Types of Parenting Styles: Differences and Impact on Children

Key Takeaways

• Four parenting styles: Authoritarian (high control, low warmth), Authoritative (high expectations with high warmth), Permissive (high warmth, low structure), and Uninvolved/Neglectful (low in both warmth and structure).
• Balanced Approach: Most parents blend elements from different styles and can benefit from adapting their approach to match their child’s unique temperament and developmental needs.
• Cultural Considerations: Effective parenting varies across cultures, with practices considered “strict” in Western contexts often viewed as appropriately protective in collectivist societies.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction

Parenting is a complex journey filled with countless decisions that shape not only day-to-day family life but also the long-term development of children. Among these decisions, your approach to parenting—often called your parenting style—stands as one of the most influential factors in your child’s growth and development.

Parenting styles represent the overall climate and approach parents use when raising their children. These patterns of behavior were first systematically studied by developmental psychologist Diana Baumrind in the 1960s, who identified distinct approaches that parents typically adopt (Baumrind, 1966). Later research expanded this framework to include a fourth style.

While these styles provide a helpful framework for understanding different approaches to child-rearing, it’s important to recognize that:

• Most parents don’t fit perfectly into just one category
• Many use a blend of techniques depending on the situation
• Parenting approaches often evolve as children grow and develop
• Cultural backgrounds and personal experiences significantly influence parenting

The significance of parenting styles extends far beyond just how parents interact with their children. Research consistently shows that these approaches can affect:

• A child’s emotional development and self-esteem
• Academic performance and motivation
• Social skills and relationship-building abilities
• Decision-making capabilities and risk assessment
• Long-term mental health outcomes

As you explore this topic, you might find yourself wondering: “Which parenting style is right for me and my child?” While research suggests certain approaches tend to yield more positive outcomes, understanding the full spectrum of parenting styles can help you make informed choices that align with your values and your child’s unique needs.

What Are Parenting Styles?

The concept of parenting styles has evolved through decades of psychological research and observation. In the 1960s, developmental psychologist Diana Baumrind conducted groundbreaking research by observing preschool children and their parents, identifying three distinct patterns of parental behavior and authority (Baumrind, 1966). Her pioneering work categorized these approaches as authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive. Later, researchers Maccoby and Martin (1983) expanded this framework by splitting the permissive category into two distinct styles—permissive and uninvolved—creating the four-style model widely accepted today.

At their core, parenting styles represent consistent patterns of behavior and attitudes that parents use when interacting with and raising their children. These styles are generally defined along two key dimensions:

• Responsiveness (warmth): How attentive, supportive, and sensitive parents are to their children’s needs
• Demandingness (control): How much parents expect and enforce rules, discipline, and mature behavior

Each parenting style represents a different combination of these dimensions, creating distinctive approaches to child-rearing that can significantly impact development.

It’s important to understand that parenting styles don’t exist in isolation—they’re deeply influenced by numerous factors:

• Cultural background: What is considered appropriate parenting varies widely across cultures. For instance, approaches considered authoritarian in Western contexts might be viewed as appropriately protective in other cultural settings (Kuppens & Ceulemans, 2019).
• Family history: Parents often either emulate or deliberately reject the parenting styles they experienced in their own childhood.
• Socioeconomic factors: Resources, stress levels, and living conditions can all shape how parents interact with their children.
• Education and knowledge: Awareness of child development research and access to parenting resources influence approaches.
• Temperament of both parent and child: A child’s unique personality and needs often shape parenting responses, creating a dynamic relationship where both parties influence each other.

Understanding these diverse influences helps explain why parenting styles can vary significantly not only between families but also within the same family—parents may use different approaches with different children or in different situations. This complexity reflects the multifaceted nature of the parent-child relationship, where approaches must constantly adapt to changing circumstances and developmental stages.

The Four Main Parenting Styles

Understanding the four primary parenting styles can help parents recognize their own tendencies and consider how their approach affects their children’s development. Each style represents a different combination of responsiveness (warmth) and demandingness (control), creating distinct parenting environments with varying outcomes for children. You can take the Parenting Style Quiz here.

Authoritarian Parenting

Authoritarian parenting is characterized by high demands and strict control paired with relatively low emotional responsiveness. This approach emphasizes obedience and discipline above nurturing and open communication.

Definition and Key Characteristics

Authoritarian parents typically:

• Establish rigid rules with little or no explanation
• Expect unquestioning obedience (“because I said so”)
• Use punishment rather than discipline to enforce compliance
• Provide minimal emotional support or warmth
• Allow little room for discussion or negotiation
• Focus primarily on control rather than teaching

Parents using this style often believe that strict discipline builds character and prepares children for a challenging world. They may view parenting primarily as an exercise in maintaining order and instilling respect for authority.

Effects on Children

Research consistently shows that authoritarian parenting can have significant impacts on children’s development:

• Children may display obedient behavior at home but rebellious behavior outside parental supervision (Masud et al., 2019)
• They often struggle with social skills and peer relationships
• Many develop lower self-esteem and self-confidence (Martínez & García, 2007)
• They may have difficulty making independent decisions
• Higher levels of aggression and defiance are commonly observed, particularly during adolescence
• Academic performance may be good due to pressure, but intrinsic motivation is typically lower

Recent studies have found that children raised with authoritarian parenting may be more vulnerable to emotional abuse in future relationships, as they’ve learned to accept controlling behavior as normal (Nijhof & Engels, 2007).

Pros

Despite concerns, authoritarian parenting does offer some advantages:

• Clear boundaries and expectations leave little room for confusion
• Structure and predictability can provide security
• High standards may promote discipline and achievement in some contexts
• Non-negotiable rules around safety issues (like wearing seatbelts or helmets) protect children

Cons

The drawbacks of authoritarian parenting are significant:

• Children may develop poor emotional regulation skills
• The focus on obedience can hinder critical thinking and independence
• Strict punishment may foster resentment and rebellion, especially in adolescence
• Children may struggle with social relationships and empathy
• The parent-child relationship often lacks closeness and trust
• Children may learn to use aggression or control in their own relationships

Signs You Might Be Using This Style

Ask yourself these questions to determine if you tend toward authoritarian parenting:

• Do you prioritize obedience over understanding?
• When your child asks why they need to follow a rule, do you often respond with “because I said so”?
• Do you rarely consider your child’s feelings or perspective when making decisions?
• Do you believe children should be seen and not heard?
• Do you use punishment rather than explanation to enforce rules?
• Is maintaining control more important to you than building a close relationship?

Authoritative Parenting

Authoritative parenting combines high expectations with high responsiveness, creating a balanced approach that many child development experts consider optimal for raising well-adjusted children.

Definition and Key Characteristics

Authoritative parents typically:

• Set clear rules and expectations but explain the reasoning behind them
• Enforce boundaries consistently while remaining flexible when appropriate
• Value open communication and listen to their children’s perspectives
• Use positive discipline techniques that teach rather than punish
• Encourage independence within reasonable limits
• Provide emotional support and nurturing while maintaining authority
• Focus on developing self-discipline rather than imposing control

This approach creates a family environment that balances structure with warmth, allowing children to develop within a supportive framework of reasonable limits.

The “Gold Standard”

Authoritative parenting is widely considered the most effective parenting style, backed by extensive research:

• The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends this balanced approach for optimal child development
• Multiple longitudinal studies show consistently positive outcomes across diverse populations
• Research indicates this style supports healthy development in emotional, social, and cognitive domains (Morris et al., 2007)

Effects on Children

Children raised by authoritative parents tend to demonstrate:

• Higher self-esteem and confidence
• Better emotional regulation and coping skills
• Stronger academic performance and motivation (Pong et al., 2010)
• More developed social skills and peer relationships
• Appropriate assertiveness and independence
• Lower rates of depression, anxiety, and behavior problems
• Better decision-making abilities and risk assessment

These children learn to understand and internalize rules rather than simply following them out of fear, developing stronger internal moral compasses that guide their behavior even when parents aren’t present.

Pros

The advantages of authoritative parenting include:

• Balanced development of both independence and respect for authority
• Children learn reasoning skills and understand the “why” behind rules
• Strong parent-child bonds built on mutual respect and communication
• Children develop healthy emotional regulation strategies
• The approach adapts well to different developmental stages
• Parents model healthy relationship dynamics that children can replicate

Cons

Though widely praised, authoritative parenting does present some challenges:

• Requires significant time, energy, and consistency from parents
• May be difficult to maintain during stressful periods or transitions
• Some communities or extended family members might view this approach as too lenient
• Cultural expectations may conflict with some aspects of authoritative parenting
• Parents need to continuously adapt their approach as children develop

Signs You Might Be Using This Style

Consider whether these statements resonate with your parenting approach:

• You explain the reasoning behind rules and expectations
• You consider your child’s feelings while still maintaining appropriate boundaries
• You value open, honest communication with your child
• You use logical consequences rather than punishment to teach lessons
• You recognize your child’s accomplishments and efforts
• You encourage independence while providing guidance and support
• You’re willing to negotiate on some issues while remaining firm on important matters

Permissive Parenting

Permissive parenting combines high warmth and responsiveness with low demands and minimal structure, creating an indulgent environment with few boundaries.

Definition and Key Characteristics

Permissive parents typically:

• Establish few rules or expectations for behavior
• Rarely enforce the limited rules they do set
• Avoid confrontation and discipline
• Act more as a friend than an authority figure
• Provide high levels of emotional support and affection
• Allow children significant freedom in decision-making
• Have difficulty saying “no” or setting limits

These parents often believe that natural consequences provide the best learning experiences and that strict rules might hamper creativity or self-expression.

Effects on Children

Research shows that permissive parenting can lead to mixed outcomes for children:

• Children often demonstrate high self-esteem but may struggle with self-regulation
• They frequently have difficulty respecting authority figures outside the home
• Academic performance may suffer due to lack of structure and discipline (Lopez et al., 2018)
• Behavioral problems are more common, particularly in structured environments
• Decision-making skills may be underdeveloped due to lack of guidance
• Higher rates of impulsive behavior are observed
• Risk of substance use increases, particularly in adolescence (Leeman et al., 2014)

Without clear boundaries, these children may struggle to develop the internal structure needed to navigate increasingly complex social environments as they grow.

Pros

Permissive parenting does offer some benefits:

• Strong, warm parent-child relationships with open communication
• Children often develop creativity and self-expression
• High levels of independence and comfort with making choices
• Children may feel more comfortable sharing problems with parents
• Lower levels of anxiety around performance or meeting expectations
• Greater spontaneity and flexibility in family dynamics

Cons

The drawbacks of permissive parenting can be significant:

• Children may struggle with self-discipline and impulse control
• Lack of boundaries can lead to entitled or demanding behavior
• Academic and behavioral problems are more common in structured settings
• Children may have difficulty understanding or respecting authority
• Poor understanding of limits can create safety concerns
• Lack of guidance may lead to poor decision-making, especially around risk

Signs You Might Be Using This Style

Consider these questions to determine if you tend toward permissive parenting:

• Do you avoid setting rules because you don’t want to upset your child?
• When you do set rules, do you often fail to enforce them consistently?
• Do you find yourself giving in to your child’s demands to avoid conflict?
• Is being liked by your child more important to you than providing guidance?
• Do you allow your child to make most of their own decisions, even when they may not be ready?
• Do you rarely set consequences for inappropriate behavior?

Uninvolved/Neglectful Parenting

Uninvolved parenting represents low levels of both responsiveness and demandingness, creating a detached parenting style where children receive minimal guidance, nurturing, or attention.

Definition and Key Characteristics

Uninvolved parents typically:

• Provide basic necessities but limited emotional support
• Set few rules or expectations for behavior
• Demonstrate minimal involvement in their child’s activities and interests
• Communicate infrequently with their children
• Know little about their child’s whereabouts, friends, or school life
• Offer limited guidance or structure
• Focus more on their own needs and concerns than their child’s

It’s important to distinguish between chronic uninvolved parenting and temporary periods of reduced involvement due to circumstances like illness, job loss, or other significant stressors. Many parents experiencing difficult life transitions may temporarily exhibit some characteristics of uninvolved parenting without it being their predominant style.

Situational Factors vs. Intentional Neglect

Uninvolved parenting may stem from various circumstances:

• Mental health issues like depression or substance abuse
• Overwhelming stress or financial hardship
• Lack of understanding about child development
• Personal history of being parented in a neglectful manner
• Extreme work demands or multiple jobs
• Single parenting without adequate support systems

While these factors may explain uninvolved parenting, they don’t negate the impact on children, who still need appropriate care and attention for healthy development.

Effects on Children

Research consistently shows that uninvolved parenting produces the most negative outcomes of all parenting styles:

• Children often develop poor emotional regulation skills
• Academic performance typically suffers significantly
• Behavioral problems are common both at home and school
• Social skills development may be delayed or impaired
• Higher risk of substance abuse and delinquent behavior (Kuppens & Ceulemans, 2019)
• Difficulty forming healthy attachments in relationships
• Lower self-esteem and sense of self-worth

Some children from uninvolved homes develop remarkable resilience and self-sufficiency out of necessity. However, this adaptation comes at a significant emotional cost and doesn’t negate the challenges these children face.

Long-term Consequences

The effects of uninvolved parenting often persist into adulthood:

• Difficulty forming and maintaining close relationships
• Higher rates of anxiety and depression
• Increased risk of substance abuse issues
• Challenges with emotional regulation and impulse control
• Potential for repeating uninvolved parenting patterns with their own children
• Academic and career difficulties stemming from early educational struggles
• Higher rates of criminal behavior and incarceration

Early intervention and support can mitigate these outcomes, highlighting the importance of recognizing and addressing uninvolved parenting patterns before they create lasting harm.

Signs of Uninvolved Parenting

Consider whether any of these patterns might be present in your parenting approach:

• You rarely know where your child is or what they’re doing
• You have minimal knowledge about your child’s friends, teachers, or daily activities
• You seldom attend school events or parent-teacher conferences
• You spend very little one-on-one time with your child
• You rarely ask about your child’s feelings, interests, or concerns
• You find it difficult to name your child’s current challenges or successes
• Your interactions with your child are limited and primarily practical rather than emotional

Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward making positive changes that can significantly improve your child’s developmental outcomes.

Modern Sub-Types of Parenting Styles

Beyond the four classic parenting styles, contemporary discourse has introduced numerous sub-types that describe more specific approaches to child-rearing. These modern parenting styles often represent variations or combinations of the traditional models, adapted to address specific concerns or philosophies in today’s parenting landscape.

Helicopter Parenting

Helicopter parenting describes a style where parents “hover” excessively over their children, micromanaging their activities, experiences, and problems. This approach emerged prominently in the early 2000s and has been the subject of considerable research and media attention.

Helicopter parents typically:

• Intervene quickly to solve problems children could handle themselves
• Monitor and direct their children’s activities, friendships, and academic work closely
• Communicate frequently with teachers, coaches, and other adults in their child’s life
• Make decisions for their children well into adolescence and even adulthood
• Experience high anxiety about their child’s success and safety

Research by the American Psychological Association suggests that helicopter parenting, while well-intentioned, can undermine children’s development of autonomy, confidence, and coping skills (Schiffrin et al., 2014). Children of helicopter parents often struggle with independent decision-making and may experience higher levels of anxiety and depression as they mature, particularly when facing challenges without parental intervention.

Free-Range Parenting

Representing a deliberate counterpoint to helicopter parenting, free-range parenting emerged as a movement advocating for children’s independence and unsupervised exploration. Popularized by Lenore Skenazy after she allowed her 9-year-old son to navigate New York City alone, this approach emphasizes building self-reliance through measured risk-taking.

Free-range parents typically:

• Allow children age-appropriate freedom to explore without constant supervision
• Encourage independent problem-solving and risk assessment
• Trust children to make decisions and learn from natural consequences
• Consciously resist overprotection and fear-based parenting

This style has sparked legal debates about neglect versus independence, leading some states to pass “reasonable childhood independence” laws that protect parents who allow their children certain unsupervised activities. Proponents argue that free-range parenting builds resilience and competence, while critics worry about safety concerns in modern environments.

Gentle Parenting

Gentle parenting has gained significant popularity in recent years as an approach that emphasizes empathy, respect, and understanding in parent-child relationships. While not officially recognized in academic research as a distinct style, it generally combines elements of authoritative parenting with attachment theory principles.

Gentle parents typically:

• Focus on understanding the feelings behind children’s behavior
• Use natural consequences and discussion rather than punishment
• Prioritize connection and communication over strict discipline
• Practice respectful parenting that treats children as full individuals
• Emphasize emotional intelligence and regulation

This approach has been popularized through social media and parenting blogs, with proponents suggesting it fosters stronger parent-child bonds and emotional intelligence. Critics sometimes argue that gentle parenting may lack sufficient structure or boundaries for optimal child development.

Tiger Parenting

Tiger parenting gained widespread attention following the publication of Amy Chua’s 2011 book “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother.” This highly directive approach, often associated with certain Asian cultural traditions, emphasizes academic excellence, skill mastery, and achievement through strict discipline and high expectations.

Tiger parents typically:

• Set extremely high standards for academic performance and achievement
• Prioritize practice, persistence, and hard work over leisure
• Closely manage children’s time, activities, and educational pursuits
• Emphasize respect for authority and family honor
• Use direct criticism alongside praise to motivate improvement

Research on tiger parenting presents mixed findings. While some studies show associations with academic achievement, others indicate increased psychological distress among children raised with this approach (Kim et al., 2013). Current understanding suggests that cultural context significantly mediates the effects of tiger parenting, with outcomes varying based on community values and expectations.

Snowplow/Lawnmower Parenting

Snowplow parenting (also called lawnmower or bulldozer parenting) describes parents who actively remove obstacles from their children’s paths to ensure smooth, challenge-free experiences. This approach gained attention following the 2019 college admissions scandal, which exemplified extreme parental intervention to secure advantages for children.

Snowplow parents typically:

• Intervene to resolve conflicts with peers, teachers, or coaches
• Complete tasks or assignments their children find difficult
• Advocate aggressively for special treatment or opportunities
• Shield children from experiencing failure or disappointment
• Make extensive efforts to ensure their child’s success

This style tends to limit children’s development of problem-solving skills, resilience, and independence. Research suggests that children of snowplow parents often develop heightened anxiety about failure and reduced confidence in their abilities to overcome challenges independently (Segrin et al., 2015).

Lighthouse Parenting

Coined by pediatrician Kenneth Ginsburg in his book “Raising Kids to Thrive,” lighthouse parenting offers a balanced alternative to both overprotective and hands-off approaches. This metaphorical style suggests parents should function like lighthouses—providing consistent guidance while allowing children to navigate their own journeys.

Lighthouse parents typically:

• Offer stability and clear direction without controlling their children’s experiences
• Allow appropriate independence while remaining watchful from a distance
• Provide guidance during significant challenges but don’t intervene unnecessarily
• Balance protection with the freedom to make mistakes and learn
• Communicate clear values while respecting their child’s growing autonomy

This approach aligns closely with authoritative parenting but offers a compelling metaphor that many contemporary parents find accessible and practical for everyday application.

Attachment Parenting

Developed by pediatrician William Sears in the 1980s, attachment parenting emphasizes forming strong emotional bonds between parent and child through practices that promote physical closeness and responsiveness. Based on attachment theory, this approach suggests secure early attachments create foundations for lifelong emotional health.

Attachment parents typically practice:

• Extended breastfeeding and baby-led weaning
• Co-sleeping or bed-sharing (following safe sleep guidelines)
• Babywearing using slings or carriers
• Prompt response to crying and other signals
• Gentle discipline without physical punishment

Research on attachment parenting shows mixed results. While responsive parenting generally promotes secure attachment, some specific practices advocated by this approach lack strong evidence for developmental benefits (Beijers et al., 2016). Critics note that rigid adherence to all attachment parenting practices can create unnecessary pressure on parents, particularly mothers.

Other Animal-Themed Parenting Styles

Following the popularity of “tiger parenting,” various animal metaphors have emerged to describe different parenting approaches:

Dolphin Parenting: Described by psychiatrist Shimi Kang, this approach emphasizes balance, playfulness, and social intelligence. Dolphin parents provide guidance while encouraging independence and collaboration, balancing rules with flexibility—much like authoritative parenting.

Jellyfish Parenting: Representing extreme permissiveness, jellyfish parents provide minimal structure or discipline, allowing children to “float” with few boundaries or expectations. This approach generally aligns with permissive parenting and often results in similar developmental challenges.

Elephant Parenting: Inspired by elephant herds’ nurturing community structures, this style emphasizes emotional connection, protection, and extended family involvement. Elephant parents prioritize emotional security and relationships over achievement or strict discipline.

Panda Parenting: A relaxed approach that allows significant freedom while maintaining gentle guidance. Panda parents encourage independence and creativity while providing a stable, supportive environment—sometimes described as a more laid-back version of authoritative parenting.

While these animal metaphors lack scientific validation as distinct parenting styles, they offer accessible frameworks that help parents conceptualize different approaches to raising children. Most represent variations of the four established parenting styles rather than truly novel approaches to child-rearing.

How to Determine Your Parenting Style

Understanding your own parenting style is a valuable step toward intentional parenting. Most parents don’t fit perfectly into a single category but instead display a blend of characteristics that may shift based on circumstances, the child’s age, or even their own stress levels. Gaining insight into your predominant tendencies can help you leverage your strengths and identify areas where adjustments might benefit your child’s development.

Self-Assessment Questions

To begin identifying your primary parenting style, consider how you typically respond in various parenting scenarios. Reflect honestly on the following questions:

• On Rules and Expectations:
  • Do you set clear rules and expectations for your child?
  • How do you communicate these expectations?
  • What happens when rules are broken?
  • Do you explain the reasoning behind your rules?
• On Communication and Emotional Support:
  • How do you respond when your child is upset?
  • Do you regularly discuss feelings and emotions with your child?
  • How comfortable is your child sharing problems with you?
  • Do you prioritize your child’s perspective in discussions?
• On Independence and Decision-Making:
  • How much input does your child have in family decisions?
  • Do you encourage your child to solve problems independently?
  • How often do you step in to complete tasks your child finds challenging?
  • At what age do you believe children should make their own decisions?
• On Discipline and Consequences:
  • What is your primary goal when disciplining your child?
  • Do you use punishment or natural consequences?
  • How consistently do you enforce boundaries?
  • How do you balance nurturing with discipline?

Your answers to these questions may reveal patterns that align with particular parenting styles. For example, if you rarely explain rules, expect immediate obedience, and use punishment to enforce compliance, you likely lean toward authoritarian parenting. Conversely, if you set clear expectations but explain them thoroughly, listen to your child’s perspective, and use logical consequences, your approach is more aligned with authoritative parenting.

Research by Baumrind (1991) suggests that honest self-assessment can be challenging, as parents often perceive their behavior differently than their children do. Asking trusted family members or friends for feedback can provide additional perspective on your parenting approach.

Reflection on Your Own Upbringing

Our parenting styles are often influenced—either directly or reactively—by how we were parented. According to research by Belsky and colleagues (2009), parents frequently either replicate the parenting they experienced or deliberately adopt opposite approaches based on their evaluation of their own childhood experiences.

Consider these reflection points about your upbringing:

• What aspects of your parents’ approach do you consciously try to replicate?
• Which elements of your childhood experience do you actively avoid repeating?
• How did your parents’ style affect your emotional development and self-image?
• What unspoken messages about parenting did you internalize growing up?
• How might your reaction to your own upbringing be influencing your current parenting decisions?

This reflection can reveal unconscious patterns and help explain why certain parenting situations trigger strong emotional responses. Understanding these influences allows for more conscious choices rather than automatic reactions based on childhood experiences.

Many parents discover they’re reproducing patterns they promised themselves they would avoid, particularly during stressful moments. Awareness of these tendencies is the first step toward intentional change if desired.

Considering Your Child’s Unique Temperament and Needs

Effective parenting isn’t one-size-fits-all—even within the same family. Research in developmental psychology consistently shows that children’s innate temperaments interact significantly with parenting styles, creating what Thomas and Chess (1977) called “goodness of fit” between parent approach and child characteristics.

When evaluating your parenting style, consider:

• Your child’s temperament:
  • How does your child typically respond to new situations?
  • Is your child naturally cautious or bold?
  • How sensitive is your child to sensory input or emotional stimuli?
  • How adaptable is your child to changes in routine?
• Your child’s developmental needs:
  • What stage of development is your child currently experiencing?
  • Are there specific challenges your child is facing (learning differences, social challenges)?
  • How does your child best receive guidance and support?
  • What motivates your child most effectively?
• The parent-child match:
  • Which aspects of your parenting approach seem to work well with this particular child?
  • Where do you and your child tend to clash or misunderstand each other?
  • How might you need to adjust your natural tendencies to better meet this child’s needs?

Research by Kiff et al. (2011) indicates that children with different temperaments respond differently to the same parenting approaches. For example, highly sensitive children may be more affected by both positive and negative parenting behaviors than less sensitive peers. Similarly, a child with a strong-willed temperament may require different discipline strategies than a naturally compliant sibling.

Understanding your child’s unique makeup allows you to adapt your approach appropriately, potentially using different elements of various parenting styles based on what best serves your child’s development. This flexible, child-centered approach—adjusting your style to fit your child rather than expecting your child to adjust to your preferred style—often yields the most positive outcomes.

By thoughtfully assessing your own tendencies, reflecting on their origins, and considering your child’s individual needs, you can develop a more intentional and effective approach to parenting that builds on your strengths while addressing potential blind spots.

How to Become a More Authoritative Parent

Given the substantial research supporting authoritative parenting as an effective approach for raising well-adjusted, confident children, many parents seek to adopt more authoritative practices. Transitioning toward this balanced style—regardless of your starting point—is possible with conscious effort and consistent practice. The following strategies can help you develop a more authoritative approach to parenting.

Practical Steps Toward Balanced Parenting

Moving toward authoritative parenting involves finding the sweet spot between structure and warmth. According to Baumrind’s research (1991), this balance creates an environment where children thrive emotionally, socially, and academically. Here are practical steps to help shift your parenting approach:

• Start with self-awareness:
  • Pay attention to your automatic responses in challenging parenting moments
  • Notice when you tend to become either overly strict or overly permissive
  • Identify your emotional triggers that lead to less balanced parenting
  • Practice pausing before responding to give yourself time to choose your reaction
• Focus on relationship-building:
  • Dedicate regular one-on-one time with each child
  • Show genuine interest in your child’s thoughts, feelings, and experiences
  • Demonstrate empathy even when you disagree with your child’s perspective
  • Create family rituals that foster connection and belonging
• Develop consistency:
  • Apply rules and expectations consistently across situations
  • Ensure all caregivers understand and generally support the same boundaries
  • Follow through on both consequences and promises
  • Maintain predictable routines while allowing appropriate flexibility

Research by Darling and Steinberg (1993) suggests that consistency significantly impacts how children interpret and respond to parenting approaches. When rules and responses are predictable, children develop greater security and clearer understanding of expectations.

Setting Clear Boundaries While Remaining Responsive

A hallmark of authoritative parenting is the ability to maintain firm boundaries while remaining emotionally responsive to children’s needs. This combination helps children feel both secure and valued.

• Establishing effective boundaries:
  • Identify your non-negotiable rules based on safety, values, and developmental appropriateness
  • Explain the reasoning behind limits in age-appropriate language
  • Involve children in setting some family rules when possible
  • Focus on essential boundaries rather than creating rules for everything
  • Revisit and adjust boundaries as children develop and demonstrate responsibility
• Balancing boundaries with responsiveness:
  • Listen to your child’s perspective even when enforcing limits
  • Acknowledge feelings while maintaining necessary boundaries (“I understand you’re disappointed, but bedtime remains at 8:00”)
  • Look for appropriate compromises when possible
  • Offer choices within boundaries to provide autonomy

Studies by Grolnick (2009) demonstrate that children who understand the reasoning behind rules are more likely to internalise values and develop self-regulation than those who are simply told to obey without explanation.

Communication Strategies

Effective communication forms the foundation of authoritative parenting. How you talk with your child shapes not only your relationship but also their developing communication skills.

• Active listening techniques:
  • Give your full attention when your child speaks
  • Make eye contact and use encouraging body language
  • Reflect back what you hear to confirm understanding
  • Ask clarifying questions rather than making assumptions
  • Validate emotions even when you can’t accommodate requests
• Expressing expectations clearly:
  • Use specific, concrete language about behaviour expectations
  • Frame instructions positively when possible (“Walk inside” rather than “Don’t run”)
  • Check for understanding by asking your child to explain rules in their own words
  • Discuss expectations before entering new situations
• Handling difficult conversations:
  • Choose appropriate timing for important discussions
  • Use “I” statements to express concerns without blame
  • Focus on behaviour rather than character (“That action was disrespectful” rather than “You are disrespectful”)
  • Model calm communication even during disagreements

Research by Gottman et al. (1997) on “emotion coaching” shows that parents who acknowledge emotions, offer guidance on emotional regulation, and maintain limits raise children with stronger emotional intelligence and fewer behaviour problems.

Positive Discipline Techniques

Authoritative discipline focuses on teaching rather than punishing, helping children learn from mistakes while maintaining their dignity and self-worth.

• Preventive strategies:
  • Set children up for success with clear expectations and routines
  • Notice and acknowledge positive behaviour frequently
  • Redirect inappropriate behaviour before it escalates
  • Teach skills proactively rather than waiting for problems to occur
• Responding to misbehaviour:
  • Use natural and logical consequences that relate to the behaviour
  • Focus on problem-solving rather than punishment
  • Involve children in developing solutions when appropriate
  • Help children understand the impact of their actions on others
  • Use “time-in” (processing together) rather than isolated “time-out” when possible
• Teaching responsibility and self-discipline:
  • Gradually increase responsibilities and privileges as children demonstrate readiness
  • Allow children to experience the natural consequences of minor mistakes
  • Encourage reflection on behaviour and decision-making
  • Model taking responsibility for your own mistakes and making amends

Studies by Gershoff et al. (2018) demonstrate that positive discipline techniques not only reduce problem behaviours more effectively than punitive approaches but also support better long-term outcomes in terms of mental health, social skills, and academic achievement.

Transitioning to a more authoritative style takes time and practice. Parents who were raised with either very strict or very permissive parenting may find it particularly challenging to find this middle ground. Be patient with yourself during this process, recognizing that consistency of effort matters more than perfection. Even small shifts toward more authoritative practices can significantly benefit your child’s development and your relationship.

Remember that authoritative parenting looks different at various developmental stages. What works for a toddler will need adjustment for a teenager, though the underlying principles of balancing structure with warmth remain consistent throughout childhood and adolescence.

Cultural Considerations in Parenting Styles

While the four classic parenting styles provide a useful framework, it’s essential to recognise that they emerged from research primarily conducted in Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) societies. Cultural context significantly influences what constitutes “optimal” parenting across different communities and countries.

How Parenting Styles Vary Across Cultures

Parenting practices reflect cultural values, historical contexts, and community priorities. Research in cross-cultural psychology reveals significant variations in how different societies approach child-rearing:

• Collectivist vs. Individualist Orientations:
  • Collectivist cultures (prevalent in East Asia, Africa, South America) often emphasise interdependence, family harmony, and respect for elders
  • Individualist cultures (common in North America, Western Europe) typically prioritise independence, self-expression, and personal achievement
  • These fundamental value orientations shape expectations for children’s behaviour and development (Triandis, 1995)
• Cultural Interpretations of Parental Control:
  • Practices considered “authoritarian” in Western contexts may be viewed as protective or caring in other cultures
  • Research by Chao (1994) found that Chinese parents’ strict control was often motivated by “training” (guan) – a concept encompassing both love and governance
  • Korean and Chinese-American parents may emphasise academic achievement more strongly than European-American parents, reflecting cultural values rather than simply “strict” parenting
• Expressions of Warmth and Affection:
  • Cultures display emotional warmth differently – some through physical affection, others through provision of resources or protection
  • German parents often value fostering independence from an early age
  • Japanese mothers typically emphasise physical closeness and emotional bonding (amae)
  • Puerto Rican families often demonstrate affection through physical proximity and protecting children from distress
• Discipline Approaches:
  • Physical discipline is viewed differently across cultures, though research increasingly shows negative outcomes regardless of cultural context (Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor, 2016)
  • Some communities use community-based discipline where extended family members share responsibility
  • Shame-based discipline is more common in some East Asian cultures, while Western approaches increasingly focus on positive reinforcement

Research by Bornstein et al. (2017) demonstrates that cultural models of parenting are deeply embedded in belief systems about child development, family obligations, and societal expectations. These cultural frameworks influence what parents view as appropriate goals and methods for raising children.

Adapting Parenting Approaches to Cultural Values

In increasingly multicultural societies, many families navigate multiple cultural influences on their parenting approaches. This complexity requires thoughtful adaptation rather than uncritical adoption of any single model:

• Integrating Cultural Strengths:
  • Identify values from your cultural heritage that support positive child development
  • Consider which aspects of your cultural parenting traditions you wish to preserve
  • Recognise which practices may need adaptation in your current context
  • Blend approaches that honour heritage while supporting children’s functioning in their present environment
• Considering Acculturation Processes:
  • Immigrant families often experience “acculturation gaps” where children adapt to the dominant culture more quickly than parents
  • Research by Baumrind (2012) suggests that maintaining cultural connections while adapting to new contexts supports children’s well-being
  • Finding balance between heritage values and current context helps children develop strong identities and navigate diverse settings
• Evaluating Research Through Cultural Lenses:
  • Consider whether parenting research reflects your cultural context
  • Question universal claims about “best” practices without cultural qualification
  • Look for research that includes diverse populations and cultural perspectives
  • Recognise that outcomes valued in one culture (e.g., independence) may differ from those prioritised in another (e.g., family interdependence)
• Practical Navigation of Multiple Cultural Influences:
  • Communicate openly with children about cultural values and expectations
  • Help children understand differing expectations between home, school, and community
  • Connect with others from similar cultural backgrounds to share experiences and strategies
  • Consider how blending elements from different parenting approaches might best serve your unique family situation

According to research by Super and Harkness (2002), successful adaptation occurs when parents create a “developmental niche” that thoughtfully integrates cultural values, practical circumstances, and children’s individual characteristics. This approach acknowledges that effective parenting isn’t about rigidly applying any universal style but rather about creating coherent, responsive environments that support children’s development within their specific cultural context.

Understanding cultural influences on parenting helps reduce judgment of different approaches and supports more thoughtful, intentional parenting decisions that honour both heritage and contemporary context.

Parenting Styles Within the Same Family

Many households feature parents with different natural approaches to child-rearing. These differences may stem from diverse upbringings, personality differences, or varying beliefs about child development. While some variation can provide children with balanced exposure to different strengths, significant discrepancies can create confusion and family tension.

When Partners Have Different Parenting Styles

Parenting style differences often become apparent during key moments of child-rearing:

• Common pattern variations include:
  • One parent authoritative, one more permissive
  • Different approaches to discipline and consequences
  • Varying comfort levels with emotional expression
  • Divergent views on appropriate independence and risk-taking
  • Different expectations regarding rules and compliance

Research by Lindsey and Mize (2001) suggests that children are remarkably perceptive about these differences and may adapt their behaviour accordingly—often approaching one parent for permission when they anticipate the other might refuse. While this shows adaptability, it can undermine parental authority and create inconsistent expectations.

How to Find Common Ground

Developing a more unified approach benefits both parents and children:

• Strategies for alignment include:
  • Schedule regular parenting discussions away from children and heightened emotions
  • Identify shared values and long-term goals for your children
  • Acknowledge each partner’s parenting strengths and expertise
  • Establish core family rules that both parents commit to upholding
  • Create a process for handling disagreements before they arise
  • Consider parenting education courses or books to explore together
  • Focus on compromise rather than “winning” parenting disagreements

When working toward alignment, Cowan and Cowan (2002) emphasise the importance of mutual respect and recognition that different approaches may work in different situations. The goal isn’t identical parenting but complementary approaches that provide consistent messages about important values and expectations.

Effects of Mixed Parenting Styles on Children

How children respond to different parenting styles within the family depends largely on the degree of difference and how parents manage these variations:

• Potential impacts include:
  • Confusion about expectations and boundaries
  • Increased parent-child conflict when rules are inconsistently enforced
  • Strategic behaviour to exploit parenting differences
  • Triangulation, where children are caught between parental disagreements
  • Modelling of poor conflict resolution if parents openly undermine each other
  • Potential benefits from exposure to different strengths and perspectives when differences are managed constructively

Research by McHale et al. (2002) indicates that the most negative outcomes occur not when parents have different styles but when they actively contradict or undermine each other. Children benefit most when parents present as a unified team with complementary approaches, communicate respectfully about differences, and support each other’s parenting decisions even when they might have approached the situation differently.

Finding balance between maintaining individual parenting strengths and providing consistent guidance requires ongoing communication and mutual support—an investment that significantly benefits children’s sense of security and understanding of family expectations.

Conclusion

Parenting is perhaps the most consequential role many of us will undertake—a journey filled with joy, challenges, and continuous growth for both parent and child. Throughout this exploration of parenting styles, we’ve examined various approaches and their potential impacts on children’s development.

As you reflect on your own parenting approach, remember these essential points:

• Perfection is neither possible nor necessary in parenting. Research by Siegel and Bryson (2020) highlights that children benefit most not from perfect parenting but from relationships where repair and reconnection follow inevitable ruptures. The willingness to acknowledge mistakes, make amends, and try again teaches children resilience and authentic relationship skills.
• Authoritative elements benefit most children across diverse contexts. While cultural variations matter significantly, the core components of authoritative parenting—providing both structure and warmth, setting clear expectations while remaining responsive to children’s needs—support positive outcomes in emotional well-being, social competence, and academic achievement (Pinquart, 2016).
• Self-awareness and flexibility represent crucial parenting skills. Understanding your default tendencies, recognising how your own upbringing influences your parenting, and adapting your approach to suit your child’s unique temperament and developmental stage allow for more effective parenting. As Belsky (1984) noted decades ago, effective parenting isn’t about rigidly applying a single approach but about responsive adaptation to the evolving needs of your child and family circumstances.

Ultimately, the goal isn’t to achieve a perfect parenting style but to create a nurturing, consistent relationship that helps your child develop into a confident, capable, and compassionate individual. By combining clear boundaries with emotional support, respecting your child as an individual while providing appropriate guidance, and remaining open to growth in your parenting approach, you create the conditions where both you and your child can thrive.

Remember that parenting styles exist on a spectrum rather than in rigid categories. Most parents blend elements from different approaches and adapt their style as children develop and circumstances change. This flexibility, paired with consistent core values and genuine connection, forms the foundation of effective parenting across diverse families and cultures.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the 4 Parenting Styles?

The four main parenting styles are authoritarian, authoritative, permissive, and uninvolved/neglectful. These styles were identified by psychologist Diana Baumrind in the 1960s (with the fourth added later) and are characterized by different combinations of responsiveness (warmth) and demandingness (control). Authoritarian parenting is high in control but low in warmth; authoritative combines high expectations with high warmth; permissive is high in warmth but low in structure; and uninvolved is low in both warmth and structure. Research consistently shows that the authoritative style generally produces the most positive developmental outcomes for children.

Which Parenting Style Is Most Effective?

Research consistently indicates that authoritative parenting is the most effective style for raising well-adjusted children. This approach combines high expectations and clear boundaries with high emotional responsiveness and warmth. Authoritative parents explain the reasoning behind rules, listen to their children’s perspectives, and use positive discipline techniques that teach rather than punish. Studies show children raised with authoritative parenting tend to develop better emotional regulation, social skills, academic performance, and self-esteem. While cultural context matters, the fundamental elements of authoritative parenting—structure with warmth—benefit children across diverse backgrounds.

What Is My Parenting Style?

To identify your parenting style, consider how you typically handle rules, communication, and discipline. Authoritarian parents enforce strict rules without explanation and prioritize obedience. Authoritative parents set clear boundaries but explain reasons and consider children’s feelings. Permissive parents establish few rules and rarely enforce consequences. Uninvolved parents provide minimal guidance or emotional support. Most parents blend aspects of different styles. Reflect on how you respond to misbehaviour, whether you explain rules or just enforce them, how much independence you allow, and how you show emotional support to determine your predominant style.

How Do Parenting Styles Affect Child Development?

Parenting styles significantly impact child development across multiple domains. Authoritarian parenting often produces obedient children who may struggle with self-esteem and social skills. Authoritative parenting tends to foster confident, socially competent children with better emotional regulation and academic performance. Permissive parenting frequently results in children with poor self-discipline but creative thinking. Uninvolved parenting typically leads to the most negative outcomes, including behavioural problems and emotional difficulties. Research by Pinquart (2016) demonstrates that these effects persist into adolescence and adulthood, influencing relationship patterns, academic achievement, and mental health outcomes.

Can Parents Have Different Parenting Styles?

Yes, it’s common for parents to have different natural parenting styles, which may stem from their own upbringings, personalities, or beliefs about children. While some complementary differences can provide children with balanced exposure to different strengths, significant discrepancies can create confusion and family tension. Research shows that children benefit most when parents work toward alignment on core values and rules while respecting each other’s approaches. Open communication between parents about parenting philosophies, consistent enforcement of key family rules, and supporting each other’s authority helps create a stable environment for children.

What Is Tiger Parenting?

Tiger parenting is a strict parenting approach characterized by high demands for achievement, particularly in academics and skill mastery, combined with intensive involvement in children’s activities and choices. Popularized by Amy Chua’s 2011 book “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother,” this style is often associated with certain East Asian cultural traditions. Tiger parents typically set extremely high standards, closely manage children’s time, prioritize practice over play, and may use criticism alongside praise as motivation. Research shows mixed outcomes, with potential academic benefits but also increased risk of psychological distress, depending on cultural context and how the approach is implemented.

How Do I Become a More Authoritative Parent?

To become a more authoritative parent, focus on balancing structure with warmth. Set clear, consistent boundaries while explaining the reasoning behind rules. Listen to your child’s perspective even when enforcing limits. Use positive discipline techniques that teach rather than punish. Acknowledge emotions while maintaining necessary boundaries. Offer choices within limits to provide autonomy. Practice active listening and express expectations clearly. Gradually increase responsibilities as children demonstrate readiness. Be patient with yourself during this transition, as shifting parenting styles takes time and practice, especially if you were raised with a different approach.

What Is Helicopter Parenting?

Helicopter parenting describes a style where parents excessively “hover” over their children, micromanaging their activities, experiences, and problems. These parents intervene quickly to solve challenges children could handle themselves, monitor activities closely, and make decisions for children well into adolescence. While well-intentioned and motivated by concern for children’s wellbeing and success, research by the American Psychological Association suggests this approach undermines the development of autonomy, confidence, and coping skills. Children of helicopter parents often struggle with independent decision-making and may experience higher levels of anxiety and depression, particularly when facing challenges without parental intervention.

Do Parenting Styles Vary Across Cultures?

