Albert Bandura on Social Learning Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, Self-Efficacy and Bobo Doll

A Comprehensive Guide for Early Years Professionals and Students

Albert Bandura’s theories revolutionised our understanding of child development and learning. His work on social learning, self-efficacy, and social cognitive theory provides essential insights for Early Years professionals, educators, and students. Bandura’s ideas shape modern educational practices, influencing how we foster children’s growth and learning in diverse settings.

Bandura introduced key concepts that remain central to Early Years education:

• Social Learning Theory: Children learn by observing and imitating others.
• Self-Efficacy: A child’s belief in their abilities influences their motivation and achievement.
• Social Cognitive Theory: Learning occurs through a dynamic interplay of personal, behavioural, and environmental factors.

These ideas offer practical applications for Early Years settings:

• Designing effective learning environments that promote observational learning
• Building children’s confidence and resilience through carefully structured experiences
• Creating positive behaviour management strategies based on modelling and reinforcement

Early years professionals and educators use Bandura’s work to create effective learning environments and support children’s social-emotional development. By understanding these theories, practitioners can enhance their approach to fostering growth and learning in young children.

This article explores Bandura’s key concepts, their practical applications in Early Years settings, and their ongoing relevance in child development research. Whether you’re an experienced practitioner or a student of early childhood education, this comprehensive guide offers valuable insights into Bandura’s enduring influence on the field.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction and Background to Albert Bandura’s Work

Albert Bandura revolutionised the field of psychology and education. His theories reshaped our understanding of human learning and development. This article explores Bandura’s life, his groundbreaking ideas, and their profound impact on Early Years education.

Bandura’s work bridges behaviourism and cognitive psychology. He introduced social learning theory, self-efficacy, and social cognitive theory. These concepts transformed educational practices and child development theories.

Early Life and Education

Albert Bandura was born on 4 December 1925 in Mundare, Alberta, Canada. He grew up in a small farming community. Bandura’s early experiences shaped his interest in human behaviour.

• Born to Polish immigrant parents
• Attended a small school with limited resources
• Self-taught through independent study

Bandura earned his bachelor’s degree from the University of British Columbia in 1949. He completed his PhD in clinical psychology at the University of Iowa in 1952 (Bandura, 1986).

Historical Context

Bandura developed his theories during a period of significant change in psychology:

• 1950s-1960s: Dominance of behaviourism
• Growing interest in cognitive processes
• Emergence of humanistic psychology

The post-war era saw increased focus on child development and education. This environment provided fertile ground for Bandura’s innovative ideas.

Key Influences

Bandura’s work was influenced by several prominent thinkers:

• B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning
• Jean Piaget’s cognitive development theory
• Robert Sears’ social learning approach

These influences are evident in Bandura’s integration of behavioural and cognitive elements in his theories (Zimmerman & Schunk, 2003).

Main Concepts and Theories

Bandura’s key contributions include:

1. Social Learning Theory: People learn through observation, imitation, and modelling.
2. Self-efficacy: Belief in one’s ability to succeed influences behaviour and motivation.
3. Social Cognitive Theory: Emphasises the interplay between personal, behavioural, and environmental factors.
4. Bobo Doll Experiment: Demonstrated the impact of observed aggression on children’s behaviour.

These theories have had a lasting impact on Early Years education. They inform classroom practices, behaviour management strategies, and child development models (Bandura, 1977).

Bandura’s work continues to influence educational theory and practice. His ideas remain relevant in understanding how children learn and develop in Early Years settings.

Bandura’s Key Concepts and Theories

Albert Bandura’s theories revolutionised our understanding of human learning and development. His work bridged behaviourism and cognitive psychology, introducing concepts that profoundly influenced Early Years education. Bandura’s theories explain how children learn through observation, develop self-belief, and interact with their environment.

Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory

• Triadic Reciprocal Determinism: The core concept of Social Cognitive Theory, emphasising the interplay between personal factors, behaviour, and environment.
  • This model posits that an individual’s behaviour both influences and is influenced by personal factors and the environment. These three elements interact continuously, shaping learning and development.
  • In an Early Years setting, a child’s confidence (personal factor) might lead them to attempt a puzzle (behaviour), which, if successful, could encourage the teacher to provide more challenging puzzles (environment).
• Symbolizing Capability: The ability to use symbols to understand and interact with the environment.
  • Humans can create internal models of experience, enabling them to test solutions mentally before acting. This capability allows for complex problem-solving and abstract thinking.
  • A child might use blocks to represent different animals in imaginative play, demonstrating their ability to use symbols to represent real-world objects.
• Vicarious Capability: The ability to learn by observing others’ actions and their consequences.
  • This capability allows individuals to acquire new behaviours without direct experience, significantly expanding learning opportunities.
  • Children might learn how to use new art materials by watching their peers, rather than through direct instruction or trial and error.
• Forethought Capability: The ability to anticipate future consequences of actions.
  • Individuals can set goals, plan strategies, and motivate themselves based on anticipated outcomes. This capability is crucial for self-directed learning.
  • A child might persist in practising writing their name, anticipating the praise they will receive when they can do it independently.
• Self-Regulatory Capability: The ability to control one’s own thoughts, feelings, and actions.
  • This involves setting personal standards, self-observation, and self-reaction. It allows individuals to direct their own learning and behaviour.
  • A child might use self-talk to remember classroom rules, such as “hands to yourself” when interacting with peers.
• Self-Reflective Capability: The ability to analyse one’s own experiences and thought processes.
  • This metacognitive capability allows individuals to evaluate their own thoughts and actions, learning from successes and failures.
  • After completing a task, a child might reflect on what strategies worked well, informing their approach to future challenges.

Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory provides a comprehensive framework for understanding human learning and behaviour. It emphasises the active role individuals play in their own development, while acknowledging the influence of social and environmental factors (Bandura, 1986).

Bandura’s Social Learning Theory

• Attention: The process of noticing and focusing on specific behaviours or events.
  • Attention is influenced by various factors, including the observer’s characteristics, the model’s attributes, and environmental features. It is the first step in observational learning.
  • In a nursery, children might be particularly attentive to a peer who is confidently using new playground equipment, especially if that peer is well-liked or seen as competent.
• Retention: The process of remembering observed behaviours.
  • Retention involves converting observations into symbolic representations that can be stored in memory. This process is enhanced by mental rehearsal and coding strategies.
  • A child might mentally rehearse the steps of a new song and dance routine taught by their teacher, helping them to remember it for later performance.
• Reproduction: The process of translating symbolic representations into action.
  • This stage involves physically performing the observed behaviour. Success depends on having the necessary physical and cognitive skills to replicate the action.
  • After observing a teacher demonstrate how to tie shoelaces, a child attempts to replicate the action, gradually improving with practice.
• Motivation: The drive to perform the learned behaviour.
  • Motivation is influenced by direct, vicarious, and self-produced incentives. Individuals are more likely to reproduce behaviours they believe will result in valued outcomes.
  • A child might be motivated to share toys after observing that children who share are praised by the teacher and invited to play by peers.

Social Learning Theory emphasises the importance of observation and modelling in the learning process. It bridges behavioural and cognitive learning theories, recognising the role of mental processes in social learning (Bandura, 1977).

Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory

• Mastery Experiences: Personal experiences of success or failure.
  • These are the most influential source of self-efficacy. Successful experiences build robust belief in one’s capabilities, while failures undermine it, especially if they occur before a sense of efficacy is firmly established.
  • A child who successfully completes an increasingly difficult series of puzzles develops a strong sense of efficacy in problem-solving tasks.
• Vicarious Experiences: Observations of others’ successes or failures.
  • Seeing others similar to oneself succeed raises observers’ beliefs that they too possess the capabilities to master comparable activities. Conversely, observing others fail can lower self-efficacy.
  • A child who observes a classmate with similar abilities learn to ride a bicycle might develop increased confidence in their own ability to learn this skill.
• Verbal Persuasion: Encouragement or discouragement from others.
  • People who are persuaded verbally that they possess the capabilities to master given activities are likely to mobilise greater effort and sustain it than if they harbour self-doubts and dwell on personal deficiencies.
  • A teacher who provides specific, genuine praise for a child’s efforts in learning to write might boost that child’s belief in their ability to master this skill.
• Physiological and Affective States: Physical and emotional reactions to situations.
  • People partly rely on their physiological and emotional states in judging their capabilities. Positive mood enhances perceived self-efficacy, while negative mood diminishes it.
  • A child who feels calm and excited when attempting new activities in the classroom is likely to have higher self-efficacy than one who experiences anxiety and stress.

Self-efficacy theory emphasises the crucial role of an individual’s beliefs about their capabilities in determining their motivation, behaviour, and achievement. It has significant implications for Early Years education, influencing approaches to teaching, motivation, and assessment (Bandura, 1997).

The Bobo Doll Experiment

• Experimental Design: A structured study to observe children’s imitation of aggressive behaviour.
  • The experiment involved exposing children to adult models displaying either aggressive or non-aggressive behaviour towards a Bobo doll, then observing the children’s subsequent behaviour when left alone with the doll.
  • Children were divided into groups: those who observed aggressive models, those who observed non-aggressive models, and a control group with no exposure to models.
• Observed Aggressive Behaviours: Specific actions displayed by the adult models.
  • The aggressive models physically and verbally attacked the Bobo doll, including hitting it with a mallet, sitting on it, punching it, and using aggressive phrases.
  • These behaviours were novel to the children, allowing researchers to clearly identify imitation rather than coincidental similar behaviour.
• Children’s Responses: The behaviours exhibited by children after exposure to the models.
  • Children who observed aggressive models were more likely to exhibit both imitative and non-imitative aggressive behaviours compared to those in the non-aggressive and control groups.
  • Boys were generally more aggressive than girls, and boys were more influenced by same-sex models, while girls were influenced by both male and female models.
• Verbal Aggression: The imitation of aggressive language.
  • Children exposed to aggressive models were more likely to use aggressive language, demonstrating that verbal behaviour can be acquired through observation.
  • This finding highlighted the importance of modelling appropriate language in Early Years settings.
• Implications for Social Learning Theory: The experiment’s support for observational learning.
  • The Bobo doll experiment provided empirical evidence for Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, demonstrating that children can learn new behaviours simply by observing others.
  • This study emphasised the responsibility of adults in modelling appropriate behaviour, particularly in Early Years environments where children are highly susceptible to influence.

The Bobo Doll experiment was groundbreaking in its demonstration of observational learning and its implications for understanding aggression in children. It continues to influence Early Years practice, particularly in approaches to behaviour management and the creation of positive learning environments (Bandura et al., 1961).

Relationships Between Concepts and Theories

Bandura’s theories are interconnected and mutually reinforcing:

• Social Learning Theory forms the foundation for understanding observational learning.
• Self-Efficacy explains how beliefs about personal capability influence learning and behaviour.
• Social Cognitive Theory integrates these concepts within a broader framework of human agency and environmental interaction.

Together, these theories provide a comprehensive approach to understanding child development and learning in social contexts.

Developmental Progression in Social Learning

While Bandura did not propose a strict stage theory, his work suggests a progression in children’s social learning abilities:

1. Simple Imitation: Young children directly copy observed actions.
2. Symbolic Representation: Children develop the ability to mentally represent observed behaviours.
3. Abstract Modelling: Older children extract general rules from observed behaviours.
4. Self-Regulation: Children develop the ability to control their own behaviour based on internalised standards.

This progression underscores the importance of age-appropriate modelling and scaffolding in Early Years education (Zimmerman & Schunk, 2003).

Bandura’s theories continue to shape Early Years practice. They inform approaches to behaviour management, social skills development, and the creation of supportive learning environments.

Bandura’s Contributions to the Field of Education and Child Development

Albert Bandura’s theories have profoundly influenced educational practices and our understanding of child development. His work continues to shape contemporary approaches to teaching and learning in Early Years settings and beyond.

Impact on Educational Practices

Bandura’s Social Learning Theory and Social Cognitive Theory have revolutionised teaching methods and classroom management strategies. His ideas have led to significant changes in how educators approach instruction and behaviour management.

• Modelling and Demonstration: Teachers now consciously model desired behaviours and skills. In an Early Years classroom, a teacher might demonstrate how to use scissors safely, allowing children to observe before attempting the task themselves.
• Peer Learning: Bandura’s work has highlighted the importance of peer interactions in learning. Nurseries often use ‘buddy systems’ where older children help younger ones with tasks, fostering both social skills and knowledge transfer.
• Scaffolding: Educators use Bandura’s concept of self-efficacy to provide appropriate challenges and support. A practitioner might gradually reduce assistance as a child learns to zip up their coat, building confidence and independence.
• Positive Reinforcement: Bandura’s theories emphasise the role of motivation in learning. Early Years settings often use praise and reward systems to encourage positive behaviours and learning efforts.

Shaping our Understanding of Child Development

Bandura’s work has provided crucial insights into cognitive, social, and emotional development in children. His theories have enhanced our understanding of how children learn and grow.

• Cognitive Development: Bandura’s emphasis on mental processes in learning has deepened our understanding of children’s cognitive development. For example, his work on symbolising capability explains how children use mental representations to understand their world.
• Social Development: Social Learning Theory has illuminated the importance of social interactions in development. Observations in nurseries show how children learn social norms and behaviours through watching and imitating peers and adults.
• Emotional Development: Bandura’s concept of self-efficacy has enhanced our understanding of emotional development. Research has shown that children with high self-efficacy are more resilient in facing challenges (Schunk & Meece, 2006).
• Moral Development: The Bobo Doll experiments highlighted how children learn moral behaviours through observation. This has informed approaches to teaching values and ethics in Early Years settings.

Relevance to Contemporary Education

Bandura’s theories remain highly relevant in contemporary education, informing current practices and research in Early Years education.

• Technology Integration: Bandura’s ideas on observational learning have informed the development of educational videos and apps. For instance, programmes like ‘Sesame Street’ use modelling to teach social skills and academic concepts.
• Inclusive Practices: Social Cognitive Theory supports inclusive education by emphasising the role of the environment in learning. Early Years settings use this understanding to create supportive environments for children with diverse needs.
• Self-Regulated Learning: Bandura’s work on self-efficacy and self-regulation has influenced approaches to fostering independent learning. Nurseries now often include ‘choice time’ where children select and manage their own activities.
• Social-Emotional Learning: Contemporary programmes focusing on social-emotional skills in Early Years often draw on Bandura’s theories. The ‘PATHS’ curriculum, for example, uses modelling and practice to teach emotional regulation (Greenberg et al., 1995).
• Growth Mindset: Carol Dweck’s work on growth mindset, popular in current educational discourse, builds on Bandura’s concept of self-efficacy (Dweck, 2006).

Bandura’s contributions continue to shape Early Years practice. His theories provide a foundation for understanding how children learn and develop, informing evidence-based approaches to education. As new challenges emerge in education, Bandura’s ideas remain a valuable resource for educators and researchers alike.

Criticisms and Limitations of Bandura’s Theories and Concepts

Albert Bandura’s work has significantly influenced child development and education. However, his theories have faced criticisms and limitations. Understanding these critiques provides a more comprehensive view of Bandura’s ideas and their application in Early Years settings.

Criticisms of Research Methods

• Limited Ecological Validity: The Bobo doll experiments, while groundbreaking, occurred in controlled laboratory settings. This raises questions about how well the findings translate to real-world situations in Early Years environments (Durkin, 1995).
• Ethical Concerns: Some critics argue that exposing children to aggressive behaviours in the Bobo doll experiments raises ethical issues. Early Years practitioners must consider the ethical implications of research when applying findings to their practice.
• Short-Term Observations: Many of Bandura’s studies focused on immediate effects rather than long-term outcomes. This limitation challenges the application of his theories to understanding children’s development over time.

Challenges to Key Concepts or Theories

• Oversimplification of Learning: Critics argue that Social Learning Theory oversimplifies the complex process of human learning. It may not fully account for cognitive processes involved in learning beyond observation and imitation (Ormrod, 2014).
• Underemphasis on Biology: Bandura’s theories have been criticised for not adequately addressing biological factors in behaviour and development. Early Years professionals should consider both environmental and biological influences on children’s development.
• Deterministic View: Some argue that Social Cognitive Theory presents a somewhat deterministic view of human behaviour, potentially underestimating individual agency. This critique encourages practitioners to balance environmental influences with children’s individual choices and motivations.

Contextual and Cultural Limitations

• Cultural Bias: Bandura’s research primarily involved Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) populations. This limits the generalisability of his findings to diverse cultural contexts (Henrich et al., 2010).
• Socioeconomic Factors: Critics argue that Bandura’s theories do not sufficiently address how socioeconomic factors influence learning and development. Early Years practitioners should consider how children’s social and economic backgrounds might affect their learning experiences.
• Historical Context: Bandura’s theories were developed in a specific historical context. Some argue that they may not fully account for rapid technological and social changes affecting contemporary childhoods.

Addressing the Criticisms and Limitations in Practice

Despite these criticisms, Bandura’s theories offer valuable insights for Early Years practice. Practitioners can address these limitations by:

• Contextualising Application: Adapt Bandura’s ideas to suit specific cultural and socioeconomic contexts. For example, consider how different cultures might view self-efficacy and adjust teaching strategies accordingly.
• Integrating Multiple Perspectives: Combine Bandura’s theories with other developmental perspectives. For instance, incorporate Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory to address cultural context in learning (Vygotsky, 1978).
• Emphasising Individual Differences: Recognise that children may respond differently to social learning experiences. Tailor modelling and reinforcement strategies to individual children’s needs and preferences.
• Long-Term Observation: Supplement Bandura’s theories with longitudinal observations of children’s development. This approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of how social learning influences children over time.
• Ethical Considerations: When applying Bandura’s ideas, particularly those derived from the Bobo doll experiments, prioritise ethical considerations. Ensure that modelling and observational learning experiences are positive and do not expose children to harmful behaviours.
• Technological Adaptation: Update Bandura’s concepts to include modern forms of observational learning, such as through digital media. Consider how children might learn from online videos or educational apps, while being mindful of screen time recommendations.

By acknowledging these criticisms and limitations, Early Years professionals can apply Bandura’s theories more effectively. This balanced approach ensures that social learning principles are used thoughtfully and appropriately in diverse Early Years settings.

Practical Applications of Bandura’s Work

Translating Bandura’s theories into practical strategies enhances learning and development in Early Years settings. This section focuses on applying his ideas to curriculum design, classroom management, and family engagement. These applications promote children’s social, cognitive, and emotional growth.

Application in Curriculum and Lesson Planning

Bandura’s theories inform curriculum design and daily activities in Early Years settings. These applications create engaging learning experiences that support children’s development.

• Observational Learning Stations: Set up activity stations where children observe and imitate skills. For example, a ‘threading station’ where children watch peers thread beads before attempting the task themselves.
• Role-Play Scenarios: Create role-play areas that allow children to act out observed behaviours. A ‘shop’ corner enables children to practise social interactions and numeracy skills they’ve observed in real-life situations.
• Self-Efficacy Building Activities: Design activities with gradually increasing difficulty. For instance, start with simple puzzles and progress to more complex ones, allowing children to build confidence in their problem-solving abilities.
• Peer Tutoring: Implement a ‘buddy system’ where older or more experienced children assist younger ones with tasks. This applies Bandura’s concept of modelling while fostering social skills.

Strategies for Classroom Management and Interaction

Bandura’s Social Learning Theory and concept of self-efficacy inform effective classroom management strategies. These approaches create a positive learning environment and support children’s social-emotional development.

• Positive Behaviour Modelling: Educators consistently model desired behaviours. For example, demonstrating how to share toys or resolve conflicts peacefully.
• Social Skills Coaching: Use role-play and guided practice to teach social skills. For instance, practise turn-taking in small groups, with the teacher modelling appropriate language and behaviour.
• Reinforcement Strategies: Implement a system of positive reinforcement aligned with Bandura’s ideas. This might include a ‘kindness tree’ where leaves are added when children demonstrate caring behaviours.
• Self-Regulation Techniques: Teach self-regulation strategies based on Bandura’s work on self-efficacy. For example, introduce ‘calm-down corners’ where children can use breathing techniques or sensory tools to manage their emotions.

Engaging Families and Communities

Bandura’s theories emphasise the importance of social context in learning. Engaging families and communities extends the learning environment beyond the classroom.

• Parent Workshops: Organise workshops to share Bandura’s concepts with parents. For example, a session on how to build children’s self-efficacy through praise and encouragement at home.
• Home Learning Kits: Provide families with resources that support observational learning at home. This might include simple science experiment kits or storytelling props that parents can use with their children.
• Community Role Models: Invite local community members to share their skills and experiences with children. This applies Bandura’s concept of learning through observation of diverse role models.
• Family Involvement Projects: Design projects that involve families in children’s learning. For instance, a ‘family traditions’ project where children share and learn about different cultural practices, fostering a sense of community and cultural awareness.

Overcoming Challenges and Barriers to Implementation

Applying Bandura’s theories in practice can present challenges. However, creative solutions can overcome these barriers.

• Resource Constraints: Address limited resources by using everyday materials for learning activities. For example, create a ‘recycled materials construction area’ where children can observe and imitate building techniques.
• Time Limitations: Integrate Bandura’s concepts into existing routines. For instance, use transition times for quick modelling of social skills or self-regulation techniques.
• Diverse Learning Needs: Adapt strategies to suit individual children’s needs. For example, use visual aids or simplified steps when modelling tasks for children with different learning styles or developmental needs.
• Cultural Considerations: Ensure that modelling and observational learning experiences reflect the diverse cultural backgrounds of children in the setting. This might involve inviting family members to share cultural practices or using multicultural resources in role-play areas.

Implementing Bandura’s theories requires flexibility and creativity. Early Years professionals can start with small, manageable changes and gradually expand their application of his ideas. Regular reflection and adaptation ensure that these strategies effectively support children’s learning and development.

By applying Bandura’s theories thoughtfully, Early Years settings create rich learning environments that foster children’s social, cognitive, and emotional growth. These practical applications demonstrate the enduring relevance of Bandura’s work in contemporary Early Years education.

Comparing Bandura’s Ideas with Other Theorists

Understanding Bandura’s theories in relation to other prominent figures in child development enriches our comprehension of early learning. This section compares Bandura’s ideas with those of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bronfenbrenner. Examining these comparisons informs and enhances Early Years practice by providing a multi-faceted view of child development.

Comparison with Jean Piaget

Jean Piaget’s cognitive development theory focuses on how children’s thinking evolves through distinct stages. While Bandura and Piaget both emphasise the active role of the child in learning, their approaches differ significantly.

• Cognitive Processes: Both theorists highlight the importance of mental processes in learning. Piaget focuses on internal cognitive structures, while Bandura emphasises the interplay between cognitive, behavioural, and environmental factors.
• Stages vs. Continuous Development: Piaget proposes distinct stages of cognitive development. Bandura views development as a more continuous process influenced by social interactions and observations.
• Role of Environment: Bandura places greater emphasis on the social environment in learning. Piaget focuses more on the child’s individual interactions with the physical world.
• Learning Mechanisms: Piaget emphasises equilibration, assimilation, and accommodation. Bandura highlights observational learning and modelling.

In practice, an Early Years professional might combine these approaches by providing age-appropriate materials (Piagetian) while also modelling their use (Bandurian).

Read our in-depth article on Jean Piaget here.

Comparison with Lev Vygotsky

Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory shares several commonalities with Bandura’s work, particularly in emphasising the social nature of learning.

• Social Interaction: Both theorists stress the importance of social interaction in learning. Vygotsky focuses on adult-child interactions, while Bandura emphasises peer and observational learning.
• Cultural Context: Vygotsky places greater emphasis on cultural tools and practices in shaping development. Bandura acknowledges cultural influence but focuses more on immediate social environments.
• Zone of Proximal Development: Vygotsky’s concept aligns with Bandura’s ideas on scaffolding and modelling, both emphasising the role of more knowledgeable others in learning.
• Language: Vygotsky views language as crucial for cognitive development. Bandura considers language as one of many tools for observational learning and self-regulation.

An Early Years practitioner might apply both theories by using language-rich modelling (Vygotsky) within peer learning activities (Bandura).

Read our in-depth article on Lev Vygotsky here.

Comparison with Urie Bronfenbrenner

Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory provides a broader context for understanding development, complementing Bandura’s focus on social learning.

• Environmental Influence: Both theorists recognise the importance of environment in development. Bronfenbrenner offers a more comprehensive view of nested environmental systems.
• Proximal Processes: Bronfenbrenner’s emphasis on proximal processes aligns with Bandura’s focus on direct social interactions and observations.
• Active Role of the Individual: Both theories acknowledge the individual’s active role in development. Bandura focuses on cognitive processes, while Bronfenbrenner emphasises the individual’s interaction with various environmental systems.
• Scope of Influence: Bronfenbrenner considers broader societal and cultural influences. Bandura primarily focuses on more immediate social environments.

In practice, an Early Years professional might use Bandura’s modelling techniques while considering Bronfenbrenner’s multiple levels of environmental influence in planning family engagement activities.

Read our in-depth article on Urie Bronfenbrenner here.

Synthesis and Implications for Practice

Comparing these theories reveals both complementary and contrasting perspectives on child development. Early Years professionals benefit from integrating these diverse viewpoints:

• Combine Bandura’s observational learning with Piaget’s hands-on exploration in activity planning.
• Use Vygotsky’s emphasis on language alongside Bandura’s modelling in storytelling and dramatic play.
• Consider Bronfenbrenner’s broader systems when applying Bandura’s social learning principles in family engagement.

This integrated approach provides a more comprehensive understanding of child development, informing richer, more nuanced Early Years practice.

Limitations and Challenges of Comparing Theorists

Comparing theorists presents challenges:

• Historical Context: Each theory emerged in a specific historical and cultural context, affecting its focus and assumptions.
• Disciplinary Differences: Theories from different disciplines (e.g., psychology, sociology) may use varying terminology and methodologies.
• Oversimplification: Comparisons risk oversimplifying complex theories, potentially overlooking nuances.

Early Years professionals should approach these comparisons critically, recognising that each theory offers valuable insights while acknowledging that no single theory fully captures the complexity of child development.

By understanding these comparisons, limitations, and potential integrations, Early Years practitioners can develop a more flexible, informed approach to supporting children’s learning and development.

Bandura’s Legacy and Ongoing Influence

Albert Bandura’s contributions to child development and Early Years practice remain profoundly influential. His work continues to shape research, policy, and professional practice. Understanding Bandura’s legacy is crucial for Early Years professionals and students, as it informs current approaches and future directions in the field.

Impact on Contemporary Research

Bandura’s theories continue to inspire and guide contemporary research in child development and learning.

• Self-Efficacy Studies: Recent research has expanded Bandura’s concept of self-efficacy in early childhood. For example, Schunk and DiBenedetto (2016) explored how young children’s self-efficacy beliefs influence their motivation and academic achievement.
• Social Media and Observational Learning: Researchers are applying Bandura’s observational learning theory to understand how children learn from social media. A study by O’Keeffe and Clarke-Pearson (2011) examined the impact of social media on children’s social and emotional development.
• Neuroscience and Social Learning: Advances in neuroscience have provided new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying social learning. Iacoboni (2009) investigated the role of mirror neurons in imitation and observational learning, supporting Bandura’s theories at a neurological level.

These studies have practical implications for Early Years settings, such as designing activities that boost self-efficacy and carefully considering the use of digital media in learning environments.

Influence on Educational Policy and Curriculum

Bandura’s ideas have significantly influenced educational policy and curriculum development in Early Years settings.

• Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) Curricula: Many SEL programmes, such as the PATHS curriculum (Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies), incorporate Bandura’s concepts of self-efficacy and self-regulation (Greenberg et al., 1995).
• Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) in England: The EYFS framework reflects Bandura’s emphasis on the social nature of learning and the importance of positive role models (Department for Education, 2021).
• Head Start Performance Standards in the USA: These standards incorporate Bandura’s ideas on the importance of social experiences and self-regulation in early learning (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2016).

These policy implementations have led to increased focus on social skills, self-regulation, and learning through observation in Early Years settings.

Ongoing Relevance for Professional Practice

Bandura’s theories continue to inform the daily practices of Early Years educators and caregivers.

• Modelling Techniques: Educators use intentional modelling to demonstrate skills and behaviours, from basic self-care tasks to complex problem-solving strategies.
• Scaffolding Self-Efficacy: Practitioners design activities with graduated challenges to build children’s confidence and self-efficacy in various domains.
• Peer Learning Strategies: Early Years settings often implement ‘buddy systems’ or peer tutoring programmes based on Bandura’s observational learning principles.
• Positive Behaviour Support: Many behaviour management approaches in Early Years settings draw on Bandura’s ideas about reinforcement and social learning.

These practices support children’s social, emotional, and cognitive development in Early Years settings.

Current Developments and Future Directions of Bandura’s Work

While Bandura’s legacy is significant, ongoing research continues to refine and extend his ideas.

• Cultural Considerations: Researchers are exploring how cultural factors influence social learning and self-efficacy beliefs. For example, Chen and Uttal (1988) examined differences in mathematical self-efficacy between Chinese and American children.
• Digital Age Applications: As technology becomes more prevalent in children’s lives, researchers are investigating how Bandura’s theories apply to digital learning environments (Kirschner & Karpinski, 2010).
• Neurodevelopmental Perspectives: Emerging research is exploring how Bandura’s theories align with our understanding of brain development in early childhood (Meltzoff et al., 2009).
• Resilience and Coping: Bandura’s work on self-efficacy is being extended to study how children develop resilience and coping strategies in the face of adversity (Masten, 2001).

These developments encourage Early Years professionals to engage critically with Bandura’s ideas, adapting them to diverse cultural contexts and emerging technological landscapes.

Bandura’s enduring legacy provides a robust foundation for understanding child development and learning. However, Early Years professionals must continue to evaluate and adapt these ideas in light of new research and changing societal contexts. This ongoing process ensures that Bandura’s insights remain relevant and effective in supporting children’s growth and development in contemporary Early Years settings.

Conclusion

Albert Bandura’s theories have profoundly shaped our understanding of child development and Early Years education. His work on social learning, self-efficacy, and social cognitive theory provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how children learn and develop.

• Social Learning Theory: Emphasises the importance of observation and modelling in learning.
• Self-Efficacy: Highlights the role of belief in one’s abilities in shaping behaviour and motivation.
• Social Cognitive Theory: Integrates personal, behavioural, and environmental factors in explaining human functioning.

These concepts have revolutionised our approach to Early Years education, emphasising the social nature of learning and the active role children play in their own development.

Bandura’s ideas have significant implications for Early Years practice. They inform strategies for curriculum design, classroom management, and family engagement.

• Observational Learning: Practitioners can use intentional modelling to demonstrate skills and behaviours.
• Self-Efficacy Building: Activities can be designed with graduated challenges to build children’s confidence.
• Environmental Design: Classrooms can be structured to promote positive social interactions and learning opportunities.
• Family Engagement: Bandura’s theories support the importance of involving families in children’s learning processes.

Applying these principles in Early Years settings promotes children’s social, emotional, and cognitive development, fostering confident and capable learners.

While Bandura’s theories offer valuable insights, critical engagement with his ideas is crucial. Early Years professionals should consider the cultural context, individual differences, and emerging research when applying these theories.

• Cultural Adaptations: Consider how Bandura’s concepts may apply differently across diverse cultural settings.
• Individual Differences: Recognise that children may respond differently to social learning experiences.
• Ongoing Research: Stay informed about current studies that build upon or challenge Bandura’s ideas.

This critical approach ensures that Bandura’s theories remain relevant and effective in contemporary Early Years practice.

Early Years professionals and students are encouraged to apply Bandura’s ideas creatively in their practice. Experiment with different applications, reflect on their effectiveness, and share insights with colleagues.

• Reflective Practice: Regularly evaluate how Bandura’s theories inform your work with children.
• Professional Development: Seek opportunities to deepen your understanding of social learning and cognitive development.
• Collaborative Learning: Engage in discussions with colleagues about how to best apply these theories in your specific context.

By engaging actively with Bandura’s legacy, Early Years practitioners contribute to the ongoing evolution of the field, ensuring that his insights continue to benefit children’s learning and development for years to come.

Frequently Asked Questions

Social Cognitive Theory

How does Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory differ from traditional behaviourism?

Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory diverges from traditional behaviourism in several key ways:

• Cognitive Processes: Bandura emphasises the role of mental processes in learning, whereas traditional behaviourism focuses solely on observable behaviour.
• Observational Learning: Social Cognitive Theory introduces the concept of learning through observation, not just through direct experience as in behaviourism.
• Self-Regulation: Bandura’s theory highlights an individual’s capacity for self-directed behaviour change, a concept absent in strict behaviourism.
• Environmental Interaction: While both theories acknowledge environmental influences, Social Cognitive Theory posits a more dynamic, reciprocal relationship between the individual and their environment.

These differences have significant implications for Early Years practice, encouraging educators to consider children’s thoughts, beliefs, and social interactions in addition to their observable behaviours.

How can I apply Social Cognitive Theory in a diverse Early Years classroom?

Applying Social Cognitive Theory in a diverse Early Years classroom involves several strategies:

• Diverse Role Models: Provide a range of role models that reflect the cultural diversity of your classroom. This might include inviting community members from various backgrounds to share their experiences.
• Cultural Sensitivity: Be aware of cultural differences in learning styles and social norms. Adjust your modelling and reinforcement strategies accordingly.
• Inclusive Environment: Create an environment that represents and values all cultures present in your classroom. This could involve displays, books, and materials that reflect diverse experiences.
• Collaborative Learning: Encourage peer learning opportunities where children from different backgrounds can model skills and behaviours for each other.

Remember, Social Cognitive Theory emphasises the importance of social context in learning. By creating an inclusive, culturally responsive environment, you’re providing a rich context for all children to learn and develop (Bandura, 2002).

How does Social Cognitive Theory explain the role of environment in learning?

Social Cognitive Theory posits that learning occurs through a dynamic interplay between personal, behavioural, and environmental factors. This concept, known as triadic reciprocal determinism, explains that:

• The environment shapes a child’s behaviour and cognitive processes
• A child’s actions can modify their environment
• Personal factors (such as beliefs and expectations) influence how a child interacts with their environment

In Early Years settings, this means:

1. Creating stimulating learning environments that encourage exploration
2. Recognising that children actively shape their learning experiences
3. Understanding that a child’s beliefs about their abilities (self-efficacy) influence their engagement with the environment

Practitioners can apply this by designing flexible learning spaces that respond to children’s interests and abilities, fostering a reciprocal relationship between the child and their environment (Bandura, 1986).

How can Social Cognitive Theory be applied to promote inclusive practice in Early Years settings?

Social Cognitive Theory offers several strategies for promoting inclusive practice:

1. Diverse Role Models: Provide a range of role models representing different abilities, cultures, and backgrounds. This allows all children to see themselves represented in positive learning scenarios.
2. Scaffolded Learning Experiences: Design activities that can be adapted to different skill levels, allowing all children to experience success and build self-efficacy.
3. Positive Environmental Interactions: Create an environment that encourages positive interactions between all children, fostering a sense of belonging and social inclusion.
4. Cultural Sensitivity: Recognise that social learning may occur differently across cultures, and adapt teaching strategies accordingly.
5. Self-Reflection Opportunities: Encourage children to reflect on their learning experiences, promoting metacognitive skills across all ability levels.

By applying these principles, Early Years practitioners can create inclusive environments that support the learning and development of all children, regardless of their individual differences or backgrounds (Bandura, 2002).

Social Learning Theory

What’s the difference between imitation and observational learning in Bandura’s theory?

While often used interchangeably, imitation and observational learning in Bandura’s Social Learning Theory have distinct meanings:

• Imitation: This refers to the direct copying of observed behaviour. It’s a straightforward replication of what has been seen.
• Observational Learning: This is a broader concept that includes imitation but goes beyond it. It involves:

1. Attention to the modelled behaviour
2. Retention of the observed information
3. Reproduction of the behaviour (which may or may not be an exact imitation)
4. Motivation to perform the behaviour

• Key Difference: Observational learning can result in new behaviours that weren’t directly modelled, as the learner may combine or modify observed behaviours.

In Early Years settings, both processes are important. Children may imitate basic actions directly, but they also learn more complex skills and concepts through broader observational learning (Bandura, 1977).

How can I use Social Learning Theory to manage challenging behaviours in my Early Years setting?

Social Learning Theory offers several strategies for managing challenging behaviours:

• Positive Role Modelling: Consistently model the behaviours you want to see. This includes how you interact with children and other adults in the setting.
• Peer Modelling: Encourage children who display positive behaviours to work alongside those struggling with challenging behaviours.
• Vicarious Reinforcement: Praise children who demonstrate desired behaviours in front of others. This allows children to learn from observing the consequences of others’ actions.
• Clear Expectations: Clearly communicate and visually display behavioural expectations. Use pictures or symbols to make these accessible to all children.
• Consistent Consequences: Ensure that consequences for behaviours (both positive and negative) are consistent and immediately following the behaviour.

Remember, according to Bandura, children learn not just from direct experience, but from observing others’ experiences. Consistent application of these strategies can create a positive learning environment where desired behaviours are reinforced through multiple channels (Bandura, 1986).

How can I use Social Learning Theory to encourage positive behaviour in group settings?

Social Learning Theory offers several strategies for encouraging positive behaviour in group settings:

1. Group Role Models: Identify children who consistently demonstrate positive behaviours and pair them with others who are struggling. This peer modelling can be highly effective.
2. Group Rewards: Implement a system where the entire group is rewarded for collective positive behaviour. This encourages children to support and reinforce each other’s good behaviour.
3. Storytelling and Role-Play: Use stories and dramatic play to model positive social interactions and problem-solving strategies. Encourage children to act out these scenarios.
4. Group Discussions: Facilitate group conversations about behaviour, allowing children to share their thoughts and learn from each other’s perspectives.
5. Visual Cues: Use visual aids like behaviour charts or symbol systems that the whole group can refer to and understand.

Remember, consistency is key. Ensure all staff members are aligned in their approach to reinforce the desired behaviours consistently across all group activities (Bandura, 1977).

How does Social Learning Theory account for individual differences in learning?

While Social Learning Theory emphasises the role of observation and modelling in learning, it also acknowledges individual differences:

• Attention Processes: Children vary in their ability to attend to and perceive the essential features of modelled behaviour. Factors like cognitive development, prior experiences, and personal interests influence this.
• Retention Processes: The ability to remember observed behaviours differs among children, influenced by factors such as memory capacity and cognitive strategies.
• Motor Reproduction: Children’s physical abilities and motor skills affect their capacity to reproduce observed behaviours.
• Motivational Processes: Individual goals, values, and self-efficacy beliefs influence whether a child is motivated to reproduce observed behaviours.

In Early Years practice, this means:

1. Providing diverse learning opportunities to cater to different learning styles and preferences
2. Offering multiple exposures to key concepts or skills
3. Adapting teaching strategies to suit individual children’s needs and abilities
4. Recognising that children may learn at different rates or through different means, even when exposed to the same models

By acknowledging these individual differences, practitioners can create more inclusive and effective learning environments based on Social Learning Theory principles (Bandura, 1986).

Self-Efficacy

How can I build self-efficacy in young children who are struggling with a particular skill?

Building self-efficacy in young children who are struggling involves several strategies:

• Scaffold Tasks: Break the skill into smaller, manageable steps. Success in these smaller tasks builds confidence for tackling larger challenges.
• Verbal Persuasion: Offer specific, genuine praise for effort and progress. Use phrases like “You’re working hard at this” rather than general praise like “Good job”.
• Vicarious Experiences: Pair struggling children with slightly more advanced peers. Seeing similar others succeed can boost belief in one’s own abilities.
• Manage Physiological States: Help children recognise and manage feelings of frustration or anxiety. Teaching simple breathing exercises or providing a calm-down space can be helpful.
• Celebrate Small Wins: Acknowledge and celebrate incremental progress. This reinforces the link between effort and improvement.

Remember, according to Bandura, self-efficacy is built through multiple sources of information. By providing diverse opportunities for success and positive reinforcement, you can help build a child’s belief in their ability to master new skills (Bandura, 1997).

Is self-efficacy the same as self-esteem? How do they relate in early childhood development?

Self-efficacy and self-esteem are related but distinct concepts in child development:

• Self-Efficacy: This refers to a child’s belief in their ability to succeed in specific situations or accomplish particular tasks. It’s domain-specific and can vary across different areas of a child’s life.
• Self-Esteem: This is a more global evaluation of self-worth and value. It’s a broader concept that encompasses how a child feels about themselves overall.

The relationship between these concepts in early childhood:

1. Mutual Influence: High self-efficacy in multiple areas can contribute to positive self-esteem. Conversely, positive self-esteem can provide a supportive foundation for developing self-efficacy in new areas.
2. Different Focuses: Self-efficacy focuses on “Can I do it?”, while self-esteem asks “Am I a good person?”.
3. Development: In early childhood, self-efficacy beliefs start to form as children engage in various tasks and receive feedback. Self-esteem develops alongside this, influenced by a broader range of experiences and relationships.

In Early Years practice, it’s important to foster both. Providing opportunities for children to build self-efficacy in various domains can contribute to a healthy sense of self-esteem (Bandura, 1997; Harter, 2012).

How does self-efficacy develop in early childhood?

Self-efficacy development in early childhood is a dynamic process influenced by various factors:

1. Mastery Experiences: Young children develop self-efficacy through successful completion of age-appropriate tasks. Early Years practitioners can support this by:
   • Providing achievable challenges
   • Breaking complex tasks into manageable steps
   • Offering timely support and guidance
2. Vicarious Experiences: Children observe peers and adults successfully completing tasks, which can boost their own self-efficacy. Practitioners can:
   • Use peer modelling in learning activities
   • Demonstrate tasks while verbalising strategies
3. Social Persuasion: Positive feedback and encouragement from adults and peers contribute to self-efficacy. It’s important to:
   • Offer specific, genuine praise focused on effort and strategy use
   • Encourage children to persevere through challenges
4. Emotional and Physiological States: Young children’s interpretation of their physical and emotional reactions influences self-efficacy. Practitioners can:
   • Help children recognise and manage their emotions
   • Create a supportive, low-stress learning environment
5. Early Relationships: Secure attachments with caregivers provide a foundation for exploring and learning, contributing to self-efficacy development.

Understanding these processes allows Early Years professionals to intentionally foster self-efficacy in young children, supporting their overall development and learning (Bandura, 1997; Schunk & Pajares, 2009).

How can I assess and monitor self-efficacy in young children?

Assessing self-efficacy in young children requires age-appropriate methods that account for their developmental stage:

1. Observational Assessments:
   • Watch children’s persistence with tasks
   • Note their willingness to try new challenges
   • Observe their emotional responses to success and failure
2. Simple Self-Report Measures:
   • Use picture scales where children point to faces showing different emotions
   • Ask children to rate how sure they are about completing a task using a simple scale (e.g., “not sure”, “a little sure”, “very sure”)
3. Task-Specific Assessments:
   • Before a task, ask children how well they think they’ll do
   • After completion, discuss their performance and feelings
4. Narrative Approaches:
   • Engage children in conversations about their abilities
   • Use storytelling or puppet play to explore children’s beliefs about their capabilities
5. Parent and Teacher Reports:
   • Gather information from adults who regularly interact with the child
   • Use structured questionnaires or checklists designed for this purpose
6. Portfolio Assessments:
   • Collect samples of children’s work over time
   • Discuss these with children to gauge their perceptions of progress and capability

Remember, self-efficacy is domain-specific, so assessments should focus on particular skills or areas of development. Regular monitoring allows practitioners to track changes in children’s self-efficacy and adjust support strategies accordingly (Pastorelli et al., 2001; Marsh et al., 2002).

Bobo Doll Experiment

What were the main findings of the Bobo Doll experiment, and how do they apply to Early Years settings?

The Bobo Doll experiment, conducted by Bandura in 1961, yielded several key findings:

1. Observational Learning: Children who observed aggressive behaviour towards the doll were more likely to imitate that behaviour, demonstrating that new behaviours can be acquired through observation.
2. Gender Differences: Boys were more likely to imitate physical aggression, especially when the model was male. Girls were more likely to imitate verbal aggression.
3. Vicarious Reinforcement: Children who saw the aggressive behaviour rewarded were more likely to imitate it than those who saw it punished.

Applications to Early Years settings:

• Positive Role Modelling: Educators should be conscious of their own behaviour, as children are likely to imitate it.
• Peer Interactions: Careful consideration should be given to grouping children, as they learn from peer models as well.
• Media Exposure: The experiment highlights the potential influence of aggressive content in media on children’s behaviour.
• Reinforcement Strategies: The findings underscore the importance of consistently reinforcing positive behaviours and not inadvertently rewarding negative ones.

These insights emphasise the powerful role of observational learning in early childhood and the responsibility of Early Years professionals to create positive learning environments (Bandura et al., 1961).

How has the Bobo Doll experiment been critiqued, and what are its limitations?

The Bobo Doll experiment, while groundbreaking, has faced several critiques:

1. Ecological Validity: Critics argue that the laboratory setting may not reflect real-world situations, potentially limiting the generalisation of findings to everyday contexts.
2. Ethical Concerns: The experiment involved exposing children to aggressive behaviour, raising questions about the ethical implications of such research.
3. Short-Term Effects: The study primarily measured immediate effects, leaving questions about the long-term impact of observed aggression.
4. Cultural Bias: The original study was conducted with a specific demographic, potentially limiting its applicability across diverse cultural contexts.
5. Alternative Explanations: Some argue that the children’s behaviour could be explained by factors other than observational learning, such as increased arousal or disinhibition.

Limitations for Early Years practice:

• Complexity of Real-World Behaviour: Early Years professionals should recognise that children’s behaviour in real-world settings is influenced by many factors beyond simple observation.
• Individual Differences: The experiment doesn’t account for individual differences in children’s susceptibility to observational learning.
• Positive Modelling: While the experiment focused on negative behaviours, its principles can be applied to the modelling of positive behaviours in Early Years settings.

Despite these critiques, the Bobo Doll experiment remains influential, highlighting the importance of social learning. Early Years practitioners should consider its insights alongside other theories and current research when developing strategies for supporting children’s social and emotional development (Ferguson, 2010; Hart & Kritsonis, 2006).

How has technology changed the relevance of the Bobo Doll experiment in modern Early Years settings?

The advent of digital technology has both reinforced and challenged the relevance of the Bobo Doll experiment in modern Early Years settings:

1. Expanded Media Exposure: Children now have access to a wider range of media, potentially increasing their exposure to modelled behaviours:
   • Digital devices provide numerous opportunities for observational learning
   • Online content may not always be age-appropriate or monitored
2. Virtual Role Models: Children may now observe and imitate behaviours from virtual characters:
   • Educational apps and games can provide positive models
   • Social media influencers may become significant role models
3. Interactive Learning: Digital technology allows for more interactive forms of observational learning:
   • Educational software can provide immediate feedback on imitated behaviours
   • Virtual reality experiences can create immersive learning environments
4. Screen Time Concerns: The increase in screen-based activities raises new questions about the balance between digital and physical play:
   • Physical imitation, as seen in the Bobo Doll experiment, may be less frequent
   • The long-term effects of increased digital modelling are still being studied
5. Digital Citizenship: The experiment’s principles now extend to teaching appropriate online behaviour:
   • Early Years settings must consider how to model positive digital interactions
   • Children need guidance on interpreting and responding to online social cues

While the core principles of the Bobo Doll experiment remain relevant, Early Years practitioners must now consider how these apply in both physical and digital contexts. The experiment’s findings on observational learning continue to inform approaches to media literacy and digital safeguarding in Early Years settings (Kirkorian et al., 2008; Chassiakos et al., 2016).

How does the Bobo Doll experiment relate to current understandings of empathy development in young children?

The Bobo Doll experiment, while focused on aggression, provides insights into empathy development in young children:

1. Observational Learning of Emotions: Just as children imitated aggressive behaviours, they can also learn empathetic responses through observation:
   • Early Years settings can model caring and supportive behaviours
   • Practitioners can narrate their own empathetic responses to situations
2. Role of Consequences: The experiment showed that children were more likely to imitate behaviours that were rewarded:
   • Positive reinforcement of empathetic behaviours can encourage their repetition
   • Discussing the positive outcomes of kind actions can motivate children to be empathetic
3. Gender Differences: The original experiment noted gender differences in imitation, which relates to empathy development:
   • Early Years practitioners should be aware of potential gender stereotypes in emotional expression
   • Provide diverse models of empathy across genders
4. Media Influence: The experiment highlighted media’s potential influence, which extends to empathy:
   • Carefully select media that models empathetic behaviours
   • Discuss characters’ emotions and responses in stories and videos
5. Social-Cognitive Development: The ability to imitate complex social behaviours relates to perspective-taking skills:
   • As children develop cognitively, their capacity for empathy increases
   • Activities that encourage perspective-taking can support empathy development
6. Environmental Factors: The experiment emphasised the role of environment, which is crucial in empathy development:
   • Create a classroom culture that values and practices empathy
   • Engage families to reinforce empathetic behaviours at home

By understanding these connections, Early Years practitioners can use the insights from the Bobo Doll experiment to foster empathy alongside other social-emotional skills. This approach supports children’s holistic development and creates a positive, caring learning environment (Eisenberg et al., 2006; Hoffman, 2000).

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
• Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269-290.
• Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.
• Chassiakos, Y. L. R., Radesky, J., Christakis, D., Moreno, M. A., & Cross, C. (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162593.
• Chen, C., & Uttal, D. H. (1988). Cultural values, parents’ beliefs, and children’s achievement in the United States and China. Human Development, 31(6), 351-358.
• Department for Education. (2021). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. Gov.uk.
• Durkin, K. (1995). Developmental social psychology: From infancy to old age. Blackwell.
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
• Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 646-718). John Wiley & Sons.
• Ferguson, C. J. (2010). Blazing angels or resident evil? Can violent video games be a force for good? Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 68-81.
• Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. A., Cook, E. T., & Quamma, J. P. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7(1), 117-136.
• Hart, J. K., & Kritsonis, W. (2006). Critical analysis of an original writing on social learning theory: Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models by: Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross and Sheila A. Ross. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 1-7.
• Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.
• Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.
• Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653-670.
• Kirkorian, H. L., Wartella, E. A., & Anderson, D. R. (2008). Media and young children’s learning. The Future of Children, 18(1), 39-61.
• Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237-1245.
• Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A., & Craven, R. G. (2002). How do preschool children feel about themselves? Unraveling measurement and multidimensional self-concept structure. Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 376-393.
• Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238.
• Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284-288.
• O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804.
• Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Educational psychology: Developing learners (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Pastorelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Rola, J., Rozsa, S., & Bandura, A. (2001). The structure of children’s perceived self-efficacy: A cross-national study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 87-97.
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. Handbook of Motivation at School, 2, 34-54.
• Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35-53). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). Head Start Program Performance Standards. Administration for Children and Families.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2003). Albert Bandura: The scholar and his contributions to educational psychology. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 431-457). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
• Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2019). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 11-26). Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34382/chapter/290836425
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543-578. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00346543066004543
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X99910160

Recommended Books

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Self-Efficacy-Exercise-Control-Albert-Bandura/dp/0716728508
  • This seminal work provides a comprehensive exploration of self-efficacy theory and its applications across various domains.
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Motivation-and-Self-Regulated-Learning-Theory-Research-and-Applications/Schunk-Zimmerman/p/book/9780805858983
  • This book offers practical insights into applying Bandura’s theories to enhance motivation and self-regulated learning in educational settings.
• Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Information Age Publishing. https://www.infoagepub.com/products/Self-Efficacy-Beliefs-of-Adolescents
  • This collection provides a comprehensive overview of self-efficacy research in adolescence, with implications for Early Years practice.
• Maddux, J. E. (Ed.). (2013). Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781489914651
  • This book explores the role of self-efficacy in various aspects of human adaptation and adjustment, offering valuable insights for Early Years professionals.

Recommended Websites

• The Bandura Lab: https://albertbandura.com/
  • This official website provides access to Bandura’s publications, videos, and other resources related to his theories.
• American Psychological Association – Albert Bandura: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-37102-001
  • This page offers a comprehensive overview of Bandura’s contributions to psychology and education.
• Social Learning Theory (Bandura) – Learning Theories: https://www.learning-theories.com/social-learning-theory-bandura.html
  • This website provides a concise summary of Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, along with its implications for education.
• Self-Efficacy: Why Believing in Yourself Matters – Verywell Mind: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-efficacy-2795954
  • This resource offers practical insights into self-efficacy and its importance in various life domains, including education.
• The Education Hub – Social Learning Theory: https://theeducationhub.org.nz/social-emotional-learning/
  • This website provides practical resources and articles for educators on applying Social Learning Theory in educational settings.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile

To cite this article use:

Early Years TV Albert Bandura on Social Learning Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, Self-Efficacy and Bobo Doll. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/albert-bandura-on-social-learning-theory-social-cognitive-theory-self-efficacy-and-bobo-doll (Accessed: 10 December 2024).