Susan Isaacs: Pioneer of Play-Based Learning and Child Observation. A Comprehensive Guide for Early Years Professionals and Students

Susan Sutherland Isaacs transformed early childhood education in the 20th century. Her theories on play, observation, and emotional development continue to shape modern Early Years practice.

Isaacs, an influential educational theorist, emphasised the crucial role of play in child development. She pioneered observational techniques in early education and highlighted the importance of emotional development in learning.

Key aspects of Isaacs’s work include:

• Play-based learning: Isaacs viewed play as essential for cognitive and emotional growth.
• Observational approach: She developed detailed observation methods to understand children’s needs and behaviours.
• Emotional development: Isaacs stressed the importance of emotional literacy in early learning.

These ideas influence current Early Years practice, including the Early Years Foundation Stage curriculum in England. Practitioners use Isaacs’s theories to design play-based learning environments, implement observational assessment techniques, and foster children’s emotional development.

This article explores Isaacs’s background, key theories, and their practical applications in Early Years settings. It compares her work with other influential theorists, examines criticisms of her approach, and considers the ongoing relevance of her ideas in modern early childhood education.

For Early Years professionals, educators, and students, understanding Isaacs’s contributions provides valuable insights into promoting children’s holistic development and creating effective learning environments.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction and Background to Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s Work

Susan Sutherland Isaacs transformed early childhood education in the 20th century. Her pioneering work on child development and learning reshaped educational practices. This article examines Isaacs’s theories, their implementation, and their enduring impact on Early Years education.

Early Life and Education

Susan Sutherland Isaacs was born on 24 May 1885 in Turton, Lancashire. She was the daughter of William Fairhurst, a journalist and Methodist lay preacher. Isaacs’s mother died when she was six, an event that profoundly influenced her later work on child development (Graham, 2008).

• Educated at the Bolton Secondary School and the University of Manchester
• Studied philosophy and psychology at the University of Cambridge
• Trained as a psychoanalyst under John Carl Flügel

Historical Context

Isaacs developed her theories during a period of significant change in education and psychology:

• Rise of progressive education movement
• Growing interest in child-centred learning
• Emergence of psychoanalytic theory

The work of John Dewey and Maria Montessori influenced the educational landscape of the time (Drummond, 2000).

Key Influences

Isaacs’s approach was shaped by several key influences:

• Psychoanalytic theory: Particularly the work of Sigmund Freud and Melanie Klein
• Progressive education: John Dewey’s ideas on experiential learning
• Developmental psychology: Jean Piaget’s theories of cognitive development

These influences are evident in Isaacs’s emphasis on play, emotional development, and the importance of observation in understanding children’s behaviour.

Main Concepts and Theories

Isaacs is known for several key concepts:

• Intellectual growth through play: Children learn best through self-directed play and exploration
• Importance of emotions: Emotional development is crucial for overall child development
• Value of observation: Careful observation is essential for understanding children’s needs and behaviours

Her book “Intellectual Growth in Young Children” (1930) outlined these ideas and their practical applications in Early Years settings.

Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s Key Concepts and Theories

Susan Sutherland Isaacs developed influential theories on child development and learning. Her work emphasised the importance of play, emotional development, and careful observation. These ideas significantly shaped Early Years education practices and our understanding of child development.

Intellectual Growth Through Play

Isaacs believed children learn best through self-directed play and exploration. This concept forms the cornerstone of her educational philosophy.

• Play as a learning tool: Children use play to understand their world and develop cognitive skills.
• Self-directed learning: Children should have freedom to choose their activities and explore their interests.
• Role of the educator: Adults should provide a rich environment and support, rather than direct children’s play.

Isaacs observed that children’s play often involves problem-solving and experimentation. She noted, “Play is the child’s work” (Isaacs, 1930, p. 425). This approach contrasted with more structured teaching methods prevalent at the time.

Examples of Intellectual Growth Through Play:

• A child building with blocks develops spatial awareness and basic physics concepts.
• Pretend play helps children understand social roles and develop language skills.
• Outdoor exploration encourages scientific observation and physical development.

The Importance of Emotions in Development

Isaacs emphasised the crucial role of emotional development in overall child growth. She drew heavily on psychoanalytic theory in this aspect of her work.

• Emotional security: A child’s emotional wellbeing forms the foundation for learning and social development.
• Expression of feelings: Children should be encouraged to express and understand their emotions.
• Adult role: Educators and caregivers should provide emotional support and help children navigate their feelings.

Isaacs argued that cognitive and emotional development are interlinked. She wrote, “The child’s intellectual progress is bound up with his emotional life” (Isaacs, 1933, p. 306).

The Value of Observation

Careful observation forms a key part of Isaacs’s approach to understanding and supporting children’s development.

• Detailed record-keeping: Isaacs advocated for systematic observation and documentation of children’s behaviour.
• Interpretation of behaviour: Observations should be used to understand children’s thoughts, feelings, and needs.
• Informing practice: Educators should use their observations to adapt their approach and environment to support each child’s development.

Isaacs’s emphasis on observation was revolutionary for its time. She stated, “The teacher must be a naturalist, observing each child’s behaviour as closely and objectively as possible” (Isaacs, 1932, p. 173).

Relationships Between Concepts and Theories

Isaacs’s key concepts are deeply interconnected:

• Play provides opportunities for both intellectual growth and emotional development.
• Careful observation informs how adults can support play and emotional growth.
• Emotional security enables children to engage more fully in exploratory play.

For example, a child feeling emotionally secure is more likely to engage in complex, imaginative play, which in turn supports their cognitive development. An observant educator can recognise this process and provide appropriate support.

Developmental Progression in Isaacs’s Theory

While Isaacs did not propose a rigid stage theory, she observed patterns in children’s development:

• Early infancy: Focus on sensory experiences and building trust with caregivers.
• Toddlerhood: Emergence of symbolic thought and language development.
• Preschool years: Increase in complex play, social interactions, and questioning.
• Early school years: Development of logical thinking and more advanced social skills.

Isaacs emphasised that this progression is fluid and varies between children. She noted, “Each child has his own tempo of growth” (Isaacs, 1930, p. 52).

Isaacs’s theories continue to influence Early Years education, emphasising the importance of play-based learning, emotional development, and observant, responsive teaching.

Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s Contributions to the Field of Education and Child Development

Impact on Educational Practices

Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s work has significantly influenced educational practices, particularly in Early Years settings. Her emphasis on play-based learning and child-centred approaches has reshaped classroom environments and teaching methods.

Key impacts include:

• Child-centred learning environments: Many nurseries and preschools now design spaces that encourage exploration and self-directed play. For example, the Reggio Emilia approach, which shares many principles with Isaacs’s work, uses open-ended materials and flexible spaces to support children’s curiosity (Edwards et al., 2011).
• Observation-based assessment: Isaacs’s emphasis on careful observation has led to the widespread use of learning journals and observational assessment in Early Years settings. The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) in England incorporates this approach, encouraging practitioners to use observations to plan for individual children’s needs (Department for Education, 2021).
• Emotional literacy: Isaacs’s focus on emotional development has influenced the integration of social and emotional learning in curricula. For instance, the PATHS (Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies) programme, used in many UK schools, draws on principles similar to those espoused by Isaacs (Domitrovich et al., 2007).

Shaping our Understanding of Child Development

Isaacs’s theories have deepened our understanding of child development, particularly in the areas of cognitive and emotional growth.

Key contributions include:

• Integrated view of development: Isaacs’s work highlighted the interconnectedness of cognitive, emotional, and social development. This holistic approach is now widely accepted in developmental psychology (Whitebread, 2012).
• Importance of play: Her emphasis on play as a crucial learning tool has been supported by subsequent research. For example, studies have shown that pretend play enhances children’s executive function skills (Diamond & Lee, 2011).
• Emotional development: Isaacs’s focus on emotional development as fundamental to learning has influenced theories of emotional intelligence and social-emotional learning. This is evident in programmes like the Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning (SEAL) initiative in UK schools (Humphrey et al., 2010).

Relevance to Contemporary Education

Isaacs’s ideas remain highly relevant to contemporary education, influencing current practices and research.

Examples of ongoing relevance:

• Play-based learning: The importance of play in early education continues to be emphasised in curricula worldwide. For instance, the Australian Early Years Learning Framework explicitly recognises play as a context for learning (Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, 2009).
• Outdoor learning: Isaacs’s advocacy for outdoor play aligns with current trends in forest schools and nature-based learning. The Forest School movement in the UK, which began in the 1990s, shares many principles with Isaacs’s approach to outdoor exploration (O’Brien & Murray, 2007).
• Personalised learning: Isaacs’s emphasis on observing and responding to individual children’s interests aligns with contemporary approaches to personalised learning. Digital learning journals, such as Tapestry, used in many UK nurseries, facilitate this individualised approach (Kucirkova, 2017).
• Emotional wellbeing: The current focus on children’s mental health and wellbeing in education policy echoes Isaacs’s emphasis on emotional development. The UK government’s recent initiatives on mental health in schools reflect this ongoing concern (Department of Health and Social Care & Department for Education, 2017).

Isaacs’s theories continue to shape Early Years practice, influencing how educators approach child development, learning environments, and assessment. Her work remains a cornerstone of child-centred, play-based approaches to early education.

Criticisms and Limitations of Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s Theories and Concepts

Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s work, while influential, has faced criticisms and limitations. These critiques focus on her research methods, key concepts, and contextual considerations. Understanding these limitations provides a more comprehensive view of Isaacs’s theories and their application in Early Years settings.

Criticisms of Research Methods

• Limited sample size: Isaacs’s observations at the Malting House School involved a small number of children from privileged backgrounds. This limitation raises questions about the generalisability of her findings to diverse populations (Graham, 2008).
• Potential observer bias: As both the teacher and researcher, Isaacs’s dual role may have influenced her observations and interpretations. This potential bias could affect the objectivity of her findings (Aldridge, 2016).
• Lack of systematic data collection: While Isaacs’s observations were detailed, her methods lacked the rigour of modern research standards. This limitation makes it challenging to replicate or validate her findings (Brehony, 2000).

Challenges to Key Concepts or Theories

• Overemphasis on psychoanalytic theory: Isaacs’s heavy reliance on psychoanalytic concepts has been criticised as potentially limiting her interpretation of children’s behaviour. Some argue this approach may oversimplify complex developmental processes (Drummond, 2000).
• Neglect of social and cultural factors: Isaacs’s focus on individual psychology has been critiqued for not fully accounting for the role of social and cultural contexts in shaping development. This limitation is particularly relevant in today’s diverse Early Years settings (Brehony, 2000).
• Idealisation of play: Some critics argue that Isaacs’s emphasis on free play may undervalue the role of structured learning experiences. This critique suggests a need for balance between child-led and adult-guided activities in Early Years education (Wood, 2013).

Contextual and Cultural Limitations

• Socioeconomic bias: Isaacs’s work primarily involved children from affluent backgrounds. This limitation raises questions about the applicability of her theories to children from diverse socioeconomic contexts (Graham, 2008).
• Cultural specificity: Isaacs’s theories were developed in a specific cultural and historical context. This limitation highlights the need to consider cultural variations in child-rearing practices and developmental expectations (Aldridge, 2016).
• Gender considerations: Some critics argue that Isaacs’s work did not sufficiently address gender differences in development and play behaviours. This limitation is particularly relevant in light of contemporary understanding of gender in Early Years education (Drummond, 2000).

Addressing the Criticisms and Limitations in Practice

Despite these criticisms, Isaacs’s work continues to offer valuable insights for Early Years practice. Educators can address these limitations by:

• Combining approaches: Integrating Isaacs’s ideas with other theoretical perspectives can provide a more comprehensive understanding of child development. For example, combining Isaacs’s emphasis on play with Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory can offer a more balanced approach (Wood, 2013).
• Culturally responsive practice: Adapting Isaacs’s theories to diverse cultural contexts ensures their relevance in multicultural Early Years settings. This approach involves considering cultural variations in play, learning, and development (Aldridge, 2016).
• Critical reflection: Encouraging practitioners to critically reflect on their observations and interpretations can help mitigate potential biases. This practice aligns with Isaacs’s emphasis on observation while addressing concerns about objectivity (Brehony, 2000).
• Balanced curriculum: Incorporating both child-led and adult-guided activities can address concerns about overemphasis on free play. This balanced approach supports children’s agency while ensuring exposure to key learning experiences (Wood, 2013).

Isaacs’s theories, despite their limitations, provide a valuable foundation for understanding child development. By acknowledging these critiques and adapting her ideas to contemporary contexts, Early Years professionals can effectively apply Isaacs’s insights in their practice.

Practical Applications of Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s Work

Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s theories offer valuable insights for Early Years practice. Her ideas on play-based learning, observation, and emotional development inform curriculum design, classroom management, and family engagement. Applying these concepts can enhance children’s learning experiences and support their holistic development.

Application in Curriculum and Lesson Planning

Isaacs’s emphasis on play and child-led learning influences curriculum design in Early Years settings:

• Open-ended play spaces: Create areas that encourage exploration and creativity. For example, a ‘loose parts’ area with natural materials allows children to construct, sort, and imagine freely (Nicholson, 1972).
• Project-based learning: Develop long-term projects based on children’s interests. A class investigating insects after finding a beetle in the garden aligns with Isaacs’s belief in following children’s curiosity (Katz & Chard, 2000).
• Outdoor learning: Incorporate regular outdoor experiences. Forest School programmes, which emphasise outdoor exploration and risk-taking, reflect Isaacs’s views on the importance of outdoor play (O’Brien & Murray, 2007).
• Observation-based planning: Use detailed observations to inform curriculum decisions. Learning journals that document children’s play and interests help educators plan responsive activities (Dubiel, 2014).

Strategies for Classroom Management and Interaction

Isaacs’s insights into child development inform approaches to classroom management:

• Emotional literacy: Implement strategies to help children identify and express their emotions. The ‘Colour Monster’ activity, where children associate colours with feelings, supports emotional awareness (Llenas, 2012).
• Conflict resolution: Encourage children to resolve conflicts independently. The High/Scope approach’s six-step conflict resolution process aligns with Isaacs’s emphasis on social learning through play (Hohmann & Weikart, 2002).
• Positive behaviour support: Use positive reinforcement and natural consequences. The ‘Incredible Years’ programme, which focuses on building positive relationships, reflects Isaacs’s views on emotional development (Webster-Stratton, 2011).
• Child-led routines: Involve children in creating and maintaining classroom routines. Picture schedules that children can manipulate support autonomy and understanding of daily rhythms (Epstein, 2014).

Engaging Families and Communities

Isaacs’s holistic approach to child development extends to family and community engagement:

• Learning stories: Share detailed narratives of children’s learning with families. This approach, developed in New Zealand, aligns with Isaacs’s emphasis on observation and documentation (Carr & Lee, 2012).
• Parent workshops: Offer sessions on play-based learning and child development. These workshops help parents understand and support their child’s learning at home (Whalley, 2017).
• Community projects: Involve children in local community initiatives. A class project to create a community garden reflects Isaacs’s belief in real-world learning experiences (Sobel, 2004).
• Cultural celebrations: Incorporate diverse cultural celebrations into the curriculum. This practice respects families’ backgrounds and broadens children’s cultural awareness (Siraj-Blatchford & Clarke, 2000).

Overcoming Challenges and Barriers to Implementation

Implementing Isaacs’s ideas can face obstacles, but creative solutions exist:

• Resource constraints: Use natural and recycled materials for play. This approach aligns with Isaacs’s emphasis on open-ended materials while being cost-effective (Nicholson, 1972).
• Time pressures: Integrate observation into daily routines. Short, focused observations can be as valuable as lengthy ones (Dubiel, 2014).
• Balancing structure and freedom: Create a flexible daily schedule that allows for both structured activities and free play. This approach addresses concerns about academic readiness while honouring Isaacs’s play-based philosophy (Wood, 2013).
• Professional development: Engage in regular reflective practice and peer observation. These practices support ongoing learning and adaptation of Isaacs’s ideas (Whalley, 2017).

Isaacs’s theories, when thoughtfully applied, can enrich Early Years practice. By focusing on play, observation, and emotional development, educators create environments that support children’s natural curiosity and learning. Adapting these ideas to specific contexts ensures their relevance in diverse Early Years settings.

Comparing Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s Ideas with Other Theorists

Understanding Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s theories in relation to other prominent child development theorists provides a comprehensive view of Early Years education. This comparison highlights the interconnectedness of various approaches and their practical implications. We will compare Isaacs’s ideas with those of Maria Montessori, Jean Piaget, and Lev Vygotsky.

Comparison with Maria Montessori

Maria Montessori, an Italian physician and educator, developed a child-centred educational approach emphasising independence, freedom within limits, and respect for children’s natural development (Montessori, 1912).

Similarities:

• Child-centred approach: Both Isaacs and Montessori emphasised the importance of following the child’s lead in learning.
• Prepared environment: Both theorists stressed the significance of a carefully curated learning environment.
• Observation: Both advocated for careful observation of children to understand their needs and interests.

Differences:

• Structure: Montessori’s approach is more structured, with specific materials and activities, while Isaacs favoured more open-ended play.
• Role of imagination: Isaacs placed greater emphasis on imaginative play, while Montessori focused more on reality-based activities.
• Adult intervention: Isaacs encouraged more adult intervention in children’s play, while Montessori emphasised children’s independent exploration.

For example, in a Montessori classroom, children might work with specific materials designed to teach mathematical concepts, while in an Isaacs-inspired setting, children might explore mathematical ideas through open-ended block play or dramatic play scenarios.

Read our in-depth article on Maria Montessori here.

Comparison with Jean Piaget

Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, developed a theory of cognitive development that describes how children’s thinking evolves through distinct stages (Piaget, 1952).

Similarities:

• Constructivist approach: Both Isaacs and Piaget viewed children as active constructors of their own knowledge.
• Importance of play: Both recognised play as crucial for children’s cognitive development.
• Child-centred learning: Both emphasised the importance of following children’s interests and readiness.

Differences:

• Developmental stages: Piaget proposed distinct stages of cognitive development, while Isaacs focused less on fixed stages.
• Social factors: Isaacs placed greater emphasis on social and emotional factors in learning than Piaget.
• Language development: Isaacs stressed the role of language in cognitive development more than Piaget.

In practice, a Piagetian approach might involve providing materials appropriate to a child’s developmental stage, while an Isaacs-inspired approach might focus more on observing and extending children’s play based on their individual interests and emotional needs.

Read our in-depth article on Jean Piaget here.

Comparison with Lev Vygotsky

Lev Vygotsky, a Soviet psychologist, developed the sociocultural theory of cognitive development, emphasising the role of social interaction and culture in learning (Vygotsky, 1978).

Similarities:

• Social interaction: Both Isaacs and Vygotsky recognised the importance of social interaction in learning.
• Role of language: Both emphasised the crucial role of language in cognitive development.
• Adult support: Both acknowledged the importance of adult guidance in children’s learning.

Differences:

• Cultural context: Vygotsky placed greater emphasis on the role of cultural context in shaping development.
• Zone of Proximal Development: Vygotsky’s concept of ZPD is more structured than Isaacs’s approach to adult intervention.
• Play: While both valued play, Vygotsky focused more on its role in developing abstract thinking.

In an Early Years setting, a Vygotskian approach might involve more structured scaffolding of children’s learning, while an Isaacs-inspired approach might focus more on creating rich play environments and observing children’s spontaneous learning.

Read our in-depth article on Lev Vygotsky here.

Synthesis and Implications for Practice

Understanding these comparisons can enhance Early Years practice by:

• Encouraging a balanced approach that incorporates structured learning opportunities and free play.
• Emphasising the importance of both individual exploration and social interaction in learning.
• Recognising the role of culture and context in shaping children’s development.

For example, an Early Years practitioner might create a learning environment that includes Montessori-inspired materials, Piagetian consideration of developmental stages, Vygotskian opportunities for social learning, and Isaacs’s emphasis on emotional development and open-ended play.

Limitations and Challenges of Comparing Theorists

Comparing theorists presents challenges:

• Historical context: Each theorist worked in a specific historical and cultural context, influencing their ideas.
• Evolving understanding: Our knowledge of child development has advanced since these theories were first proposed.
• Oversimplification: Comparisons risk oversimplifying complex ideas and nuanced approaches.

Practitioners should approach these comparisons critically, recognising that no single theory fully explains child development. Integrating multiple perspectives can provide a richer understanding of children’s learning and development.

Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s Legacy and Ongoing Influence

Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s work continues to shape child development understanding and Early Years practice. Her influence extends to contemporary research, educational policy, and professional practice. Understanding Isaacs’s legacy provides valuable insights for Early Years professionals and students, informing current approaches to child development and education.

Impact on Contemporary Research

Isaacs’s ideas have inspired ongoing research in child development:

• Play-based learning: Recent studies have built upon Isaacs’s emphasis on play. For example, Whitebread et al. (2017) investigated the role of play in developing children’s self-regulation skills, finding that playful learning environments support executive function development.
• Emotional development: Isaacs’s focus on emotional aspects of learning continues to influence research. The work of Denham et al. (2012) on emotional competence in early childhood draws on Isaacs’s ideas, highlighting the importance of emotional literacy for children’s social and academic success.
• Observational methods: Isaacs’s detailed observational approach has informed modern research methodologies. The ‘Effective Provision of Pre-School Education’ (EPPE) project in the UK used systematic observation techniques reminiscent of Isaacs’s methods to study the effects of preschool education (Sylva et al., 2004).

Influence on Educational Policy and Curriculum

Isaacs’s theories have shaped Early Years policy and curriculum development:

• Play-based curricula: The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) in England incorporates Isaacs’s emphasis on play-based learning. The EYFS framework states that “play is essential for children’s development, building their confidence as they learn to explore” (Department for Education, 2021, p. 16).
• Child-centred approach: New Zealand’s Te Whāriki curriculum, which emphasises holistic development and learning through play, reflects Isaacs’s child-centred philosophy (Ministry of Education, 2017).
• Observation and assessment: The Learning Story approach, developed in New Zealand and now used internationally, aligns with Isaacs’s emphasis on detailed observation and documentation of children’s learning (Carr & Lee, 2012).

Ongoing Relevance for Professional Practice

Isaacs’s ideas continue to inform Early Years professional practice:

• Emotional literacy: The ‘Colour Monster’ approach, used in many UK nurseries to help children identify and express emotions, reflects Isaacs’s emphasis on emotional development (Llenas, 2012).
• Open-ended resources: The ‘loose parts’ play philosophy, popular in many Early Years settings, aligns with Isaacs’s belief in providing open-ended materials for children’s exploration (Nicholson, 1972).
• Parent partnerships: Isaacs’s holistic view of child development informs current approaches to parent engagement. For example, the ‘Parents as Partners’ initiative in UK nurseries encourages sharing detailed observations of children’s learning with families (Whalley, 2017).

Current Developments and Future Directions of Isaacs’s Work

While Isaacs’s legacy is significant, contemporary research continues to refine and extend her ideas:

• Cultural considerations: Current research is addressing the need to consider cultural diversity in applying Isaacs’s theories. For example, Brooker (2010) explores how cultural beliefs about play and learning influence Early Years practice in diverse communities.
• Digital play: As technology becomes more prevalent in children’s lives, researchers are exploring how Isaacs’s ideas about play apply to digital contexts. Edwards (2013) investigates how digital play can support children’s learning and development.
• Neuroscience connections: Emerging neuroscience research is providing biological evidence for some of Isaacs’s intuitions about child development. For instance, studies on brain plasticity support Isaacs’s emphasis on rich, stimulating environments for young children (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000).

Isaacs’s work continues to evolve through ongoing research and practice. Early Years professionals are encouraged to engage critically with her ideas, considering how they can be adapted and extended to meet the needs of diverse children in contemporary contexts. The enduring relevance of Isaacs’s theories underscores the importance of child-centred, play-based approaches in supporting children’s holistic development.

Conclusion

Susan Sutherland Isaacs’s work has profoundly influenced Early Years education and child development theory. Her key contributions include:

• Play-based learning: Isaacs emphasised the crucial role of play in children’s cognitive and emotional development.
• Observational approach: She pioneered detailed observation as a method for understanding children’s needs and behaviours.
• Emotional development: Isaacs highlighted the importance of emotional literacy and well-being in early childhood.

These ideas have shaped our understanding of how children learn and develop, informing both theory and practice in Early Years education (Graham, 2008).

Isaacs’s theories have significant implications for Early Years practice:

• Child-centred curriculum: Practitioners can design learning environments that encourage exploration and self-directed play.
• Emotional literacy: Educators can implement strategies to help children identify and express their emotions, such as the ‘Colour Monster’ approach (Llenas, 2012).
• Parent partnerships: Isaacs’s holistic view supports strong home-school connections, as seen in initiatives like ‘Parents as Partners’ (Whalley, 2017).

These applications promote children’s holistic development, supporting their cognitive, social, and emotional growth.

While Isaacs’s ideas remain valuable, critical engagement is essential. Early Years professionals should:

• Consider context: Adapt Isaacs’s theories to diverse cultural and socioeconomic settings.
• Integrate new research: Incorporate insights from fields like neuroscience to refine and extend Isaacs’s ideas.
• Reflect on practice: Continuously evaluate the effectiveness of Isaacs-inspired approaches in their specific contexts.

Ongoing professional development and engagement with current research ensure that practice remains informed and effective (Brooker, 2010).

Early Years professionals and students are encouraged to:

• Apply and adapt: Use Isaacs’s ideas as a starting point, tailoring them to their unique settings and children’s needs.
• Share insights: Contribute to the ongoing dialogue about Early Years practice by sharing experiences and innovations with colleagues.
• Stay curious: Maintain a spirit of inquiry, continuing to question, learn, and refine their understanding of child development.

Isaacs’s enduring legacy offers a rich foundation for Early Years practice. By engaging critically with her ideas and combining them with contemporary insights, practitioners can create nurturing, stimulating environments that support children’s learning and development.

Frequently Asked Questions

How Did Isaacs’s Psychoanalytic Background Influence Her Educational Theories?

Isaacs’s psychoanalytic training significantly shaped her educational approach:

• Emotional development: She emphasised the importance of children’s emotional lives in learning.
• Play interpretation: Isaacs used psychoanalytic concepts to understand the symbolic meaning of children’s play.
• Unconscious processes: She considered how unconscious feelings and conflicts might influence children’s behaviour and learning.

For example, Isaacs interpreted children’s aggressive play as a healthy way of processing emotions rather than as problematic behaviour (Isaacs, 1933). This perspective influenced her advocacy for free play in educational settings.

What Was the Malting House School and Why Was It Significant?

The Malting House School was an experimental nursery school Isaacs ran from 1924 to 1927:

• Research site: It served as a ‘laboratory’ for observing children’s development and testing educational theories.
• Progressive approach: The school emphasised child-centred learning, free play, and minimal adult intervention.
• Influential findings: Observations from the school formed the basis of Isaacs’s influential books on child development.

The Malting House School demonstrated the practical application of Isaacs’s theories and provided evidence for the benefits of play-based learning (Graham, 2008).

How Does Isaacs’s Work Align with Current EYFS Guidelines in England?

Isaacs’s ideas align closely with several key aspects of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework:

• Learning through play: The EYFS emphasises play as essential for children’s development, echoing Isaacs’s core principle.
• Observation-based assessment: The EYFS advocates for ongoing observation to understand and support children’s learning, a practice Isaacs pioneered.
• Holistic development: Like Isaacs, the EYFS emphasises supporting children’s cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development.

For instance, the EYFS’s ‘Characteristics of Effective Learning’ reflect Isaacs’s focus on children as active learners and the importance of supporting their curiosity and independence (Department for Education, 2021).

How Can Isaacs’s Theories Be Applied in Settings with Limited Resources?

Isaacs’s approach can be adapted for resource-limited settings:

• Natural materials: Use freely available natural materials (sticks, leaves, stones) as open-ended play resources.
• Observational practice: Implement Isaacs’s observational techniques, which require time rather than expensive equipment.
• Child-led activities: Encourage child-initiated play and learning, which doesn’t rely on costly pre-planned activities.

For example, a ‘mud kitchen’ outdoors can provide rich learning experiences aligned with Isaacs’s principles, using minimal resources (White, 2011).

How Did Isaacs’s Views on Gender in Early Childhood Differ from Her Contemporaries?

Isaacs held progressive views on gender for her time:

• Equal potential: She believed boys and girls had equal intellectual and emotional capabilities.
• Non-stereotypical play: Isaacs encouraged all children to engage in a wide range of play activities, regardless of gender.
• Individual differences: She emphasised individual differences over gender differences in children’s development.

However, some of her writings still reflect the gender norms of her era. Contemporary practitioners should critically engage with these aspects of her work (Graham, 2008).

How Can Isaacs’s Theories Support Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND)?

Isaacs’s child-centred approach offers valuable insights for supporting children with SEND:

• Individual observation: Her emphasis on detailed observation helps identify each child’s unique needs and strengths.
• Emotional support: Isaacs’s focus on emotional development is particularly relevant for children who may struggle with social and emotional skills.
• Flexible learning environments: Her advocacy for adaptable, open-ended play spaces aligns with creating inclusive environments for children with diverse needs.

For instance, Isaacs’s approach to conflict resolution through supported play can be particularly beneficial for children with social communication difficulties (Wood, 2013).

How Does Isaacs’s Work Compare to Montessori’s Approach in Early Years Education?

While both Isaacs and Montessori advocated child-centred approaches, they differed in several key areas:

• Structure: Montessori favoured more structured activities with specific materials, while Isaacs emphasised free play.
• Adult role: Isaacs encouraged more active adult involvement in children’s play compared to Montessori’s emphasis on child independence.
• Fantasy play: Isaacs valued imaginative play, whereas Montessori focused more on reality-based activities.

Understanding these differences helps practitioners make informed decisions about their educational approach (Lillard, 2013).

What Criticisms Have Been Made of Isaacs’s Theories and How Have They Been Addressed?

Key criticisms of Isaacs’s work include:

• Limited sample: Her observations were based on a small group of privileged children, raising questions about generalisability.
• Overemphasis on psychoanalytic interpretation: Some argue her psychoanalytic lens led to overinterpretation of children’s behaviour.
• Lack of structure: Critics suggest her emphasis on free play might not adequately prepare children for formal schooling.

Contemporary practitioners address these criticisms by combining Isaacs’s insights with more diverse research samples, multi-disciplinary perspectives, and balanced approaches to structured and unstructured learning (Brehony, 2000).

References

• Aldridge, J. (2016). Revisiting Susan Isaacs – a modern educator for the 21st century. Early Child Development and Care, 186(5), 679-690.
• Brehony, K. J. (2000). The kindergarten in England, 1851–1918. In R. Wollons (Ed.), Kindergartens and cultures: The global diffusion of an idea (pp. 59-86). Yale University Press.
• Brooker, L. (2010). Learning to play in a cultural context. In P. Broadhead, J. Howard, & E. Wood (Eds.), Play and learning in the early years: From research to practice (pp. 27-42). SAGE Publications.
• Carr, M., & Lee, W. (2012). Learning stories: Constructing learner identities in early education. SAGE Publications.
• Denham, S. A., Bassett, H. H., & Zinsser, K. (2012). Early childhood teachers as socializers of young children’s emotional competence. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(3), 137-143.
• Department for Education. (2021). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework–2
• Department for Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2009). Belonging, being & becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Commonwealth of Australia.
• Department of Health and Social Care & Department for Education. (2017). Transforming children and young people’s mental health provision: A green paper. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/transforming-children-and-young-peoples-mental-health-provision-a-green-paper
• Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964.
• Domitrovich, C. E., Cortes, R. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Improving young children’s social and emotional competence: A randomized trial of the preschool “PATHS” curriculum. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 28(2), 67-91.
• Drummond, M. J. (2000). Susan Isaacs: Pioneering work in understanding children’s lives. In M. Hilton & P. Hirsch (Eds.), Practical visionaries: Women, education and social progress 1790-1930 (pp. 221-234). Longman.
• Dubiel, J. (2014). Effective assessment in the early years foundation stage. SAGE Publications.
• Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2011). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation. Praeger.
• Edwards, S. (2013). Digital play in the early years: A contextual response to the problem of integrating technologies and play-based pedagogies in the early childhood curriculum. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(2), 199-212.
• Epstein, A. S. (2014). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children’s learning. National Association for the Education of Young Children.
• Graham, P. (2008). Susan Isaacs: A life freeing the minds of children. Karnac Books.
• Hohmann, M., & Weikart, D. P. (2002). Educating young children: Active learning practices for preschool and child care programs. High/Scope Press.
• Humphrey, N., Lendrum, A., & Wigelsworth, M. (2010). Social and emotional aspects of learning (SEAL) programme in secondary schools: National evaluation. Department for Education.
• Isaacs, S. (1930). Intellectual growth in young children. Routledge.
• Isaacs, S. (1932). The children we teach: Seven to eleven years. University of London Press.
• Isaacs, S. (1933). Social development in young children. Routledge.
• Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (2000). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Kucirkova, N. (2017). Digital personalization in early childhood: Impact on childhood. Bloomsbury Academic.
• Lillard, A. S. (2013). Playful learning and Montessori education. American Journal of Play, 5(2), 157-186.
• Llenas, A. (2012). The colour monster. Templar Publishing.
• Ministry of Education. (2017). Te whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Ministry of Education.
• Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. Frederick A. Stokes Company.
• Nicholson, S. (1972). The theory of loose parts: An important principle for design methodology. Studies in Design Education Craft & Technology, 4(2), 5-14.
• O’Brien, L., & Murray, R. (2007). Forest School and its impacts on young children: Case studies in Britain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 249-265.
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
• Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. National Academy Press.
• Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Clarke, P. (2000). Supporting identity, diversity and language in the early years. Open University Press.
• Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms & communities. The Orion Society.
• Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2004). The effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project: Findings from pre-school to end of key stage 1. Department for Education and Skills.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Webster-Stratton, C. (2011). The incredible years: Parents, teachers, and children’s training series: Program content, methods, research and dissemination 1980–2011. Incredible Years.
• Whalley, M. (2017). Involving parents in their children’s learning: A knowledge-sharing approach. SAGE Publications.
• White, J. (2011). Outdoor provision in the early years. SAGE Publications.
• Whitebread, D. (2012). Developmental psychology and early childhood education. SAGE Publications.
• Whitebread, D., Neale, D., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Solis, S. L., Hopkins, E., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Zosh, J. M. (2017). The role of play in children’s development: A review of the evidence. LEGO Foundation.
• Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum. SAGE Publications.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Brooker, L. (2011). Taking children seriously: An alternative agenda for research? Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(2), 137-149. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1476718X10387897
• Grieshaber, S., & McArdle, F. (2010). The trouble with play. Open University Press. https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/en/publications/the-trouble-with-play
• Wood, E. (2014). Free choice and free play in early childhood education: Troubling the discourse. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(1), 4-18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09669760.2013.830562

Recommended Books

• Drummond, M. J. (2003). Assessing children’s learning. David Fulton Publishers.
  • This book explores assessment practices in early childhood education, drawing on Isaacs’s observational approach.
• Graham, P. (2009). Susan Isaacs: A life freeing the minds of children. Karnac Books. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-07158-000
  • A comprehensive biography of Susan Isaacs, providing insights into her life and work.
• Moyles, J. (2010). Thinking about play: Developing a reflective approach. Open University Press. https://www.mheducation.co.uk/thinking-about-play-developing-a-reflective-approach-9780335241088-emea-group
  • This book explores the importance of play in early childhood, building on Isaacs’s theories.
• Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://sk.sagepub.com/books/play-learning-and-the-early-childhood-curriculum
  • A comprehensive guide to play-based learning in early childhood education, incorporating Isaacs’s ideas.

Recommended Websites

• British Association for Early Childhood Education: https://www.early-education.org.uk/
  • Provides resources, research, and professional development opportunities for early years practitioners.
• Early Childhood Research Quarterly: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/early-childhood-research-quarterly
  • An academic journal featuring current research in early childhood education.
• National Children’s Bureau: https://www.ncb.org.uk/
  • Offers research, resources, and advocacy for children’s rights and wellbeing.
• The Froebel Trust: https://www.froebel.org.uk/
  • Provides information and resources on Froebelian principles, which share similarities with Isaacs’s approach.
• TACTYC: Association for Professional Development in Early Years: https://tactyc.org.uk/
  • Offers research, resources, and professional development opportunities for early years practitioners.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile

To cite this article use:

Early Years TV Susan Sutherland Isaacs on Play, Observation, and Emotional Development. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/susan-sutherland-isaacs-on-play-observation-and-emotional-development (Accessed: 13 December 2024).