Decision Making Psychology: How to Make Better Choices

Psychologists estimate we make thousands of decisions daily, yet research shows most people dramatically underestimate their actual decision-making frequency by over 1,400%.

Introduction

Every day, you make approximately 35,000 decisions – from what to wear in the morning to major life choices that shape your future. Yet despite this constant practice, many people struggle with decision-making, often falling into predictable mental traps that lead to poor outcomes. The good news? The psychology of decision-making is well-understood, and with the right knowledge and tools, anyone can dramatically improve their choice-making abilities.

Understanding cognitive biases and the psychological forces that drive our decisions isn’t just academic curiosity – it’s practical wisdom that can transform your personal and professional life. From choosing a career path to deciding what to have for lunch, the same mental processes and biases influence every choice you make. This comprehensive guide explores the fascinating world of decision psychology, providing you with evidence-based frameworks and strategies to make better choices consistently.

Rather than promising perfect decision-making (which is impossible), this article will help you understand how your mind works when facing choices, recognize common pitfalls, and develop systematic approaches that improve your decision quality over time. You’ll discover why intelligent people sometimes make poor decisions, learn proven frameworks used by successful leaders, and develop your own personalized decision-making system. Whether you’re paralyzed by analysis or prone to impulsive choices, understanding the fundamental human needs that drive your decisions will give you powerful insights into your own choice-making patterns.

The Science Behind How We Make Decisions

To make better decisions, you first need to understand how your brain actually processes choices. Modern neuroscience and psychology have revealed that decision-making isn’t the purely rational process we often assume it to be – instead, it’s a complex interplay between different brain systems, each with its own strengths and weaknesses.

System 1 vs System 2 Thinking

Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman revolutionized our understanding of decision-making through his dual-process theory, which describes two distinct modes of thinking that govern our choices (Kahneman, 2011).

System 1 operates automatically and intuitively, making rapid decisions based on pattern recognition, emotions, and mental shortcuts called heuristics. This system evolved to help our ancestors make quick survival decisions – like instantly recognizing a threat or identifying something as food. System 1 thinking requires minimal mental effort and can process enormous amounts of information almost instantaneously.

System 2 represents our slower, more deliberate analytical thinking. This system engages when we consciously analyze options, weigh pros and cons, and make carefully reasoned decisions. System 2 thinking requires significant mental energy and attention, which is why it’s mentally exhausting to make many complex decisions in succession.

Understanding this distinction is crucial because most poor decisions happen when we rely on System 1 thinking in situations that require System 2 analysis, or when we exhaust our System 2 capacity and default to mental shortcuts inappropriately.

The Neuroscience of Choice

Modern brain imaging technology has revealed the specific neural networks involved in decision-making, providing insights into why we sometimes make choices that seem illogical from the outside. The decision-making process involves three key brain regions working together:

The prefrontal cortex serves as your brain’s CEO, responsible for weighing options, considering consequences, and making reasoned judgments. This region doesn’t fully mature until your mid-twenties, which explains why teenagers and young adults are more prone to impulsive decision-making.

The limbic system, particularly the amygdala, processes emotions and triggers fight-or-flight responses. While emotions provide valuable information about our preferences and values, they can also hijack rational decision-making when we’re stressed, fearful, or excited.

The anterior cingulate cortex acts as a conflict monitor, detecting when different brain regions are sending contradictory signals. This region becomes active when you’re torn between options or when logic and emotion point in different directions.

Research from MIT has shown that when these brain regions are in conflict, decision quality often suffers (Shenhav et al., 2013). This explains why decisions feel harder when you’re emotionally invested or when options seem equally appealing. Understanding this neural competition can help you recognize when to slow down and engage more systematic decision-making processes.

Common Decision-Making Pitfalls and Cognitive Biases

Even the smartest, most well-intentioned people fall into predictable mental traps when making decisions. These cognitive biases aren’t character flaws – they’re systematic patterns in how human brains process information that served our ancestors well but can lead us astray in modern contexts.

The Big 6 Biases That Sabotage Decisions

Understanding these major biases can dramatically improve your decision-making by helping you recognize when your thinking might be compromised:

Confirmation Bias leads us to seek information that supports our existing beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence. When choosing between job opportunities, you might focus only on positive aspects of your preferred option while overlooking its drawbacks, or dismiss negative feedback about a choice you’ve already made emotionally.

Anchoring Bias causes us to rely too heavily on the first piece of information encountered when making decisions. Real estate agents exploit this bias by showing expensive properties first, making subsequent options seem more reasonable by comparison. In salary negotiations, the first number mentioned strongly influences the final agreement.

Loss Aversion makes us feel potential losses roughly twice as strongly as equivalent gains. This bias explains why people often stick with unsatisfying situations rather than risk change, or why investors hold losing stocks too long while selling winners too quickly.

Availability Heuristic causes us to judge the likelihood of events based on how easily we can remember examples. After seeing news about airplane crashes, people overestimate flying risks while underestimating more common dangers like driving accidents.

Sunk Cost Fallacy traps us into continuing failed courses of action because we’ve already invested time, money, or effort. This bias keeps people in unfulfilling relationships, dead-end jobs, or failing business ventures longer than rational analysis would suggest.

Overconfidence Bias leads us to overestimate our own knowledge, abilities, and chances of success. Studies consistently show that most people rate themselves as above-average drivers, investors, and decision-makers – a statistical impossibility that reveals how this bias distorts self-perception.

For a deeper understanding of how these and other biases affect your daily decisions, explore our comprehensive cognitive biases guide which covers 25 different thinking errors and practical strategies for overcoming them.

Why Smart People Make Poor Decisions

Intelligence and good decision-making aren’t as closely linked as you might expect. Highly intelligent people often make poor choices for several psychological reasons:

Expertise can create blind spots. When people become expert in one area, they may overestimate their competence in unrelated domains. A brilliant engineer might make poor investment decisions, or a successful entrepreneur might struggle with relationship choices, because expertise in one area creates false confidence in others.

Analysis paralysis affects intelligent people disproportionately. Smart individuals often overthink decisions, gathering excessive information and considering too many options. Research shows that having too many choices can decrease satisfaction with whatever decision is ultimately made (Schwartz, 2004).

Emotional hijacking affects everyone equally. When stress, fear, anger, or excitement flood the brain, even the most analytical people default to emotional decision-making. A person with a PhD in psychology might still make impulsive purchases when stressed or angry.

Time pressure forces everyone into mental shortcuts. Under deadline pressure, intelligent people are just as likely to rely on biases and heuristics as anyone else. The pressure to decide quickly overwhelms careful analysis, regardless of intellectual capacity.

Proven Frameworks for Better Decision Making

While understanding biases helps you avoid mental traps, having systematic frameworks gives you positive tools for improving decision quality. These evidence-based approaches have been tested in business, psychology, and real-world applications.

The WRAP Method

Developed by Chip Heath and Dan Heath based on extensive research into decision-making, the WRAP method provides a structured approach to important choices (Heath & Heath, 2013). This framework is particularly valuable for complex decisions with significant consequences.

Widen Your Options challenges the tendency to consider only obvious alternatives. Most people fall into “whether or not” thinking – whether or not to take a job, whether or not to make a purchase – when they should be exploring multiple possibilities. Ask yourself: “What else could I do?” or “How would I advise a friend in this situation?” Generate at least three viable options before evaluating any of them.

Reality-Test Your Assumptions combats confirmation bias by forcing you to test your beliefs about each option. Conduct small experiments when possible – like taking a trial shift at a potential job or test-driving a car for several days. Seek out people who have chosen differently and understand their reasoning. Ask yourself: “What would have to be true for this option to work well?”

Attain Distance Before Deciding helps overcome emotional decision-making by creating psychological space. Use the 10-10-10 rule: How will you feel about this decision in 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years? Imagine advising a friend facing the same choice. Consider what someone you respect would do in this situation.

Prepare to Be Wrong acknowledges that even good decisions can have poor outcomes due to factors beyond your control. Set “tripwires” – predetermined signals that indicate when you should reconsider or change course. Plan for likely obstacles and develop contingency strategies. Ask yourself: “What would make me regret this decision, and how can I prepare for those scenarios?”

The WRAP method works because it systematically addresses the most common decision-making failures while remaining practical enough to use regularly. For developing the systematic thinking skills that support better decision-making, consider exploring executive function development, which covers the mental abilities underlying effective planning and problem-solving.

The 10-10-10 Rule for Perspective

Developed by journalist Suzy Welch, the 10-10-10 rule provides a simple tool for gaining emotional distance from decisions. By considering how you’ll feel about a choice at three different time horizons, you can better balance short-term emotions with long-term consequences.

10 Minutes: How will you feel immediately after making this decision? This captures your emotional state and immediate satisfaction or regret. Some decisions that feel good in the moment create problems later.

10 Months: How will you feel about this choice when the initial emotions have settled but you’re still living with the consequences? This timeframe often reveals the practical implications of your decision.

10 Years: How will you feel about this decision when you have significant life perspective? This long-term view often reveals what truly matters and helps distinguish between momentary concerns and lasting impact.

For example, when considering whether to quit a frustrating job: In 10 minutes, you might feel relief and excitement. In 10 months, you might feel proud of taking control or worried about financial stability. In 10 years, you might feel grateful for the courage to pursue better opportunities or regretful about lost career progression.

This framework is particularly valuable for decisions involving trade-offs between present and future benefits, such as education choices, relationship decisions, or career moves.

Values-Based Decision Making

Your core values act as a compass for decision-making, helping you choose options that align with what matters most to you. However, many people have never clearly identified their values or don’t know how to apply them practically to choices.

Identifying Your Core Values requires honest self-reflection about what you find most meaningful and motivating. Consider peak experiences in your life – moments when you felt most fulfilled and authentic. What values were you expressing during those times? Common core values include family, achievement, creativity, security, adventure, service to others, and personal growth.

Understanding the six human needs that drive behavior – certainty, variety, significance, connection, growth, and contribution – can help you identify which values are most important to you and how they influence your decision-making patterns.

Using Values as Decision Filters involves evaluating each option against your core values. Create a simple scoring system where you rate how well each alternative aligns with your most important values. The option with the highest overall alignment score often represents the best choice for your long-term satisfaction and authenticity.

When Values Conflict – which happens frequently in complex decisions – you need strategies for prioritization. Consider which values are non-negotiable versus those where you can accept some compromise. Think about which values are most important during your current life stage. A person early in their career might prioritize growth and achievement, while someone with young children might emphasize security and family connection.

The Pre-Mortem Technique

Developed by psychologist Gary Klein, the pre-mortem technique helps you anticipate potential problems before making a decision. Unlike a post-mortem, which analyzes what went wrong after failure, a pre-mortem imagines failure before it happens.

The Process involves assuming your decision has led to poor outcomes and working backward to identify what could have gone wrong. Gather input from others when possible – different perspectives reveal blind spots you might miss. Generate multiple failure scenarios, not just the most obvious ones.

Identifying Potential Problems helps you make more informed decisions by understanding risks before committing. Some problems can be prevented through better planning. Others might be unavoidable but can be prepared for with contingency plans.

Building Contingency Plans for likely obstacles increases your confidence and improves outcomes when problems do arise. Having backup plans reduces anxiety and helps you move forward decisively while remaining adaptable when circumstances change.

Managing Emotions in Decision Making

Emotions play a complex role in decision-making – they provide valuable information about your preferences and values, but they can also cloud judgment and lead to poor choices. Learning to work with your emotions rather than against them is essential for consistently good decision-making.

Understanding Decision Fatigue

Your brain’s capacity for decision-making is limited and depletes throughout the day, much like a muscle that becomes tired with overuse. This phenomenon, called decision fatigue, helps explain why you might make poor choices later in the day even when you’re capable of excellent decisions in the morning.

Why Willpower Depletes occurs because every decision, no matter how small, uses some of your mental energy. Studies of judges show that they’re more likely to grant parole in the morning than in the afternoon, regardless of case merits (Danziger et al., 2011). By evening, even simple choices like what to watch on television can feel overwhelming.

The Paradox of Choice compounds decision fatigue – having too many options actually makes decisions harder, not easier. While some choice is essential for well-being, research consistently shows that excessive options lead to decreased satisfaction, increased regret, and avoidance of decision-making altogether.

Strategies for Preserving Mental Energy include reducing unnecessary decisions through routines and systems. Many successful people wear similar clothes daily to avoid fashion decisions. Batch similar decisions together when your energy is high. Make important decisions early in the day when your mental resources are fresh. Use simple decision rules for routine choices – like always ordering the same coffee or having standard responses to common requests.

For foundational understanding of how mental regulation develops and can be strengthened, explore our guide to self-regulation in the early years, which provides insights into building the emotional control systems that support better decision-making throughout life.

Fear, Anxiety, and Analysis Paralysis

Fear and anxiety often masquerade as careful analysis, keeping you stuck in endless information-gathering when action is needed. Understanding when fear helps versus hurts decision quality is crucial for moving forward effectively.

When Fear Helps decision quality by highlighting genuine risks that deserve attention. Healthy fear motivates you to gather necessary information, seek advice from experts, and plan carefully for important decisions. Fear becomes problematic when it prevents action entirely or when it’s disproportionate to actual risks.

Breaking the Perfectionism Trap requires accepting that no decision will be perfect and that gathering more information often provides diminishing returns. Research shows that satisficing – choosing the first option that meets your criteria rather than finding the absolute best option – often leads to greater satisfaction than maximizing (Schwartz, 2004).

Setting “Good Enough” Standards helps you move forward when perfect information isn’t available. Define minimum acceptable criteria for your decision and commit to choosing the first option that meets those standards. This approach reduces overthinking while still ensuring your choice meets your needs.

APA research on anxiety and decision-making reveals that moderate anxiety can actually improve decision quality by increasing attention to details and potential problems, but high anxiety impairs judgment and leads to avoidance (American Psychological Association, 2019).

Using Emotions as Data

Rather than viewing emotions as obstacles to rational decision-making, learn to treat them as valuable information about your preferences, values, and the likely outcomes of different choices.

Gut Feelings vs Emotional Reactions represent different types of emotional information. Gut feelings often reflect rapid, unconscious processing of complex information – your intuition about a person might be picking up on subtle behavioral cues your conscious mind hasn’t noticed. Emotional reactions are more surface-level responses to immediate circumstances.

When to Trust Your Intuition depends on your expertise in the decision domain. Research shows that experts’ intuitive judgments are often remarkably accurate within their area of competence (Klein, 1998). A experienced teacher’s gut feeling about a student’s needs or a seasoned investor’s market instincts often contain valuable information.

Integrating Emotion and Logic involves using emotions to inform your analysis rather than replace it. Pay attention to which options generate excitement, dread, relief, or anxiety. These emotional responses often reveal preferences and concerns that logical analysis might miss. Use emotions as starting points for investigation rather than endpoints for decisions.

Decision Making in Different Contexts

The optimal decision-making approach varies significantly depending on the context, stakes, and type of choice you’re facing. Understanding these differences helps you match your decision-making effort to the situation’s requirements.

Personal Life Decisions

Personal decisions often involve complex trade-offs between competing values and goals, making them some of the most challenging choices you’ll face. Unlike business decisions with clear metrics, personal choices require balancing factors like happiness, security, relationships, and meaning.

Career Changes and Life Transitions typically involve uncertainty about future satisfaction and success. Use the WRAP method to explore multiple options rather than just staying versus leaving. Consider conducting informational interviews with people in potential career paths. Test career options through side projects, volunteering, or short-term assignments when possible.

Relationship Decisions are particularly complex because they involve another person’s needs and preferences alongside your own. Pay attention to your emotional responses during different interactions – they often reveal compatibility issues logic might miss. Consider long-term patterns rather than isolated incidents when evaluating relationship health.

Financial Choices benefit from systematic analysis but are often driven by emotional factors like fear, status desires, or immediate gratification. Separate needs from wants when making spending decisions. Consider the opportunity cost of major purchases – what else could you do with that money? Use the 10-10-10 rule for significant financial decisions.

Professional and Business Decisions

Business contexts often provide clearer success metrics than personal decisions, but they involve stakeholder management and organizational dynamics that add complexity.

Team Decision-Making Dynamics require balancing individual expertise with group consensus. Research shows that diverse teams make better decisions than homogeneous ones, but only when they have structured processes for incorporating different perspectives (Page, 2007). Use devil’s advocate approaches to surface potential problems. Ensure quiet team members have opportunities to contribute their perspectives.

Risk Assessment in Business involves quantifying uncertainties when possible while acknowledging that some factors can’t be predicted. Use scenario planning to prepare for multiple potential outcomes. Consider both upside potential and downside protection when evaluating options.

Stakeholder Considerations complicate business decisions because different groups have competing interests. Map all affected stakeholders and their priorities before making major decisions. Consider how to communicate decisions effectively to build support and minimize resistance.

For workplace applications of systematic thinking and planning skills, executive function development provides strategies for managing complex professional responsibilities effectively.

High-Stakes vs Low-Stakes Decisions

Matching your decision-making effort to the stakes involved is crucial for efficiency and effectiveness. Spending extensive time on trivial choices wastes mental energy, while rushing important decisions often leads to poor outcomes.

Reversible vs Irreversible Choices require different approaches. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos distinguishes between “one-way door” decisions that are difficult to reverse and “two-way door” decisions that can be easily changed. Use quick decision-making for reversible choices and more systematic approaches for irreversible ones.

Appropriate Effort Allocation means spending your decision-making energy where it matters most. Develop standard responses for routine decisions. Use simple heuristics for low-stakes choices – like always choosing the healthiest restaurant option or buying the mid-priced version of routine purchases.

When to Use Shortcuts vs Deep Analysis depends on the decision’s importance, your expertise in the domain, and available time. Trust experienced intuition for familiar decisions within your expertise. Use systematic analysis for unfamiliar, high-stakes choices with significant consequences.

Building Your Personal Decision-Making System

Consistently good decision-making requires more than understanding individual frameworks – it requires developing your own systematic approach that fits your personality, lifestyle, and typical decision challenges.

Creating Decision Criteria Templates

Having pre-established criteria for common decision types eliminates the need to start from scratch each time while ensuring you consider important factors consistently.

Customizable Decision Matrices help you evaluate options systematically by listing relevant criteria and rating each option’s performance. Weight criteria based on their importance to you. This approach is particularly valuable for complex decisions with multiple factors to consider.

Weighting Factors That Matter to You requires honest assessment of your priorities. Some people prioritize financial security above all else, while others value adventure and new experiences. Neither approach is right or wrong, but being clear about your priorities improves decision consistency and satisfaction.

Sample decision matrix for evaluating job opportunities

Practice Strategies for Improvement

Like any skill, decision-making improves with deliberate practice and reflection on your patterns and outcomes.

Daily Decision Journaling involves tracking important decisions and their outcomes over time. Note what information you considered, which factors influenced you most, and how you felt about the choice. After sufficient time has passed, evaluate whether the decision achieved your intended outcomes and what you might do differently.

Reviewing Past Decisions for Patterns helps you identify personal biases and recurring challenges. Do you consistently underestimate time requirements? Do you avoid decisions that involve potential conflict? Are you too optimistic or pessimistic about outcomes? Understanding your patterns enables targeted improvement.

Seeking Feedback on Decision Quality from trusted friends, mentors, or colleagues provides outside perspective on your decision-making process. Ask them to evaluate your reasoning rather than just agreeing or disagreeing with your conclusions. People who know you well can often spot blind spots you miss.

When to Seek Outside Perspective

Recognizing when you need help with decisions is itself an important decision-making skill. Some situations benefit greatly from external input, while others are best handled independently.

Red Flags for Getting Help include decisions that trigger strong emotional reactions, choices outside your area of expertise, and situations where you find yourself going in circles without reaching conclusions. High-stakes irreversible decisions also warrant outside perspective, even if you’re confident in your analysis.

Types of Advisors for Different Decisions should match the decision type and your specific needs. Financial advisors for investment decisions, career counselors for professional transitions, therapists for relationship or mental health concerns, and trusted friends for personal decisions where you need emotional support and perspective.

Avoiding Groupthink While Getting Input requires seeking diverse perspectives rather than just confirmation of your existing inclinations. Ask advisors to challenge your assumptions and point out potential problems. Consider the motivations and biases of people giving advice – friends might prioritize your happiness over objective success metrics.

Advanced Decision-Making Concepts

Once you’ve mastered basic frameworks and built personal systems, these advanced concepts can further refine your decision-making capabilities for complex, uncertain, or high-stakes situations.

Probability Thinking and Uncertainty

Most important decisions involve uncertainty about outcomes, making probability thinking essential for realistic evaluation of options. Rather than seeking certainty that doesn’t exist, learn to work effectively with incomplete information.

Understanding Base Rates helps calibrate your expectations about likely outcomes. If 90% of new businesses fail within five years, factor that base rate into your entrepreneurial decision-making while also considering what might make your situation different. Base rates provide realistic starting points for probability estimates.

Dealing with Incomplete Information is inevitable in most important decisions. Focus on gathering information that would most change your decision rather than trying to eliminate all uncertainty. Set deadlines for information gathering to avoid analysis paralysis. Accept that some uncertainty is irreducible and plan accordingly.

Harvard Business School research on decision-making under uncertainty shows that successful leaders develop comfort with ambiguity while maintaining systematic approaches to evaluation (Eisenhardt & Zbaracki, 1992). They gather enough information to make informed decisions without attempting to eliminate all risk.

Meta-Decision Making

Meta-decision making involves deciding how to decide – choosing which framework, process, or level of analysis to apply to different situations.

Deciding How to Decide requires matching your approach to the decision’s characteristics. Quick, intuitive decisions work well for routine choices within your expertise. Systematic frameworks like WRAP are better for complex, high-stakes decisions with multiple stakeholders. Simple rules work well for recurring decisions with clear criteria.

When to Use Different Frameworks depends on time available, decision importance, your emotional state, and the complexity of trade-offs involved. Use values-based approaches when the decision involves fundamental life direction. Apply probability thinking when outcomes are uncertain. Employ stakeholder analysis when decisions affect multiple people.

Adapting Your Approach to the Situation means remaining flexible in your methods while maintaining systematic thinking. Emergency situations might require rapid intuitive decisions, while major life changes warrant extensive analysis. The key is conscious choice about your decision-making process rather than defaulting to the same approach regardless of context.

Conclusion

Understanding decision-making psychology transforms how you approach life’s choices, from daily routines to major life transitions. The frameworks and strategies outlined in this guide provide systematic approaches to improving your decision quality while working with, rather than against, your brain’s natural tendencies.

The key to better decision-making isn’t perfection – it’s developing awareness of your cognitive patterns and having reliable tools for important choices. Whether you implement the WRAP method for complex decisions, use values-based filtering for life direction, or simply recognize when cognitive biases might be influencing your thinking, small improvements in decision-making compound over time to create significant positive changes.

Start by choosing one framework that resonates with your current challenges and practice applying it consistently. Build your decision-making skills gradually, just as you would develop any other capability. Remember that even experts make poor decisions sometimes – what matters is learning from outcomes and continuously refining your approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the 5 steps to effective decision-making?

The five essential steps are: 1) Clearly define the decision and desired outcome, 2) Gather relevant information without falling into analysis paralysis, 3) Generate multiple options rather than just “yes or no” thinking, 4) Evaluate alternatives using systematic criteria aligned with your values, and 5) Implement your choice while remaining open to course corrections based on new information.

How do I train myself to make better decisions?

Start by keeping a decision journal to track important choices and their outcomes over time. Practice using structured frameworks like the WRAP method for significant decisions. Develop awareness of your personal cognitive biases through self-reflection and feedback from trusted friends. Make important decisions early in the day when your mental energy is highest, and create standard responses for routine choices to preserve mental capacity.

How to make better decisions when feeling overwhelmed?

When overwhelmed, first reduce decision fatigue by postponing non-essential choices and using simple rules for routine decisions. Break complex decisions into smaller components you can handle one at a time. Use the 10-10-10 rule to gain emotional distance from immediate stress. Seek input from trusted advisors who can provide perspective when your emotions are running high.

What is an example of good decision-making skills?

Good decision-making involves systematically evaluating a job offer by listing pros and cons, researching company culture and growth potential, considering alignment with personal values and career goals, seeking advice from mentors, and using frameworks like the 10-10-10 rule to balance short-term and long-term implications before making a well-informed choice.

How do cognitive biases affect decision-making?

Cognitive biases create systematic errors in thinking that can lead to poor choices. For example, confirmation bias makes us seek information that supports what we already believe, while loss aversion causes us to stick with unsatisfying situations rather than risk change. Understanding these biases helps you recognize when they might be influencing your thinking and take steps to counteract their effects.

What’s the difference between good and bad decision-making?

Good decision-making involves systematic evaluation of options, consideration of long-term consequences, awareness of emotional influences, and alignment with personal values. Bad decision-making typically involves rushing to judgment, ignoring relevant information, being overly influenced by emotions or biases, and failing to consider how choices align with broader goals and values.

How can I overcome analysis paralysis?

Set specific deadlines for decision-making and stick to them. Focus on gathering information that would most change your decision rather than trying to eliminate all uncertainty. Use “good enough” standards instead of seeking perfect solutions. Recognize that making no decision is itself a decision with consequences, often worse than making an imperfect choice and adjusting course later.

When should I trust my gut instincts?

Trust your gut instincts when making decisions within your area of expertise, when you have relevant experience with similar situations, or when logical analysis points to multiple equally viable options. However, be cautious about gut feelings when you’re emotionally charged, dealing with unfamiliar situations, or when the stakes are particularly high and systematic analysis is possible.

References

American Psychological Association. (2019). Anxiety and decision-making: Research findings on cognitive performance. American Psychologist, 74(3), 315-328.

Conkbayir, M. (2017). Early childhood and neuroscience: Theory, research and implications for practice. Bloomsbury Academic.

Corpus, J. H., & Lepper, M. R. (2007). The effects of person versus performance praise on children’s motivation: Gender and age as moderating factors. Educational Psychology, 27(4), 487-508.

Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889-6892.

Early Education. (2024). Development matters: Non-statutory curriculum guidance for the early years foundation stage. Early Education.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17-37.

Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1-to 3-year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84(5), 1526-1541.

Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2013). Decisive: How to make better choices in life and work. Crown Business.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. MIT Press.

Lieberman, A. F. (2017). The emotional life of the toddler. Free Press.

Marchette, L. (2024). Understanding co-regulation in child development. Harvard Medical School Health Blog. Retrieved from Harvard Health Publishing.

Maté, G. (2019). When the body says no: Exploring the stress-disease connection. Wiley.

Morelen, D., Shaffer, A., & Suveg, C. (2016). Maternal emotion regulation links to emotion parenting and child emotion regulation. Journal of Family Issues, 37(13), 1891-1916.

Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press.

Pascal, C., Bertram, T., Cullinane, A., & Holt-White, E. (2019). Reception baseline assessment: Research report. Department for Education.

Reframing Autism. (2023). Co-regulation and emotional support strategies. Autism Research and Practice Journal, 15(2), 45-62.

Robbins, T. (2020). Unshakeable: Your financial freedom playbook. Simon & Schuster.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

Schore, A. N. (2015). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Routledge.

Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Harper Perennial.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333-335.

Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2013). The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79(2), 217-240.

Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2020). The power of showing up: How parental presence shapes who our kids become and how their brains get wired. Bantam.

Tronick, E., & Beeghly, M. (2011). Infants’ meaning‐making and the development of mental health problems. American Psychologist, 66(2), 107-119.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451-482.
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale Law Journal, 117(6), 1645-1670.
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665.

Suggested Books

• Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. HarperCollins.
  • Explores how psychological factors systematically influence decision-making, with practical experiments and real-world applications for improving choices in business and personal life.
• Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
  • Comprehensive academic exploration of cognitive biases and mental shortcuts, providing deep understanding of how these psychological patterns affect judgment and decision-making across various domains.
• Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. Crown Publishers.
  • Examines how some people consistently make accurate predictions about future events, offering practical techniques for improving judgment and decision-making under uncertainty.

Recommended Websites

• Center for Applied Rationality (CFAR) – Evidence-based workshops and resources for improving reasoning and decision-making skills.
  • Offers research-backed techniques for overcoming cognitive biases, workshops on systematic thinking, and practical tools for better judgment in personal and professional contexts.
• Behavioral Economics Guide – Comprehensive resource on behavioral insights and decision science research.
  • Features academic research summaries, practical applications of behavioral economics, case studies from business and policy, and tools for understanding psychological influences on choice.
• Decision Science News – Latest research and insights from the academic decision science community.
  • Provides summaries of cutting-edge research in judgment and decision-making, interviews with leading researchers, and practical applications of decision science findings.

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile

To cite this article please use:

Early Years TV Decision Making Psychology: How to Make Better Choices. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/improve-decision-making-psychology/ (Accessed: 12 October 2025).