Yes, parenting styles vary significantly across cultures, reflecting different values, historical contexts, and community priorities. Practices considered “authoritarian” in Western contexts may be viewed as protective in collectivist cultures. Expressions of emotional warmth also differ—some cultures emphasize physical affection while others demonstrate care through provision of resources or protection. Research by Bornstein (2017) shows that parenting is deeply embedded in cultural belief systems about child development and family obligations. While certain elements of authoritative parenting appear beneficial across cultures, effective parenting ultimately involves thoughtfully adapting approaches to honor both cultural heritage and children’s individual needs.

References

• Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887-907.
• Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
• Baumrind, D. (2012). Differentiating between confrontive and coercive kinds of parental power-assertive disciplinary practices. Human Development, 55(2), 35-51.
• Beijers, R., Riksen-Walraven, J. M., & de Weerth, C. (2016). Attachment and infant night waking: A longitudinal study from birth through the first year of life. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 37(9), 724-734.
• Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development, 55(1), 83-96.
• Belsky, J., Conger, R., & Capaldi, D. M. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of parenting: Introduction to the special section. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1201-1204.
• Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., & Lansford, J. E. (2017). Parenting attributions and attitudes in cross-cultural perspective. Parenting: Science and Practice, 17(4), 270-278.
• Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111-1119.
• Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2002). Interventions as tests of family systems theories: Marital and family relationships in children’s development and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 14(4), 731-759.
• Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496.
• Gershoff, E. T., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 453-469.
• Gershoff, E. T., Sattler, K. M. P., & Ansari, A. (2018). Strengthening causal estimates for links between spanking and children’s externalizing behavior problems. Psychological Science, 29(1), 110-120.
• Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Psychology Press.
• Grolnick, W. S. (2009). The role of parents in facilitating autonomous self-regulation for education. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 164-173.
• Kiff, C. J., Lengua, L. J., & Zalewski, M. (2011). Nature and nurturing: Parenting in the context of child temperament. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14(3), 251-301.
• Kim, S. Y., Wang, Y., Orozco-Lapray, D., Shen, Y., & Murtuza, M. (2013). Does “tiger parenting” exist? Parenting profiles of Chinese Americans and adolescent developmental outcomes. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 7-18.
• Kuppens, S., & Ceulemans, E. (2019). Parenting styles: A closer look at a well-known concept. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(1), 168-181.
• Leeman, R. F., Patock-Peckham, J. A., Hoff, R. A., Krishnan-Sarin, S., Steinberg, M. A., Rugle, L. J., & Potenza, M. N. (2014). Perceived parental permissiveness toward gambling and risky behaviors in adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(2), 115-123.
• Lindsey, E. W., & Mize, J. (2001). Contextual differences in parent-child play: Implications for children’s gender role development. Sex Roles, 44(3-4), 155-176.
• Lopez, N. V., Schembre, S., Belcher, B. R., O’Connor, S., Maher, J. P., Arbel, R., Margolin, G., & Dunton, G. F. (2018). Parenting styles, food-related parenting practices, and children’s healthy eating: A mediation analysis to examine relationships between parenting and child diet. Appetite, 128, 205-213.
• Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (4th ed.). Wiley.
• Martínez, I., & García, J. F. (2007). Impact of parenting styles on adolescents’ self-esteem and internalization of values in Spain. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 338-348.
• Masud, H., Ahmad, M. S., Cho, K. W., & Fakhr, Z. (2019). Parenting styles and aggression among young adolescents: A systematic review of literature. Community Mental Health Journal, 55(6), 1015-1030.
• McHale, J. P., Khazan, I., Erera, P., Rotman, T., DeCourcey, W., & McConnell, M. (2002). Coparenting in diverse family systems. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (pp. 75-107). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Morris, A. S., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Myers, S. S., & Robinson, L. R. (2007). The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development, 16(2), 361-388.
• Nijhof, K. S., & Engels, R. C. (2007). Parenting styles, coping strategies, and the expression of homesickness. Journal of Adolescence, 30(5), 709-720.
• Pinquart, M. (2016). Associations of parenting styles and dimensions with academic achievement in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 475-493.
• Pong, S. L., Johnston, J., & Chen, V. (2010). Authoritarian parenting and Asian adolescent school performance: Insights from the US and Taiwan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(1), 62-72.
• Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., & Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(3), 548-557.
• Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., & Montgomery, N. (2015). Parent and child traits associated with overparenting. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(6), 569-595.
• Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2020). The power of showing up: How parental presence shapes who our kids become and how their brains get wired. Ballantine Books.
• Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (2002). Culture structures the environment for development. Human Development, 45(4), 270-274.
• Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. Brunner/Mazel.
• Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Baumrind, D. (2005). Patterns of Parental Authority and Adolescent Autonomy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 108, 61-69.
• Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting Style as Context: An Integrative Model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487-496.
• Pinquart, M., & Kauser, R. (2018). Do the Associations of Parenting Styles With Behaviour Problems and Academic Achievement Vary by Culture? Results From a Meta-Analysis. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 24(1), 75-100.

Suggested Books

• Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2016). The Whole-Brain Child: 12 Revolutionary Strategies to Nurture Your Child’s Developing Mind. Bantam Books.
  • Explores how brain development affects children’s behaviour and offers practical approaches for nurturing emotionally intelligent children whilst respecting different parenting philosophies.
• Steinberg, L. (2004). The Ten Basic Principles of Good Parenting. Simon & Schuster.
  • Provides evidence-based, practical guidance for parents drawing on decades of research on different parenting styles and their outcomes.
• Hughes, D. A., & Baylin, J. (2012). Brain-Based Parenting: The Neuroscience of Caregiving for Healthy Attachment. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Examines how parental brain functioning influences parenting styles and offers practical strategies for building secure attachment relationships.

Recommended Websites

• Child Development Institute
  • Offers comprehensive resources on various parenting styles, child development stages, and practical tools for implementing effective parenting techniques.
• Harvard University’s Center on the Developing Child
  • Provides research-based information on how early experiences, including parenting approaches, shape brain architecture and influence lifelong learning, behaviour, and health.
• The Gottman Institute
  • Features evidence-based resources on emotion coaching and relationship-focused parenting approaches, with practical guides for building emotional intelligence in children.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

To cite this article use:

Early Years TV Types of Parenting Styles: Differences and Impact on Children. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/parenting-styles (Accessed: 17 April 2025).

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile