Neil Postman’s Theory on Media, Childhood, and Education

A Comprehensive Guide for Early Years Professionals and Students

Neil Postman, a media theorist and educator, critically examined how media and technology shape childhood, education, and culture. His work remains influential for understanding the effects of a rapidly evolving media environment on children’s development and learning.

Postman’s theories highlight the risks of media oversaturation, advocating for intentional approaches to technology in education. For Early Years professionals, educators and students, his ideas provide a framework for creating learning environments that prioritise critical thinking, meaningful interaction, and the preservation of childhood.

Brief Overview of Main Ideas

Postman argued that media influences how we perceive and process information, often eroding boundaries between childhood and adulthood. He explored:

• The Disappearance of Childhood: Media exposes children to adult realities prematurely.
• Amusing Ourselves to Death: Television and entertainment-focused media dilute critical discourse.
• The End of Education: Schools must provide purposeful narratives, not just technical skills.

These insights are particularly relevant for early years educators striving to foster balanced, curiosity-driven learning.

Early Years professionals can apply Postman’s ideas to:

• Limit screen time and emphasise play and hands-on activities.
• Encourage critical media literacy by modelling thoughtful media engagement.
• Foster community connections and narratives that nurture children’s sense of belonging and purpose.

Understanding Postman equips educators to promote children’s well-being and safeguard their developmental needs.

This article covers:

• Postman’s theories and their relevance to early childhood education.
• Practical strategies for applying his ideas in classrooms and homes.
• Examples of implementation and comparisons with other influential educational theorists.

Discover how Postman’s insights can enrich your teaching, inspire your practice, and support children in a media-exposed world, read on to explore and understand his theories in depth.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction and Background

In a world increasingly shaped by technology, few thinkers have been as prescient and provocative as Neil Postman (1931-2003) in examining media’s impact on childhood, education, and public discourse. Born in New York City to Jewish immigrant parents from Eastern Europe, Postman’s early experiences with antisemitism and exposure to diverse ideas laid the foundation for his life’s work critiquing mass media and advocating for humanistic education (Postman, 1988).

Education and Early Career

Postman’s educational journey began at State University of New York at Fredonia, where he earned a bachelor’s degree in education. He went on to receive a master’s degree and Ed.D. from Columbia University’s Teachers College (Postman, 1988). During his graduate studies, Postman was influenced by media theorist Marshall McLuhan, who famously argued that “the medium is the message” (McLuhan, 1964). This idea that the form of media shapes its content and effects on society would profoundly shape Postman’s thinking.

Postman started his career teaching at San Francisco State University before returning to New York University in 1959. There he founded the Media Ecology program, a field of study examining media environments and their effects on human perception, understanding, values and culture (Postman, 1970). Postman chaired the Department of Culture and Communication at NYU’s Steinhardt School of Education until his retirement in 2002.

Examining Media, Technology and Education

Throughout his prolific career, Postman authored over 200 magazine and newspaper articles and 20 books (Postman, 1988). His incisive social commentary challenged educators, parents, and the general public to reflect critically on taken-for-granted assumptions about media, technology, childhood and schooling that he argued were eroding the foundations of democratic society.

Postman’s key works included:

• Teaching as a Subversive Activity (1969)
• Teaching as a Conserving Activity (1979)
• The Disappearance of Childhood (1982)
• Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985)
• Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology (1992)
• The End of Education (1995)

Each book built on Postman’s central thesis that every medium of communication has embedded biases shaping what information is conveyed, how it is processed, and to what ends – with far-reaching implications for children’s development, the purpose of education, and the health of public discourse.

This article will explore the core ideas Postman developed across his career, their practical applications in early childhood and primary education, and Postman’s enduring relevance in our digital age. By tracing the evolution of his thought and situating it in dialogue with other key theorists, we hope to illuminate why Postman’s voice still speaks to the essential role of educators in helping students navigate an increasingly mediated world with intelligence, humanity and purpose.

Postman’s Key Theories and Ideas

Across his many books and essays, Neil Postman developed a rich body of interrelated theories critiquing the impact of media and technology on childhood, education, and society. Three of his most influential works – The Disappearance of Childhood (1982), Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985), and The End of Education (1995) – merit closer examination for their long-lasting insights and enduring relevance to educators.

The Disappearance of Childhood

In The Disappearance of Childhood, Postman traced the historical emergence of childhood as a distinct stage of life requiring special protection and preparation. He argued this conception arose in the mid-15th century with the advent of the printing press and spread of literacy, which created new distinctions between child and adult knowledge and activities (Postman, 1982).

However, Postman warned that the rise of electronic media in the 20th century, especially television, was rapidly eroding these boundaries by giving children instant access to previously hidden aspects of adult life. As he wrote, “Television erodes the dividing line between childhood and adulthood in three ways, all having to do with its undifferentiated accessibility: first, because it requires no instruction to grasp its form; second, because it does not make complex demands on either mind or behavior; and third, because it does not segregate its audience” (Postman, 1982, p. 80).

The implications of childhood’s “disappearance” for educators are profound. If children are exposed from infancy to the realities of adult life, violence, and consumerism, how do we preserve a space for innocence, play, wonder, and learning? Postman urged teachers and parents to reassert their authority as gatekeepers and guides, creating environments free from the intrusion and influence of electronic media.

Some practical ways early childhood professionals can apply these ideas include:

• Minimising or eliminating screen time in classrooms and child care settings
• Providing ample time and space for open-ended, unstructured play
• Choosing classic or timeless toys, books, and learning materials over media-linked products
• Educating parents about the benefits of limiting children’s media consumption at home

By being intentional about the media environment, educators can help protect and prolong childhood as a unique period of life.

Amusing Ourselves to Death

Postman’s 1985 book Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business expanded his critique of television to examine its effects on politics, journalism, religion, and education. The core argument was that the medium of TV had transformed every aspect of public discourse into entertainment, reducing complex issues to soundbites and spectacle.

As Postman put it, “Our politics, religion, news, athletics, education and commerce have been transformed into congenial adjuncts of show business, largely without protest or even much popular notice. The result is that we are a people on the verge of amusing ourselves to death” (Postman, 1985, p. 3-4).

For educators, Amusing Ourselves to Death offers a cautionary tale about the limits of video-based learning. Postman contrasted the print-based education of the 18th and 19th centuries, which emphasised logic, analysis, and delayed gratification, with the fragmented, image-driven nature of television. As he observed, “In learning to read or write or do arithmetic (to cite the school’s three most important subjects), one submits to a discipline, and accepts that ‘good things come hard’…But television makes no such demands” (Postman, 1985).

The implications for the classroom are clear:

• Prioritise print literacy and sustained, focused attention over multimedia glitz
• structure lessons to build gradually, with a clear beginning, middle, and end
• teach children to be active, critical consumers rather than passive recipients of information
• model genuine inquiry, reasoned argument, and substantive discourse

In this way, education can serve as a vital counterbalance to the trivialising influence of mass media.

The End of Education

Postman’s 1995 book The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School directly addressed the crisis of purpose in schooling. He argued that in a pluralistic, secular society, schools could no longer rely on shared “gods” or narratives to give meaning and direction to their mission. In the absence of any compelling reason for education, schools had become directionless, rote-learning factories.

To restore a sense of purpose, Postman proposed five guiding metaphors or “narratives” that could animate education:

1. Spaceship Earth – the notion of humans as stewards of a fragile planet
2. The Fallen Angel – a view of history and knowledge as an opportunity for redemption
3. The American Experiment – the story of America as an ongoing test of democratic ideals
4. The Law of Diversity – the study of differences as key to understanding life
5. The Word Weavers/The World Makers – the power of language to create and shape reality

The point was not that these should be the only narratives, but that schools need some organising purpose beyond just cranking out future workers and consumers. Especially in early childhood, when children are forming their basic attitudes and identities, school should be a place that sparks imagination, instills ethics, and imputes meaning.

Some ways to apply these ideas:

• Create thematic units around big questions of ecology, history, culture, and communication
• Use storytelling, myths, and metaphors to engage children’s moral and existential sensibilities
• Structure the classroom as a microcosm of democracy, with opportunities to debate real issues
• Treat diversity as an asset, fostering curiosity about human differences and commonalities
• Emphasise language and literacy as tools for making sense of self, others, and the world

Taken together, these three key works exemplify the depth and continuity of Postman’s thought regarding media, children, and schooling. While each book can stand alone, they also build on and reinforce each other, creating a comprehensive vision of literacy as the foundation for preserving childhood, enriching public discourse, and restoring purpose to education in a technological age. In the next section, we will explore how early childhood professionals can apply these potent ideas in their specific contexts.

Applying Postman’s Ideas in Early Childhood Settings

While Postman’s critique of technology can seem daunting, it also empowers educators to take a more intentional, proactive, approach to shaping children’s media environment. By understanding the affordances and limitations of different media forms, we can make wise choices about the tools and experiences we provide in our classrooms.

At the outset, it is important to acknowledge the pervasive presence of screen media in most children’s lives outside of school. A 2020 Ofcom report found that “nearly all children aged 5-15 went online” and “over 82% of 3-4s went online” (p.1 & p.47). Given this reality, early childhood settings have a vital role to play in providing a counterbalance of embodied, multisensory, open-ended learning experiences.

One key way to apply Postman’s ideas is by prioritising print literacy as the bedrock of a meaning-centred education. This does not mean eliminating all electronic media, but rather being selective and purposeful about their use. Some strategies to consider:

• Make books the centre of your curriculum, with daily read-alouds, independent reading time, and literacy-rich play areas. Choose high-quality, age-appropriate texts that engage children’s imaginations and build vocabulary.
• Create a cosy, inviting reading nook with soft seating, good lighting, and attractive book displays. Rotate the selection regularly to maintain interest.
• Incorporate storytelling, poetry, songs, and wordplay into daily routines and transitions. Encourage children to be active participants by joining in refrains, making up new verses, or acting out scenes.
• Provide ample materials for writing and mark-making, such as journals, blank books, envelopes, clipboards, whiteboards, and various writing tools. Model writing for real purposes, such as making lists, labeling creations, or recording observations.
• When using digital media, choose interactive, open-ended programs that encourage creativity and problem-solving rather than passive viewing. Set clear time limits and balance screen time with hands-on activities.

Another way to enact Postman’s vision is by fostering substantive, age-appropriate discourse and inquiry. In a world of sound bites and superficial messaging, children need practice engaging in sustained, reasoned dialogue about things that matter. Some ideas:

• Use Socratic questioning to probe children’s thinking and encourage deeper reflection. Ask open-ended questions like “What makes you say that?”, “How do you know?”, or “Can you give an example?”.
• Model active listening and build on children’s ideas in discussion. Paraphrase their comments, connect threads of conversation, and guide them to consider alternative views.
• Introduce complex, meaningful themes that stretch children’s understanding and empathy. Explore topics like fairness, courage, conservation, or cultural diversity through books, art, roleplay, and real-world examples.
• Engage children in collaborative problem-solving around authentic issues in the classroom community. Brainstorm solutions, try them out, and reflect on what works to build a sense of collective efficacy.
• Create space for philosophical wonder and existential questions that arise in children’s play and conversation. Take their musings seriously and explore them together through dialogue, storytelling, and creative expression.

A final way to apply Postman’s ideas is by cultivating a sense of history, purpose, and interdependence as global citizens. In an age of instant gratification and individual consumption, children need guidance connecting their learning to larger narratives and meanings. Some suggestions:

• Study the histories and cultures of your community through field trips, guest speakers, and hands-on experiences. Help children develop a sense of place and appreciation for those who came before.
• Participate in service learning projects that address real needs and build relationships across generations. Partner with a local senior centre, food bank, or animal shelter to contribute time and talents.
• Mark the rhythms of the year through seasonal celebrations, rituals, and rites of passage that connect children to natural and cultural cycles. Create your own classroom traditions that instill a sense of belonging and significance.
• Use maps, globes, and first-hand accounts to expand children’s view of the world and their place in it. Compare and contrast life in different times and places to develop perspective and empathy.
• Empower children as active citizens by engaging them in age-appropriate decision-making and problem-solving around classroom rules, routines, and resources. Develop a shared sense of ownership and responsibility for the learning environment.

By intentionally shaping the media and learning environment in these ways, early childhood educators can create a “safe space” for the work of growing up in uncertain times. In preserving a protected realm of childhood wonder and meaning, we give children a foundation for lifelong learning and civic participation. Though the challenges of technological change are great, Postman reminds us of the power we wield as educators to construct a counternarrative of hope.

In our next section, we will explore further practical examples of how Postman’s ideas can be implemented in classrooms and learning centres. By understanding his theories in action, we can gain inspiration and concrete strategies for our own settings.

Practical Applications: Bringing Postman’s Theories to Life

To appreciate the transformative potential of Postman’s ideas, it is helpful to first envision the “default” classroom they are designed to disrupt. Picture a typical preschool or nursery room, with its brightly coloured plastic toys, electronic devices playing repetitive tunes, and TV screen flickering in the corner. Children flit from one activity to another, their attention spans fragmented by a constant barrage of stimuli. Adults hover nearby, offering generic praise and enforcing behavioural compliance. The overall atmosphere is one of controlled chaos, with little sense of coherence or purpose.

Now imagine a classroom designed with Postman’s principles in mind. Instead of garish décor and noisy devices, the space is filled with natural light, living plants, and open-ended materials like blocks, art supplies, and books. Children are engaged in sustained, focused play-building, creating, exploring, and conversing with peers and adults. There is a palpable sense of community and shared endeavour. The teacher leads group discussions and activities around meaningful themes, encouraging children to think deeply and express themselves clearly. While technology is present, it is used intentionally and in moderation, balanced with ample time for hands-on learning and face-to-face interaction.

The contrast between these two environments illustrates the profound shift that occurs when we design learning spaces with Postman’s ideas in mind. But what does this look like in practice? Let’s create an example.

Case Study: Nursery School

The following is a fictional case study to put theory into context: Early Years Nursery School in Manchester provides an example of how Postman’s ideas can be applied even in a technology-rich environment. The school recently undertook a comprehensive review of its use of electronic media, guided by Postman’s concept of media ecology. As deputy headteacher Miss Jones explains, “We realised we had fallen into the trap of using technology for technology’s sake, without really considering how it was shaping our learning environment”.

In response, the school developed a new media policy based on three key principles:

1. Intentionality – All use of electronic media must have a clear educational purpose and be integrated into the curriculum in a meaningful way.
2. Balance – Screen time should be limited and balanced with ample opportunities for hands-on learning, outdoor play, and social interaction.
3. Interaction – Technology should be used to facilitate active engagement and creativity, not passive consumption. Teachers should co-view and co-play with children, using media as a springboard for discussion and further learning.

Guided by these principles, Early Years Nursery has transformed how it uses technology. Instead of playing animated videos on loop, teachers now select short, high-quality clips that tie into current learning themes. After viewing, children are encouraged to ask questions, make connections, and extend their learning through related books, art projects, or dramatic play.

The school has also introduced “media mentors” – older children who help younger ones navigate new technologies and model responsible use. These mentors learn valuable skills in communication, problem-solving, and leadership while reinforcing their own understanding. By making technology use a social, scaffolded process, the school helps children develop critical media literacy skills.

Finally, Early Years Nursery has made a conscious effort to balance digital learning with analogue alternatives. Children now spend less time on tablets and more time with real books, maps, and manipulatives. Teachers have found that this tangible engagement often leads to richer, more memorable learning experiences. As one educator put it, “There’s something magical about spreading out a giant floor map and letting children crawl around on it, physically tracing routes with their fingers. It brings geography to life in a way that a digital map never could”.

Early Years Nursery’s approach demonstrates an example of how Postman’s principles could be adapted to different contexts:

• Being intentional and selective about media use
• Balancing screen time with embodied, social learning
• Using technology to enhance rather than replace human interaction
• Developing children’s media literacy and critical thinking skills
• Providing a rich range of analogue and digital learning experiences

By thoughtfully integrating technology into a holistic, relational pedagogy, Early Years Nursery is influenced by Postman’s vision, while still preparing children for the realities of a digital world.

Applying These Examples in Your Own Setting

As the case study illustrates, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to applying Postman’s ideas in the classroom. Each school must find its own way, based on its unique context, values, and community. However, some common threads emerge that can guide our own experimentation:

1. Start with a clear vision and purpose. What kinds of learners and people do you want to nurture? How can your use of media and technology support that vision? Involve all stakeholders – children, staff, families – in articulating a shared philosophy.
2. Audit your current media environment. Take stock of all the ways electronic media are used in your setting – from background TV to tablet games to online assessments. Ask yourself: Is each instance intentional, balanced, and interactive? Does it enhance or detract from hands-on learning and human connection? Don’t be afraid to make changes where needed.
3. Emphasise real-world, multisensory learning. Look for ways to ground abstract concepts in concrete experiences. Bring in natural materials, artefacts, and tools that children can explore with all their senses. Take learning outside whenever possible, and create opportunities for sustained, focused engagement.
4. Facilitate meaningful dialogue and reflection. Use open-ended questions, Socratic discussion, and philosophical enquiry to help children make sense of their experiences. Encourage them to express their ideas through multiple modes – talking, drawing, writing, roleplay. Document and display their thinking to revisit over time.
5. Foster intergenerational and community connections. Invite parents, elders, and local experts to share their knowledge and stories with the class. Participate in community events and service projects that give children a sense of history and belonging. Use technology to connect with other classrooms and cultures in authentic ways.
6. Model and teach media literacy skills. When you do use electronic media, co-view and co-play with children. Help them analyse and question the messages they receive. Give them opportunities to create their own media content for real audiences and purposes. Develop clear guidelines for safe, ethical, and responsible media use.
7. Embrace trial and error. Implementing Postman’s ideas is an ongoing process of experimentation, reflection, and adjustment. Be willing to try new things, learn from mistakes, and adapt as needed. Seek out professional development and networking opportunities to grow your practice.

By engaging in this iterative process of theory-informed action and reflection, we can create learning environments that honour childhood, cultivate meaning, and prepare students for the challenges and opportunities of a media-saturated world. Postman’s legacy invites us to imagine education not as a means to a predetermined end, but as an open-ended journey of discovery and growth for both teachers and learners. In the next section, we will consider how Postman’s ideas compare with and complement other influential thinkers in early childhood education.

Comparison of Postman With Other Theorists

To fully appreciate the significance of Neil Postman’s ideas for early childhood education, it is helpful to consider how they compare and contrast with those of other major theorists in the field. By examining Postman’s theories alongside those of his contemporaries and predecessors, we can gain a richer understanding of his distinctive perspective and enduring influence.

Postman and Piaget: Cognitive Development in a Mediated World

• Both Postman and Piaget emphasised the active role of the child in constructing knowledge through interaction with the environment.
• They shared a belief in the importance of hands-on, experiential learning that engages children’s natural curiosity and sense-making capacities.
• However, Postman’s focus on the social and cultural dimensions of learning sets him apart from Piaget’s more individualistic, cognitive approach.
• Postman’s work extends Piaget’s ideas by considering how changes in communication technology alter the conditions of cognitive development.

One key figure whose work invites comparison with Postman’s is Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, renowned for his theory of cognitive development. Like Postman, Piaget emphasised the active role of the child in constructing knowledge through interaction with the environment (Piaget, 1954). He proposed that children move through four stages – sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational – each characterised by distinct ways of thinking and learning.

Postman’s views on childhood and education, while not directly derived from Piaget’s, share some important commonalities. Both thinkers stressed the importance of hands-on, experiential learning that engages children’s natural curiosity and sense-making capacities. Postman’s advocacy for “convivial tools” that expand rather than limit human agency aligns with Piaget’s emphasis on the child as an active explorer and problem-solver (Postman, 1993).

However, Postman’s focus on the social and cultural dimensions of learning sets him apart from Piaget’s more individualistic, cognitive approach. For Postman, the child’s developing mind cannot be understood apart from the symbolic environment that shapes it. His concern with the erosion of childhood by electronic media reflects a view of development as intimately bound up with societal norms and values.

Consider, for example, how Postman’s analysis of the impact of television on children’s attention spans and capacity for abstract thought extends Piaget’s ideas. While Piaget recognised the role of language and social interaction in cognitive growth, he did not fully anticipate how changes in communication technology would alter the very conditions of development. Postman’s work highlights the need to adapt Piaget’s insights to a rapidly evolving media landscape.
Read our in-depth article on Jean Piaget here.

Postman and Vygotsky: The Social Formation of Mind

• Postman and Vygotsky both emphasised the ways in which children’s thinking is shaped by the tools, symbols, and social practices of their time and place.
• They shared a view of language and literacy as playing a central role in cognitive and social development.
• However, Postman was more explicitly critical of how electronic media, particularly television, may undermine the social and cognitive benefits of print literacy.
• Postman’s work can be seen as an effort to preserve the intellectual gains of earlier communication revolutions in the face of new technological challenges.

This attention to the cultural context of learning links Postman more closely with another major theorist, Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky. Like Postman, Vygotsky emphasised the ways in which children’s thinking is shaped by the tools, symbols, and social practices of their time and place (Vygotsky, 1978). His concept of the “zone of proximal development” – the space between what a child can do alone and what they can do with guidance from a more knowledgeable other – resonates with Postman’s view of education as a process of cultural transmission.

For both thinkers, language and literacy play a central role in cognitive and social development. Vygotsky saw the acquisition of speech as a pivotal moment that transforms thinking from a primarily sensory-motor to a symbolic activity. Similarly, Postman argued that the invention of writing and print ushered in a new mode of thought based on linear, analytical reasoning (Postman, 1985). Both recognised how changes in dominant forms of communication alter not just what we think about, but how we think.

However, Postman was more explicitly critical of the ways in which electronic media – particularly television – undermine the social and cognitive benefits of print literacy. While Vygotsky saw tools and symbols as enabling new forms of thought, Postman warned that not all media are equally supportive of reflective, rational discourse. His call to reassert the value of book learning in an age of screen-based stimulation can be seen as an effort to preserve the social and intellectual gains of earlier communication revolutions.
Read our in-depth article on Lev Vygotsky here.

Postman and Montessori: Prepared Environments for Lifelong Learning

• Postman and Montessori both believed that children’s surroundings play a crucial role in shaping their development.
• They shared an emphasis on grounding education in children’s concrete, sensory experiences of the world.
• Montessori’s manipulative materials exemplify the kind of “convivial tools” that Postman advocated for fostering curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking.
• However, Postman’s critique of technology as a potential distraction from deeper learning serves as a caution for Montessori educators in the digital age.

This emphasis on the formative power of the learning environment suggests another fruitful comparison, this time with Italian physician and educator Maria Montessori. Like Postman, Montessori believed that children’s surroundings play a crucial role in shaping their development. Her concept of the “prepared environment” – a carefully designed space equipped with materials that invite exploration and discovery – shares much in common with Postman’s vision of a learning ecology that fosters curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking (Montessori, 1912/1964).

Both Postman and Montessori emphasised the importance of grounding education in children’s concrete, sensory experiences of the world. Montessori’s manipulative materials, which isolate key concepts and skills for focused practice, exemplify the kind of “convivial tools” that Postman advocated. By allowing children to work at their own pace and follow their own interests, the Montessori classroom embodies Postman’s ideal of education as a self-directed, meaning-making process.

At the same time, Postman’s critique of technology as a potential distraction from deeper learning serves as a caution for Montessori educators in the digital age. While many Montessori classrooms have successfully integrated computers and other electronic media, Postman reminds us to be intentional about their use and wary of their capacity to fragment attention and supplant hands-on experience. His call to balance technology with other modes of learning is especially relevant as more Montessori schools grapple with the challenges and opportunities of e-learning.
Read our in-depth article on Maria Montessori here.

Postman and Dewey: Education for Democracy

• Postman and Dewey both saw schools as microcosms of society, places where children could practice the skills and dispositions needed for engaged citizenship.
• They shared a commitment to education as a tool for social progress and democracy, rejecting the notion of schooling as mere preparation for future life.
• Postman’s emphasis on the role of education in preserving cultural heritage and fostering a sense of shared purpose aligns closely with Dewey’s concept of the school as a miniature community.
• However, Postman was more pessimistic than Dewey about the ability of schools to fulfill their civic mission in an age of mass media.

No discussion of Postman’s place in educational thought would be complete without reference to American philosopher John Dewey, whose pragmatic vision of education as a tool for social progress and democracy deeply informed Postman’s own views. Like Postman, Dewey rejected the notion of education as a preparation for future life in favour of an approach that engages children in meaningful, real-world learning experiences (Dewey, 1916/1944). Both saw schools as microcosms of society, places where children could practice the skills and dispositions needed for engaged citizenship.

Postman’s emphasis on the role of education in preserving cultural heritage and fostering a sense of shared purpose aligns closely with Dewey’s concept of the school as a miniature community. By participating in collaborative inquiry and problem-solving, Dewey believed, children would develop the habits of critical thinking, communication, and cooperation essential for democratic life. Similarly, Postman argued that schools must provide a common narrative that binds students together as members of a culture with a stake in its future (Postman, 1995).

However, Postman was more pessimistic than Dewey about the ability of schools to fulfill this civic mission in an age of mass media. While Dewey saw education as a powerful force for social transformation, Postman feared that the rise of television and other electronic media was eroding the very foundations of democratic discourse. His call for a more critical, humanistic approach to technology can be seen as an attempt to revitalize Dewey’s vision of education for a new era.
Read our in-depth article on John Dewey here.

Synthesis: Postman’s Unique Perspective

• Postman’s work challenges and extends earlier theories by considering how changes in communication technology alter the conditions of cognitive and social development.
• His critique of electronic media highlights the need to consider the civic dimensions of schooling and the role of education in preserving cultural heritage.
• Postman’s legacy lies in his insistence on asking big questions about the purposes and values underlying our educational practices.
• He challenges us to create learning environments that equip children with essential skills while also inspiring curiosity, compassion, and a sense of civic responsibility.

By situating Postman’s ideas in dialogue with those of Piaget, Vygotsky, Montessori, and Dewey, we can begin to appreciate his unique perspective on learning and development in the mediated world. Like these other thinkers, Postman recognises the active, constructive nature of children’s minds and the formative power of their social and symbolic environments. He shares their commitment to hands-on, experiential education that engages the whole child in making meaning of the world.

Yet Postman’s work also challenges and extends these earlier theories in important ways. His critique of television and other electronic media highlights the need to consider how changes in communication technology alter the very conditions of cognitive and social development. By showing how different media forms shape not just what we think about, but how we think, Postman opens up new avenues for research and practice at the intersection of education, technology, and culture.

At the same time, Postman’s emphasis on the role of education in preserving cultural heritage and fostering a sense of shared purpose serves as a corrective to more individualistic approaches that neglect the civic dimensions of schooling. His call for schools to provide a common narrative that binds students together as members of a community with a stake in its future takes on new urgency in an age of increasing polarization and fragmentation.

Ultimately, what sets Postman apart is his insistence on asking big questions about the purposes and values underlying our educational practices. At a time when schools are under pressure to adopt the latest technologies and meet the demands of a global economy, Postman reminds us to step back and consider what kind of human beings and society we hope to cultivate. His legacy challenges us to create learning environments that not only equip children with the skills they need to succeed, but also inspire them to live with curiosity, compassion, and a sense of civic responsibility.

Critiques and Limitations of Postman’s Theories

While Neil Postman’s ideas about media, childhood, and education continue to resonate with many readers, it is important to acknowledge and examine potential criticisms of his work. By grappling with the limitations of his arguments, we can arrive at a more nuanced understanding of their enduring relevance and consider how they might need to be updated or adapted for our current context.

Technological Determinism and Nostalgia

One common critique of Postman’s work is that it sometimes veers into a form of technological determinism – the idea that technology shapes society in inevitable ways, independent of human agency or choice (Smith & Marx, 1994). In his more polemical moments, Postman could paint a rather bleak, one-sided picture of media’s impact on culture, as if the mere existence of television or computers necessarily degraded public discourse and childhood experience.

• Critics argue that Postman’s views oversimplify the complex, reciprocal relationship between technology and society.
• They suggest his arguments sometimes rely on a romanticized view of the past, as if the print-based culture of the 18th and 19th centuries was an idyllic golden age untainted by the problems he associates with electronic media (Moran, 2005).
• Some see Postman’s pessimism about technology as a form of elitism that fails to acknowledge the democratizing and educational potential of new media forms (Bogost, 2008).

While these criticisms have some validity, some argue they do not negate the core insights of Postman’s approach. Postman’s key point was not that all technology is inherently bad, but that we need to be more thoughtful and intentional about how we integrate new media into our lives and learning environments. He challenged us to consider the biases and limitations of our tools, and to preserve a space for the kind of sustained, linear thinking cultivated by print literacy.

Moreover, Postman’s later work, such as Building a Bridge to the 18th Century (1999), suggests a more nuanced view that is not simply anti-technology. Rather than advocating a return to the past, he used historical examples to argue for a balance between innovation and tradition, change and continuity. His goal was not to eliminate technology but to develop a more robust, humanistic media ecology that could better serve our social, intellectual, and spiritual needs.

The Changing Technological Landscape

Another limitation of Postman’s work is that much of it was written in response to the specific media environment of the 1970s-1990s, dominated by broadcast television and the early Internet. Some have argued that his ideas are less relevant in today’s digital, participatory media landscape, where interactivity, user-generated content, and multimedia literacies are increasingly central (Jenkins, 2006).

• Children today are not just passive consumers of media but active creators, using platforms like YouTube, Minecraft, and Roblox to make and share their own content (Ito et al., 2009).
• Schools have embraced multimedia production, coding, and other digital skills as essential for 21st-century learners (Gee, 2013).
• The rise of social media has blurred the boundaries between public and private, work and play, in ways that complicate Postman’s distinction between childhood and adulthood (Boyd, 2014).

While the specific media technologies and practices Postman critiqued have evolved, his underlying concerns about the cognitive, social, and political implications of our media environment remain as relevant as ever. If anything, the ubiquity of digital devices and the attention economy they support have only intensified the need for the kind of critical media literacy and “word-world” balance that Postman advocated.

Rather than seeing Postman’s ideas as outdated, we might reinterpret and adapt them for our current context:

• How can we harness the potential of digital media for creativity and expression while also cultivating the capacity for sustained attention and deep thinking?
• What would a “Postman-approved” approach to technology integration in schools look like, one that preserves a space for unmediated, hands-on learning and face-to-face interaction?
• How can we foster the kind of rich, values-driven education Postman envisioned in a globalized, multicultural world where the idea of a common narrative or cannon is increasingly contested?

Grappling with these questions, and revisiting Postman’s core insights in light of new technological and social realities, remains a vital task for educators and citizens alike.

The Need for Systemic Change

A final limitation of Postman’s work is that it focused primarily on the role of education and individual responsibility in responding to technological change, with less attention to the broader political and economic forces shaping our media environment. Some critics have argued that Postman’s emphasis on schools and families as bulwarks against the negative effects of media let corporations and policymakers off the hook (Kellner, 2005).

• Postman’s solutions, such as more critical media literacy education or limits on screen time for children, can seem inadequate in the face of the structural power of Big Tech and the attention economy.
• His faith in the power of education to counteract the influence of media may underestimate the degree to which schools themselves are shaped by the same economic and ideological pressures (Giroux, 2001).
• In an age of globalization, commercialization, and neoliberal education reform, it may not be enough to just cultivate individual resistance or create “oases” of humanistic learning within a larger technocratic system.

These critiques suggest that fully realising Postman’s vision of a more humane, ecologically balanced media environment will require systemic changes beyond the classroom. We need to look at how our educational, economic, and political institutions incentivize certain forms of media production and consumption over others, and work to create policies and practices that better align with our values and goals as a society.

At the same time, Postman’s emphasis on education as a key site of resistance and transformation remains essential. Schools may not be able to solve all our problems, but they can still cultivate the kind of critical consciousness, ethical orientation, and creative agency needed to imagine and build a better world. By creating learning environments that value presence over productivity, depth over speed, and people over products, educators can plant the seeds of a more humane media ecology.

Learning from Limitations: Adapting Postman for Today

Engaging with critiques and limitations of Postman’s work is not about dismissing his ideas but about making them stronger and more relevant for our time. By acknowledging the ways in which his arguments were shaped by specific historical and technological contexts, we can separate the essential insights from the accidental details and adapt them to new circumstances.

In this spirit, a “Postman for today” would encourage us to:

• Develop a critical media literacy that goes beyond just analyzing individual messages to examine the larger economic, political, and cultural systems in which media are produced and circulated.
• Cultivate a “both/and” approach to technology that harnesses its potential for creativity, connection, and learning while also preserving a space for unmediated, embodied, and contemplative practices.
• Create learning environments that foster a sense of history, purpose, and participation, using new media tools to enable students to actively construct knowledge and contribute to their communities.
• Work to align our educational, social, and technological practices with our deepest values and aspirations, resisting the instrumentalist logic of efficiency and instead asking “What kind of human beings and society do we want to nurture?”

By grappling with the limitations of Postman’s ideas and considering how to adapt them for a new era, we can carry forward his legacy of critical and humanistic engagement with media and technology. In the next section, we will explore some concrete examples of how educators, researchers, and activists are building on Postman’s work to create a more vibrant, responsible, and inclusive media ecology for the 21st century.

Legacy and Ongoing Influence

More than two decades after his passing, Neil Postman’s ideas continue to shape discourse and practice in education, media studies, and related fields. Despite the critiques and limitations discussed in the previous section, Postman’s core insights about the relationship between media, childhood, and schooling have proven remarkably durable, even as the specific technologies and social contexts he analysed have evolved. In this section, we will assess the enduring impact of Postman’s work, highlight some current research and initiatives that build on his ideas, and consider potential future directions for Postman-inspired scholarship and practice.

Enduring Impact on Education and Child Development

One key area where Postman’s influence remains strong is in the field of early childhood education. His critique of the disappearance of childhood in the electronic age, though controversial, helped to catalyze a renewed focus on the importance of play, creativity, and hands-on learning in the early years (Elkind, 2007). Many preschools and kindergartens today emphasize the kind of “convivial,” open-ended learning environments that Postman advocated, with a focus on fostering children’s natural curiosity and sense of wonder (Wein, 2008).

Postman’s ideas have also shaped ongoing debates about the role of technology in schools more broadly. His skepticism about computers in the classroom, though often oversimplified, anticipated many of the concerns raised by current critics of education technology, such as the risks of digital distraction, data privacy, and the commercialization of learning (Cuban, 2017). At the same time, Postman’s vision of a “loving resistance” to technology – one that critically engages with new media while preserving humanistic values – has inspired a growing movement of educators seeking to integrate technology in more thoughtful, purposeful ways (Hodgson, 2010).

Perhaps most significantly, Postman’s emphasis on the role of education in cultivating a sense of history, meaning, and shared purpose continues to resonate in an era of increasing fragmentation and polarization. His call for schools to provide a “narrative for the nation” – one that balances diversity and unity, tradition and change – feels more urgent than ever as educators grapple with how to prepare students for an uncertain future (Postman, 1999). While the specific narratives Postman proposed may not fit our current context, his underlying vision of education as a means of cultural transmission and renewal remains vital.

Current Research and Initiatives

Postman’s ideas have also inspired a wide range of current research and initiatives in education, media studies, and related fields. Here are just a few examples:

• Media literacy education: Postman’s emphasis on cultivating critical thinking about media has informed the growth of media literacy programs around the world. Organizations like the National Association for Media Literacy Education (NAMLE) and the Center for Media Literacy (CML) draw on Postman’s work to develop curricula and resources for helping students navigate our increasingly complex media environment (Jolls & Wilson, 2014).
• Slow education movement: Postman’s critique of the acceleration and fragmentation of learning in the electronic age has inspired a “slow education” movement that emphasizes depth over speed, quality over quantity, and presence over productivity (Jacobs, 2018). Slow education advocates draw on Postman’s ideas to argue for more experiential, place-based, and contemplative pedagogies that cultivate sustained attention and deep engagement.
• Digital wellness initiatives: Postman’s warnings about the potential cognitive and social costs of excessive screen time have taken on new urgency in the age of smartphones and social media. A growing number of schools, organizations, and individuals are developing digital wellness initiatives that encourage more balanced, intentional relationships with technology (Portwood-Stacer, 2014). These efforts often draw on Postman’s vision of a “loving resistance” to media that preserves space for unmediated, embodied experiences.
• Reclaiming conversation: Postman’s emphasis on the importance of face-to-face interaction and sustained dialogue has informed recent work on the decline of conversation in the digital age. For example, psychologist Sherry Turkle (2015) draws on Postman’s ideas to argue for the need to “reclaim conversation” as a means of deeper connection, empathy, and self-reflection in a technology-saturated culture.
• Postman’s prophetic voice: Finally, Postman’s role as a public intellectual and cultural critic continues to inspire scholars and educators who see their work as a form of social and moral engagement. In an age of academic specialization and market-driven research, Postman’s example reminds us of the importance of speaking truth to power, asking big questions, and using our platforms to spark public dialogue and debate (McKibben, 2019).

These examples illustrate the range and vitality of Postman’s ongoing influence across disciplines and domains. By engaging with his ideas critically and creatively, researchers and practitioners are finding new ways to apply his insights to the challenges and opportunities of our time.

Future Directions for Postman-Inspired Research

Looking ahead, there are many potential directions for future research and practice that build on Postman’s legacy. Here are a few possibilities:

1. Updating Postman for the digital age: One fruitful area for future work would be to revisit Postman’s key ideas and arguments in light of current technological and social realities. How might his insights about media ecology, childhood, and education be extended or modified to account for the rise of social media, artificial intelligence, virtual/augmented reality, and other emerging technologies? What new forms of literacy, creativity, and critical thinking are needed to navigate an increasingly complex and global media landscape?
2. Developing Postman-inspired pedagogies: Another direction for future research would be to develop and test new pedagogical approaches that embody Postman’s vision of education as a means of cultivating meaning, purpose, and civic engagement. What might a “Postman-approved” curriculum look like in practice? How can we create learning environments that balance innovation and tradition, diversity and unity, individuality and community? How can we use technology in ways that enhance rather than erode human values and relationships?
3. Exploring the neuroscience of attention: Postman’s work also raises important questions about the cognitive and neurological dimensions of attention, distraction, and deep engagement. How does our media environment shape brain development and function, especially in young children? What are the long-term effects of digital multitasking and information overload on learning, memory, and well-being? How can we cultivate the kind of sustained, focused attention that Postman saw as essential for meaningful learning and living?
4. Imagining alternative futures: Finally, Postman’s work invites us to imagine and create alternative futures for education, technology, and society. Rather than simply accepting the status quo or succumbing to dystopian fears, how can we envision and enact more humane, equitable, and life-affirming ways of living and learning together? What new narratives, practices, and institutions might help us to realize Postman’s vision of a world in which technology serves rather than subverts human values and aspirations?

These are just a few of the many potential directions for future research and practice that Postman’s legacy inspires. By continuing to engage with his ideas critically and creatively, we can carry forward his commitment to asking big questions, sparking public dialogue, and using education as a means of individual and social transformation.

Summary: Thoughts on Postman’s Ongoing Influence

In conclusion, Neil Postman’s enduring influence and legacy are a testament to the power of ideas to shape our understanding and imagination of what is possible in education and society. While some of his specific arguments and examples may feel dated, his underlying insights about the relationship between media, technology, childhood, and schooling remain as relevant and urgent as ever. By grappling with his work critically and creatively, we can continue to draw inspiration and guidance for navigating the challenges and opportunities of our time.

Whether we are educators, researchers, parents, or concerned citizens, Postman’s legacy invites us to ask deeper questions about the purpose and meaning of education in a technological age. It challenges us to resist the instrumentalist logic of efficiency and control, and to cultivate a more humanistic vision of learning as a means of personal and social awakening. And it reminds us of the vital role that schools can play in preserving cultural memory, fostering civic engagement, and nurturing the next generation of thoughtful, creative, and compassionate human beings.

As we look to the future, let us continue to engage with Postman’s ideas not as a set of fixed prescriptions but as a living tradition of inquiry, critique, and imagination. By doing so, we can honour his legacy not through blind adherence but through ongoing dialogue, experimentation, and adaptation to the needs and realities of our time.

Conclusion

Throughout this article, we have explored the life, ideas, and enduring influence of Neil Postman, a provocative and prophetic thinker regarding education and technology in the 20th century. By situating Postman’s work within the broader context of educational theory and practice, we have seen how his insights into media ecology, childhood, and the purpose of schooling continue to resonate in our own time, even as the specific technologies and social conditions he analysed have evolved.

From his critique of television’s impact on public discourse and the erosion of childhood to his call for schools to provide a unifying narrative in a fragmented world, Postman’s ideas challenge us to think more deeply about the relationship between media, culture, and learning. While some of his arguments may be overstated or limited by their historical context, his underlying concerns about the cognitive, social, and moral implications of our media environment remain as urgent as ever in the digital age.

By comparing Postman’s ideas with those of other influential thinkers like Piaget, Vygotsky, Montessori, and Dewey, we have seen how his work both complements and complicates their insights into child development, learning, and the role of education in society. While Postman shared their emphasis on active, experiential learning and the importance of social interaction, he also brought a unique perspective on the ways in which media and technology shape our consciousness and culture in often unexamined ways.

Through examining his theory via fictional case studies of schools putting Postman’s ideas into practice, we have seen how his vision of a more humane, ecologically balanced approach to technology and learning can be realised in concrete ways. From media literacy programs and “slow education” initiatives to efforts to reclaim conversation and cultivate digital wellness, Postman’s legacy continues to inspire educators and innovators around the world.

As we have seen, engaging with critiques and limitations of Postman’s work is not about dismissing his ideas but about making them stronger and more relevant for our time. By acknowledging how his arguments were shaped by specific historical and technological contexts, we can separate the essential insights from the accidental details and adapt them to new circumstances. In this way, Postman’s work becomes not a set of fixed prescriptions but a living tradition of inquiry, critique, and imagination.

Ultimately, the enduring significance of Postman’s work lies in his commitment to asking fundamental questions about the purpose and meaning of education in a technological age. At a time when schools are under increasing pressure to adapt to the demands of a fast-paced, innovation-obsessed culture, Postman reminds us of the value of preserving a space for slower, deeper, more contemplative modes of learning and being. He challenges us to resist the instrumentalist view of education as job training and to cultivate a more holistic vision of learning as a means of personal and social awakening.

For early childhood professionals, Postman’s ideas offer both a cautionary tale and an inspiring vision. On the one hand, his work reminds us of the need to protect young children from the commercialization and adultification of culture, and to preserve a space for unstructured play, exploration, and wonder in an age of digital distraction. On the other hand, he also invites us to see early childhood education as a vital opportunity to lay the foundations for a more humane, democratic, and life-affirming society.

As we look to the future, let us take up Postman’s challenge to use education as a means of imagining and creating alternative futures – ones that put human values and relationships at the centre of our technological and social systems. Whether we are researchers, educators, policymakers, or parents, we all have a role to play in shaping the narrative and practices of learning in the 21st century. By engaging with Postman’s ideas critically and creatively, we can honour his legacy not through blind adherence but through ongoing dialogue, experimentation, and adaptation to the needs and realities of our time.

So let us continue to ask the big questions, to spark public conversation, and to work towards a vision of education that balances innovation and tradition, individuality and community, diversity and unity. Let us create learning environments that cultivate not just the skills and knowledge children need to succeed in a changing world, but also the wisdom, compassion, and sense of purpose they need to thrive as human beings. And let us remember, as Postman did, that the ultimate aim of education is not to master the machine, but to nurture the human spirit in all its complexity and potential.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who was Neil Postman?

Neil Postman (1931-2003) was an American author, educator, media theorist and cultural critic. He was a professor of media ecology at New York University for over 40 years. Postman is best known for his critical analysis of the effects of television and other electronic media on education, childhood, and public discourse in books such as “Amusing Ourselves to Death” (1985) and “The Disappearance of Childhood” (1982).

2. What is Neil Postman’s theory?

Postman’s primary theory, known as media ecology, holds that the ways we communicate shape our perceptions, values, and social structures. He argued that each medium of communication has its own unique biases that favour certain kinds of content and thinking. For example, he contrasted the print-based culture of the 18th century, which encouraged linear, rational thought, with the image-based culture of television, which promoted a fragmented, entertainment-oriented mindset. Postman believed that as societies adopt new media, they often unconsciously adapt to the embedded biases of these technologies.

3. What did Neil Postman say about technology?

Postman was a vocal critic of the uncritical adoption of new technologies, particularly television and computers. He argued that every technology is both a burden and a blessing, and that we need to carefully consider the trade-offs of embracing new tools. Postman warned that the rapid pace of technological change was eroding important social institutions and practices, such as childhood, education, and public discourse. He called for a more cautious, reflective approach to innovation that prioritized human values over efficiency or novelty.

4. Why did Neil Postman think technology was bad?

While Postman is often portrayed as a Luddite or technophobe, his views on technology were more nuanced than a simple good/bad dichotomy. He did not think all technology was inherently negative, but rather that certain technologies, if adopted uncritically, could have unintended consequences that undermined human values and social bonds. For example, he argued that television’s bias toward visual spectacle and sound bites was corroding the quality of public discourse and political debate. Similarly, he worried that computers in schools would shift the focus of education from meaning-making to information processing. Postman’s goal was not to eliminate technology but to develop a more robust critical framework for evaluating its impact on culture and consciousness.

5. What did Neil Postman believe about education?

Postman was a strong advocate for the traditional liberal arts education model, which emphasized broad knowledge, critical thinking skills, and moral reasoning. He argued that the primary purpose of education was not to prepare students for specific jobs but to help them make sense of the world and their place in it. Postman was critical of attempts to “technologize” education through programmed instruction or an overemphasis on science and mathematics at the expense of the humanities. He believed schools should serve as a counterbalance to the biases of popular media, cultivating habits of mind such as contemplation, analysis, and sustained attention that were being eroded by electronic culture.

6. What is the disappearance of childhood theory?

In his book “The Disappearance of Childhood,” Postman argued that the concept of childhood as a distinct stage of life characterized by innocence, play, and protection from adult secrets was a historically recent invention made possible by the rise of print culture and formal schooling. However, he believed that electronic media, particularly television, were eroding the boundaries between childhood and adulthood by giving young people unprecedented access to information and experiences previously reserved for mature audiences. As a result, children were being prematurely exposed to the harsh realities of the adult world without the cognitive and emotional maturity to process them. Postman called for a renewed commitment to preserving childhood as a time of exploration, wonder, and gradual initiation into the responsibilities of public life.

7. What is media ecology theory?

Media ecology is a theoretical framework that studies the ways in which communication technologies shape human perception, understanding, feeling, and values. Developed by Postman and other scholars such as Marshall McLuhan, Walter Ong, and Harold Innis, media ecology views media as environments that structure our experiences and interactions in often invisible ways. Just as organisms adapt to their biological surroundings, humans adapt to the biases and affordances of their media environments, often without conscious awareness. Media ecologists study the history and evolution of communication technologies, from oral cultures to the printing press to digital media, in order to better understand their social, psychological, and cultural effects.

8. What does “amusing ourselves to death” mean?

“Amusing Ourselves to Death” is the title of Postman’s best-known book, published in 1985. In it, he argued that the rise of television as the dominant medium of communication was transforming public discourse from a rational, print-based exchange of ideas into a form of entertainment that trivialized serious topics and reduced complex issues to simplistic sound bites. Postman warned that a culture that valued amusement above all else would lose its capacity for critical thinking, civic engagement, and meaningful dialogue. He saw this as a grave threat to democracy, which requires an informed and actively involved citizenry to function properly. The phrase “amusing ourselves to death” captures Postman’s fear that our addiction to easy pleasures and distractions was eroding our ability to grapple with the essential questions and challenges of our time.

References

• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
• Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. The Free Press. (Original work published 1916)
• Gee, J. P. (2013). The anti-education era: Creating smarter students through digital learning. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Giroux, H. A. (2001). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Bergin & Garvey.
• Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H. A., Lange, P. G., Mahendran, D., Martínez, K. Z., Pascoe, C. J., Perkel, D., Robinson, L., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. MIT Press.
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
• Kellner, D. (2005). Media culture and the triumph of the spectacle. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to globalization (pp. 59–82). Blackwell.
• McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
• Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori method. Schocken Books. (Original work published 1912)
• Moran, J. (2005). Reading the everyday. Routledge.
• Ofcom. (2020). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report 2020.
• Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.
• Postman, N. (1970). The reformed English curriculum. In A. C. Eurich (Ed.), High school 1980: The shape of the future in American secondary education (pp. 160–168). Pitman Publishing Corporation.
• Postman, N. (1982). The disappearance of childhood. Delacorte Press.
• Postman, N. (1985). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Viking Penguin.
• Postman, N. (1988). Conscientious objections: Stirring up trouble about language, technology, and education. Knopf.
• Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage Books.
• Postman, N. (1995). The end of education: Redefining the value of school. Alfred A. Knopf.
• Postman, N. (1999). Building a bridge to the 18th century: How the past can improve our future. Knopf.
• Smith, M. R., & Marx, L. (Eds.). (1994). Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism. MIT Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Zaretsky, R. (2024). “Neil Postman’s Media Critique in a Fragmented World.” The Forward. This article connects Postman’s ideas to modern digital media and their impact on knowledge and behaviour【15†source】.
• “Amusing Ourselves to Death – A Review.” Ethics and Culture. Explores Postman’s warnings about media’s epistemological influence and the relevance of his critique in today’s media environment【16†source】.
• Levin, A. (1995). “Technological Society Through Postman’s Eyes.” The American Scholar. Reflects on Postman’s work and its critique of the technological age【13†source】【14†source】.

Suggested Books

• Strate, L. (2006). Echoes and Reflections: On Media Ecology as a Field of Study.
  • Outline: Explores media ecology theories, heavily influenced by Neil Postman, and discusses their implications for education, communication, and culture.
• McChesney, R. W. (2014). Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy.
  • Outline: Offers a critical examination of digital media’s political and cultural effects, aligning with some of Postman’s concerns.
• Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the Pain of Others.
  • Outline: Explores the visual culture and ethics of media representation, complementing Postman’s analysis of media and communication.

Recommended Websites

• Media Ecology Association (media-ecology.org)
  • Overview: Provides resources, conference details, and publications focusing on media ecology, a field strongly associated with Postman.
• The Forward (forward.com)
  • Overview: Features analyses and contemporary reflections on media and culture, including articles on Postman’s work.
• Ethics and Culture Blog (ethicsandculture.com)
  • Overview: Includes reviews and discussions about ethical implications in media and culture, referencing Postman’s theories.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

To cite this article use:

Early Years TV Neil Postman’s Theory on Media, Childhood, and Education. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/neil-postmans-media-theory-childhood-education (Accessed: 17 April 2025).

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile