frequency.
4. Punishment: Consequences that decrease behaviour frequency.
5. Environmental control: Behaviour is shaped by manipulating environmental factors.

The theory emphasises:

• Learning through trial and error
• The role of feedback in shaping behaviour
• The importance of immediate consequences

In Early Years settings, this theory informs:

• Design of learning activities with clear, immediate feedback
• Use of praise and rewards to encourage desired behaviours
• Creation of environments that naturally reinforce target skills

Operant learning theory provides a framework for understanding and influencing children’s behaviour and skill development (Skinner, 1938).

What Are the Principles of Skinner’s Operant Conditioning Theory?

Skinner’s operant conditioning theory is based on several key principles:

1. Reinforcement: Consequences that increase behaviour frequency.
   • Positive reinforcement: Adding a desirable stimulus
   • Negative reinforcement: Removing an aversive stimulus
2. Punishment: Consequences that decrease behaviour frequency.
   • Positive punishment: Adding an aversive stimulus
   • Negative punishment: Removing a desirable stimulus
3. Extinction: Cessation of reinforcement leading to behaviour decrease.
4. Schedules of reinforcement: Patterns of reinforcement delivery affecting behaviour.
   • Continuous reinforcement
   • Intermittent reinforcement (fixed and variable ratios/intervals)
5. Shaping: Reinforcing successive approximations towards a target behaviour.
6. Chaining: Breaking complex behaviours into a sequence of simpler behaviours.
7. Stimulus control: Environmental cues that trigger specific behaviours.

These principles guide Early Years practice in:

• Designing effective reward systems
• Managing challenging behaviours
• Teaching new skills and routines
• Creating supportive learning environments

Understanding these principles allows practitioners to effectively apply operant conditioning in educational settings (Ferster & Skinner, 1957).

References

• Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. C. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Pearson.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
• Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1961). Child development: A systematic and empirical theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513-531.
• Bulger, M. (2016). Personalized learning: The conversations we’re not having. Data and Society, 22.
• Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.
• Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R. H., Koegel, R. L., Turnbull, A. P., Sailor, W., Anderson, J. L., Albin, R. W., Koegel, L. K., & Fox, L. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(1), 4-16.
• Carter, D. R., & Van Norman, R. K. (2010). Class-wide positive behavior support in preschool: Improving teacher implementation through consultation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(4), 279-288.
• Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35(1), 26-58.
• Chomsky, N. (1971). The case against B. F. Skinner. The New York Review of Books, 17(11), 18-24.
• Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Department for Education. (2021). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. Gov.uk.
• Dughmi, Y. (2019). Behavioral and cognitive approaches in learning theories. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(4), 90-95.
• Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Filcheck, H. A., McNeil, C. B., Greco, L. A., & Bernard, R. S. (2004). Using a whole-class token economy and coaching of teacher skills in a preschool classroom to manage disruptive behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 351-361.
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
• Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
• Lindsley, O. R. (1992). Precision teaching: Discoveries and effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(1), 51-57.
• Mooney, C. G. (2013). Theories of childhood: An introduction to Dewey, Montessori, Erikson, Piaget & Vygotsky. Redleaf Press.
• Odom, S. L., Buysse, V., & Soukakou, E. (2011). Inclusion for young children with disabilities: A quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 344-356.
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
• Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Viking.
• Reichow, B., Hume, K., Barton, E. E., & Boyd, B. A. (2018). Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (5).
• Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 57-67.
• Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
• Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.
• Skinner, B. F. (1951). How to teach animals. Freeman.
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
• Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Skinner, B. F. (1967). B. F. Skinner: An autobiography. In E. G. Boring & G. Lindzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 385-413). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
• Staddon, J. E., & Cerutti, D. T. (2003). Operant conditioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 115-144.
• Sugai, G., O’Keeffe, B. V., & Fallon, L. M. (2012). A contextual consideration of culture and school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14(4), 197-208.
• Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25(5), 698-724.
• Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 2(4), i-109.
• Trawick-Smith, J. (2013). Early childhood development: A multicultural perspective. Pearson.
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2016). Head Start Program Performance Standards. Administration for Children and Families.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(1), 1-14.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Baum, W. M. (2011). Behaviorism, private events, and the molar view of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 185-200. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3211371/
• Catania, A. C. (2013). A natural science of behavior. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 133-139. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1037/a0033026
• Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, W. B. (2018). Why we are still not acting to save the world: The upward challenge of a post-Skinnerian behavior science. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 241-267. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40614-018-0162-9
• Malott, R. W. (2008). Principles of behavior. Journal of Higher Education, 79(4), 462-463. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772111
• Schlinger Jr, H. D. (2021). The impact of B. F. Skinner’s science of operant learning on early childhood education and beyond. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 22(1), 14-24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1305309

Recommended Books

• Kaufman, R., & Wandberg, R. (2010). Powerful Environments for Promoting Deep Conceptual and Strategic Learning. Sense Publishers.
  • This book offers a critical perspective on behavioural approaches, exploring alternative methods for fostering deep learning.
• Lattal, K. A., & Chase, P. N. (Eds.). (2003). Behavior Theory and Philosophy. Springer.
  • An in-depth exploration of the philosophical underpinnings of behaviorism, offering a broader context for Skinner’s work.
• Morris, E. K., Smith, N. G., & Altus, D. E. (2005). B. F. Skinner: A Comprehensive Bibliography. Springer.
  • A comprehensive resource for those wanting to delve deeper into Skinner’s original works and their impact.
• Nevin, J. A. (1999). Analyzing Behavior: A Handbook of Methods. Routledge.
  • Provides practical methods for applying behavioural analysis in various settings, including education.
• Rutherford, A. (2009). Beyond the Box: B.F. Skinner’s Technology of Behaviour from Laboratory to Life, 1950s-1970s. University of Toronto Press.
  • Offers a historical perspective on how Skinner’s ideas were applied beyond the laboratory, including in education.

Recommended Websites

• Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI): https://www.abainternational.org/
  • Provides resources, publications, and conference information related to behavioural analysis and its applications in various fields, including education.
• B. F. Skinner Foundation: https://www.bfskinner.org/
  • Offers a wealth of information about Skinner’s life and work, including archived materials and resources for educators.
• Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies: https://behavior.org/
  • Provides a range of resources on behavioural science, including applications in education and child development.
• The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/19383711
  • Features current research in behavioural analysis, including studies relevant to educational contexts.
• Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS): https://www.pbis.org/
  • Offers resources and information on implementing positive behavioural support strategies in educational settings, building on Skinner’s work while incorporating more recent developments.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Early Years TV B.F. Skinner: Operant Conditioning and Behaviourism Theories. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/b-f-skinner-operant-conditioning-and-behaviourism-theories (Accessed: 09 December 2024).

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile