Id, Ego & Superego: Definition & Examples

Key Takeaways

• The Id: The primitive, unconscious component of personality present from birth, driven by the pleasure principle and focused on immediate gratification.
• The Ego: The rational mediator that develops during early childhood, operating on the reality principle to balance the id’s demands with external constraints through secondary process thinking and defence mechanisms.
• The Superego: The moral component emerging around ages 3-5, incorporating internalised parental and societal standards through the conscience and ego-ideal.
• Dynamic interactions: Psychological health depends on balanced interactions between these components, with imbalances potentially leading to various psychological difficulties including impulsivity, excessive guilt, or poor reality testing.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

Introduction

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) stands as one of the most influential figures in the history of psychology, despite ongoing debates about his methods and conclusions. As the founder of psychoanalysis, Freud developed theories that fundamentally altered our understanding of human behaviour, motivation, and mental processes (Gay, 1998). His work on the unconscious mind introduced concepts that continue to permeate modern psychological thought, clinical practice, and popular culture.

Central to Freud’s theoretical framework is his structural model of personality, which divides the psyche into three distinct yet interacting components: the id, ego, and superego. Introduced in his 1923 text “The Ego and the Id,” this tripartite model replaced his earlier topographical theory of the conscious and unconscious mind, offering a more nuanced understanding of human personality (Freud, 1923). Read our in-depth Article on Freud here.

Understanding these three elements of personality is essential for students of psychology for several compelling reasons:

• The model provides a foundational framework for understanding human behaviour and motivation
• It introduces key concepts about conscious and unconscious processes that influence decision-making
• It establishes a vocabulary for discussing internal psychological conflicts
• It underpins many subsequent psychological theories and therapeutic approaches

While contemporary psychology has moved beyond many of Freud’s specific claims, his structural model continues to offer valuable insights into the complexities of human personality. This article examines each component of Freud’s model—the id, ego, and superego—exploring their characteristics, development, interactions, and relevance to modern psychological understanding. By unpacking these concepts, students will gain both historical context for psychological theory and practical frameworks for analysing human behaviour in various contexts.

Historical Context

Freud’s structural model of personality emerged through decades of clinical observation and theoretical refinement, representing a significant evolution in his thinking about the human mind. Prior to developing his tripartite model, Freud had worked extensively with his topographical theory, which conceptualised the mind as having three regions: the conscious, preconscious, and unconscious (Boag, 2014). This earlier model, while groundbreaking in its emphasis on unconscious processes, ultimately proved insufficient to explain the complexities Freud observed in his patients.

The shift from the topographical to the structural model occurred gradually as Freud grappled with clinical phenomena that his initial theory could not adequately address. Particularly influential was his work on repression and his growing recognition that even the ego—often considered the seat of rationality—operated partly on an unconscious level (Gay, 1998). This revelation challenged the neat divisions of his topographical model and necessitated a more dynamic framework.

In 1923, Freud formally introduced his structural model in “The Ego and the Id,” a seminal text that reconfigured psychological understanding of personality. This publication represented a critical milestone in psychoanalytic theory:

• It established the id, ego, and superego as distinct yet interconnected systems
• It positioned these components as hypothetical constructs rather than physical entities
• It emphasised the dynamic interplay between conscious and unconscious processes
• It introduced the concept of psychic energy being distributed among these three elements

The historical reception of Freud’s structural model was mixed but significant. Within psychoanalytic circles, it was rapidly adopted and expanded upon, becoming a cornerstone of psychoanalytic practice and theory. Beyond these circles, the concepts faced both fascination and scepticism. As Mitchell and Black (1995) note, the model profoundly influenced fields beyond psychology, including anthropology, sociology, and literary criticism.

By the mid-20th century, the id, ego, and superego had become cultural touchstones, referenced in literature, film, and everyday discourse about human behaviour. While subsequent psychological paradigms—behaviorism, humanistic psychology, and cognitive science—often positioned themselves in opposition to Freudian concepts, the structural model’s influence persisted through neo-Freudian adaptations and continues to inform contemporary understanding of personality development and internal conflict (Solms, 2018).

The Three Components: Definitions and Core Concepts

Freud’s structural model conceptualises the human psyche as comprised of three distinct yet interdependent systems: the id, ego, and superego. These systems interact continuously to influence behaviour, thought, and emotion, often operating beneath conscious awareness. Understanding each component’s unique characteristics, development, and function provides essential insight into the dynamics of personality.

The Id

At the most fundamental level of personality lies the id, which Freud characterised as “a cauldron of seething excitations” (Freud, 1923). This primal component forms the foundation of the psyche and serves as the repository for our most basic biological urges and instinctual drives.

Definition and Primary Characteristics

The id represents the most primitive aspect of personality, operating entirely within the unconscious mind. It functions as the psychological representation of biological needs and drives, demanding immediate satisfaction without consideration for external reality or social constraints. Key characteristics include:

• Entirely unconscious, with no connection to external reality
• Present from birth as the original component of personality
• Amoral, lacking any sense of right or wrong
• Impulsive and driven by immediate need satisfaction
• Devoid of organisation, logic, or temporal awareness

As Freud (1920) explained, the id knows no judgement of value, no good and evil, and no morality—only the imperative of gratification. Its demands are simple yet powerful: satisfy hunger, quench thirst, seek pleasure, avoid pain, express aggression when threatened, and pursue sexual gratification.

The Pleasure Principle

The id operates according to what Freud termed the “pleasure principle”—the driving force that seeks immediate gratification of needs and avoidance of discomfort. This principle reflects the id’s fundamental goal of tension reduction through instinctual discharge.

When needs are unmet, tension increases, producing an uncomfortable psychic state that demands resolution. The id responds to this state by seeking immediate relief, regardless of consequences or contextual appropriateness. When gratification occurs, tension decreases, resulting in the experience of pleasure or satisfaction (Freud, 1920).

This process explains why hunger leads to irritability until food is obtained, why physical discomfort prompts immediate attempts to alleviate it, and why emotional states like anger often seek expression regardless of social context.

Primary Process Thinking

To achieve gratification, the id employs primary process thinking—a primitive, illogical form of cognitive functioning disconnected from reality. This thinking operates through:

• Wish fulfilment through mental imagery
• Disregard for logic, causality, or temporal relationships
• Formation of condensed and displaced representations
• Absence of negation or contradiction

When the id cannot obtain actual satisfaction, it may temporarily reduce tension through forming mental images of the desired object or experience. For instance, a hungry infant might momentarily reduce tension by hallucinating the image of food before crying when this imaginary solution proves insufficient (Freud, 1923).

Primary process thinking appears in dreams, creative imagination, and certain psychopathological states where reality testing is compromised. Its influence also emerges in everyday life when emotions override logical reasoning or when unconscious associations drive seemingly irrational responses.

Development Timeline

The id represents the only component of personality present at birth. As Freud observed, “The core of our being, then, is formed by the obscure id, which has no direct communication with the external world” (Freud, 1933). Newborns operate almost entirely according to id-driven processes, responding to discomfort with undifferentiated distress and seeking immediate relief through reflexive behaviours.

During early development, the id constitutes the entirety of the infant’s psychological experience. Only gradually, through interaction with the environment and caregivers, do the ego and superego develop, emerging from the id as differentiated systems (Freud, 1923).

Importantly, while the influence of the id appears to diminish as development progresses, its fundamental drives remain unchanged throughout life. The id continues to operate as a reservoir of instinctual energy underlying adult behaviour, though its direct expression becomes increasingly modified by the ego and superego.

Relationship to Instincts: Eros and Thanatos

Freud proposed that the id houses two primary classes of instincts that provide its motivational energy: the life instinct (Eros) and the death instinct (Thanatos).

Eros encompasses the range of life-preserving and pleasure-seeking drives, including hunger, thirst, self-preservation, and sexuality. The energy associated with these life instincts, particularly sexual energy, was termed “libido.” This concept extended beyond narrow sexuality to include all creative, constructive, and pleasure-oriented drives (Freud, 1920).

Thanatos, introduced in Freud’s later work, represents destructive and aggressive impulses. Freud theorised that this “death instinct” reflects an unconscious desire to return to an inanimate state, manifesting externally as aggression toward others and internally as self-destructive tendencies (Freud, 1920). While more speculative and controversial than his concept of Eros, the notion of Thanatos attempted to explain observed patterns of aggression, self-sabotage, and repetition of painful experiences.

These dual instincts exist in constant tension within the id, with their relative balance influencing personality and behaviour.

Case Examples and Everyday Manifestations

Despite the ego’s regulation, id impulses regularly emerge in everyday life:

• The immediate irritability experienced when hungry or tired
• Impulsive purchases that satisfy momentary desires without consideration of consequences
• The urge to express anger disproportionate to the triggering situation
• Seeking immediate pleasure through substances despite knowledge of potential harm
• Dream content expressing forbidden wishes in disguised form
• Slips of the tongue revealing underlying unconscious desires

A classic example is the tired toddler who becomes increasingly distraught and unreasonable. In this state, the child exemplifies id dominance—immediate needs override rational considerations, emotional regulation falters, and primary process thinking prevails. Similarly, intoxication often reveals id-driven behaviours as the ego’s regulatory function becomes impaired.

Understanding the id provides insight into many psychological phenomena, from the universal experience of impulses at odds with social norms to clinical conditions involving poor impulse control. It reminds us that beneath our civilised exterior lie primitive forces that continue to influence behaviour in subtle and sometimes profound ways.

The Ego

While the id operates according to instinctual demands regardless of external reality, the ego emerges as the mediating component of personality. Described by Freud (1923) as “that part of the id which has been modified by the direct influence of the external world,” the ego serves as the executive branch of personality, balancing internal desires with external constraints.

Definition and Primary Characteristics

The ego develops as the individual interacts with the environment, gradually forming a structured psychological entity that mediates between the id, superego, and reality. Key characteristics include:

• Operates across conscious, preconscious, and unconscious levels
• Functions as the decision-making component of personality
• Employs logical, rational processes to navigate the world
• Seeks to satisfy id impulses in realistic, socially acceptable ways
• Develops sophisticated defense mechanisms to manage anxiety

Unlike the chaotic id, the ego is organised, coherent, and oriented toward adaptation. It represents what might be considered the “self” in everyday understanding—the aspect of personality that thinks, perceives, plans, and maintains a coherent identity over time.

Freud compared the relationship between the ego and id to that of a rider on horseback: “The ego is like a man on horseback, who has to hold in check the superior strength of the horse” (Freud, 1923). The ego must guide and control the powerful energy of the id while maintaining balance and direction.

The Reality Principle

In contrast to the id’s pleasure principle, the ego operates according to the “reality principle”—the capacity to delay gratification of needs until appropriate opportunities and outlets are available. This principle represents a developmental achievement, allowing the individual to function effectively in the social world.

The reality principle does not oppose pleasure but rather postpones it, recognising that direct or immediate satisfaction may have negative consequences. Through this principle, the ego:

• Assesses the actual situation rather than relying on wish-based perceptions
• Evaluates potential consequences of actions before proceeding
• Develops plans for obtaining satisfaction in acceptable ways
• Tolerates necessary frustration when gratification must be delayed
• Makes compromises when competing interests must be balanced

For example, a hungry student might postpone eating until after an important lecture, recognising that the long-term benefit of education outweighs the immediate discomfort of hunger. Similarly, a professional might redirect aggressive impulses into competitive achievement rather than express them directly in socially inappropriate ways.

Secondary Process Thinking

To implement the reality principle, the ego employs secondary process thinking—a rational, logical form of cognitive functioning that considers objective reality. This mode of thinking contrasts sharply with the id’s primary process and includes:

• Logical connections between thoughts
• Reality testing to distinguish internal from external stimuli
• Consideration of cause and effect relationships
• Recognition of temporal sequences and delays
• Problem-solving strategies that account for real-world constraints

Through secondary process thinking, the ego can formulate plans, anticipate consequences, solve problems, and navigate complex social situations. When an initial approach fails, the ego can revise strategies and try alternative approaches—a capacity entirely lacking in the id.

This form of thinking underpins adaptive functioning in everyday life, from planning a daily schedule to navigating career decisions to maintaining interpersonal relationships.

Development Timeline

The ego begins to emerge during the first year of life as the infant encounters the boundaries of reality. While the id exists from birth, the ego develops gradually through the infant’s interaction with the environment, particularly through experiences with caregivers who both gratify and frustrate needs.

As Freud (1923) noted, the ego develops from the id as the infant learns that immediate gratification is not always possible. Several developmental milestones contribute to ego formation:

• Recognition of self as separate from caregivers (approximately 6-18 months)
• Development of object permanence (understanding objects continue to exist when not perceived)
• Increasing capacity for delayed gratification
• Growing motor control and agency in the environment
• Language acquisition, enabling symbolic representation and thought

The ego continues to develop throughout childhood and adolescence, becoming increasingly sophisticated in its capacity to mediate conflicting demands and adapt to complex social environments. Even in adulthood, the ego continues to evolve as new challenges require new adaptive strategies.

Functions Across Conscious, Preconscious, and Unconscious Mind

Unlike the entirely unconscious id, the ego operates across all levels of consciousness. Freud recognised that ego processes function:

• Consciously (available to immediate awareness)
• Preconsciously (accessible to awareness with attention)
• Unconsciously (operating outside awareness)

Conscious ego functions include deliberate decision-making, attentional focus, and self-awareness. Preconscious functions include readily accessible memories and learned skills that can be brought to awareness when needed. Unconscious ego functions include defense mechanisms and automatic behavioural patterns that operate outside awareness.

This multi-level operation explains why individuals may consciously intend one action while unconsciously implementing another, or why they may be unaware of their true motivations despite careful introspection. It also accounts for the ego’s capacity to regulate anxiety through unconscious defense mechanisms while maintaining conscious functioning.

Case Examples and Everyday Manifestations

The ego’s functioning appears throughout daily life:

• Delaying a desired purchase to save for a more important goal
• Redirecting anger into productive activity rather than direct confrontation
• Planning a multi-step approach to achieving a complex objective
• Maintaining socially appropriate behaviour despite provocative situations
• Employing compromise when faced with conflicting desires or responsibilities
• Adapting strategies when initial approaches prove unsuccessful

Consider a professional who receives unfair criticism from a supervisor. The id might generate an impulse to respond with immediate anger or to quit impulsively. The ego, however, might evaluate the consequences of such actions, consider the value of the job, assess potential alternative approaches, and ultimately decide to address the situation through proper channels while managing emotional reactions appropriately.

Similarly, students preparing for examinations demonstrate ego functioning when they forgo immediate pleasures to study, develop effective learning strategies, manage anxiety productively, and balance competing priorities. The capacity to function effectively in academic settings requires substantial ego development and strength.

Understanding the ego’s role in personality illuminates many aspects of psychological functioning, from everyday decision-making to clinical phenomena involving ego impairment. A strong ego enables resilience, adaptability, and effective navigation of life’s complexities.

The Superego

The third and final component to develop in Freud’s structural model is the superego—the moral dimension of personality. Representing internalised standards, values, and prohibitions, the superego serves as the psychological representative of societal and parental authority.

Definition and Primary Components

The superego functions as the moral branch of personality, evaluating thoughts and actions against internalised standards of right and wrong. Unlike the id’s amoral pursuit of gratification or the ego’s pragmatic negotiation with reality, the superego judges according to idealised principles, often demanding perfection rather than compromise.

Freud conceptualised the superego as having two distinct components:

• The conscience: The aspect that punishes through guilt, incorporating prohibitions and warnings about behaviours deemed wrong or inappropriate
• The ego-ideal: The aspect that rewards through pride, incorporating positive aspirations and models of approved behaviour

Together, these components establish an internal moral framework that both prohibits unacceptable impulses and promotes idealised goals and behaviours.

The superego’s stance often exceeds the actual moral standards of parents or society, becoming more absolute and less nuanced than the original external standards. As Freud observed, “The super-ego applies the strictest moral standard to the helpless ego which is at its mercy; in general it represents the claims of morality, and we realise all at once that our moral sense of guilt is the expression of the tension between the ego and the super-ego” (Freud, 1933).

Development Timeline

The superego develops later than the other structures, typically emerging between ages 3-5 during what Freud termed the “phallic stage” of psychosexual development. This period coincides with what he described as the Oedipus complex (or Electra complex in girls)—a developmental phase involving complex feelings toward parents that ultimately resolves through identification with the same-sex parent.

According to Freud (1923), the superego forms primarily through this process of identification, as the child internalises parental standards, prohibitions, and values. Rather than simply learning rules, the child incorporates the perceived moral authority of parents into their own psychological structure.

Several factors influence superego development:

• Parental discipline styles and consistency
• Explicit moral teachings and modelled behaviour
• Cultural and religious values transmitted through family
• Resolution of the Oedipus/Electra complex
• Identification with same-sex parent and other authority figures

The superego continues to evolve throughout childhood and adolescence as the individual encounters new authority figures, peer standards, and cultural values. Even in adulthood, the superego may undergo modification as the individual reassesses moral positions and incorporates new ethical perspectives.

Morality Principle

While the id operates on the pleasure principle and the ego on the reality principle, the superego functions according to what might be termed the “morality principle”—the imperative to conform to internalised ideals regardless of personal desire or practical considerations.

This principle often manifests as categorical imperatives rather than pragmatic guidelines. The superego tends toward absolute judgments—actions are seen as either right or wrong, good or bad—with little tolerance for the ambiguity or compromise that characterises ego-mediated decisions.

When the individual violates these internalised standards, the superego generates punishment in the form of guilt, shame, and self-criticism. When standards are met or exceeded, the superego provides rewards through feelings of pride, self-respect, and moral superiority.

The intensity of these emotional responses varies considerably among individuals, reflecting differences in superego development. Some develop particularly harsh or punitive superegos, leading to excessive guilt and self-criticism, while others develop more moderate superegos that allow greater flexibility and self-acceptance.

Relationship to Parental/Societal Standards

The superego’s content derives primarily from parental standards and prohibitions, particularly those emphasised during early childhood. As Freud (1923) noted, the superego preserves the character of the parent, continuing their influence within the psyche long after direct parental control has diminished.

However, the superego is not simply a carbon copy of parental values. It often:

• Intensifies standards beyond those actually imposed by parents
• Combines influences from multiple authority figures
• Incorporates cultural ideals from broader social institutions
• Develops according to the child’s interpretations of standards, which may differ from intended messages
• Takes on a quality of absolutism rarely present in actual parental guidance

The relationship between societal norms and the superego explains cultural variations in moral standards while accounting for the universal experience of internal moral judgment. Different societies socialise children according to different values, resulting in culturally varied superego content despite similar structural development.

In modern psychoanalytic thinking, the superego is understood to develop through more complex processes than Freud initially proposed, incorporating multiple identifications beyond the same-sex parent and reflecting broader relational experiences (Mitchell & Black, 1995).

Case Examples and Everyday Manifestations

The superego’s influence appears throughout daily life:

• Experiencing guilt after breaking a promise, even when no one discovers the breach
• Feeling compelled to assist others despite personal inconvenience
• Setting impossibly high standards for personal achievement
• Harshly criticising oneself for minor errors while being more forgiving of others
• Experiencing pride when adhering to personal values despite temptation
• Automatically judging others according to internalised moral standards

Consider a student who discovers an examination answer key accidentally left by a professor. Despite knowing they could use it without discovery, they experience powerful guilt at the mere thought of cheating. Even if the ego recognises the practical advantage of using the key, the superego condemns the action as morally wrong, potentially generating sufficient anxiety to override the temptation.

Similarly, a professional might work late to complete a project despite no external requirement to do so, driven by an internalised standard of thoroughness and responsibility. The satisfaction derived from meeting this internal standard—even at personal cost—reflects the superego’s rewarding function through the ego-ideal.

Understanding the superego illuminates much about moral development, conscientiousness, and the experience of guilt and pride. It also helps explain psychological difficulties involving excessive self-criticism, perfectionism, and moral rigidity, which often reflect superego dynamics.

Interactions Between Components

Understanding Freud’s structural model requires more than examining each component in isolation. The true complexity and explanatory power of the theory emerges from the dynamic interactions between the id, ego, and superego as they compete and collaborate to influence behaviour. As Freud emphasised, these structures are not physically separate entities but rather theoretical constructs that function as an integrated system with ongoing internal negotiations.

Dynamic Relationship and Balance

The id, ego, and superego exist in a state of constant interaction, with each component exerting distinct pressures on the overall system. A well-adjusted personality, according to Freud, reflects a balanced relationship between these forces, with the ego successfully mediating between the competing demands of instinctual drives, moral imperatives, and external reality (Freud, 1923).

This balance is inherently precarious and dynamic rather than static. The relative influence of each component shifts across situations, developmental stages, and psychological states. For instance:

• During periods of heightened emotional arousal, the id may temporarily gain prominence
• When engaged in complex problem-solving, the ego’s rational processes may predominate
• In situations involving moral dilemmas, the superego’s evaluative function may take precedence
• Under stress or fatigue, the ego’s regulatory capacity may diminish, allowing greater expression of id impulses

The quality of these interactions significantly influences psychological functioning. When the components work harmoniously, with the ego effectively balancing competing pressures, the individual experiences psychological equilibrium. When interactions become problematic—such as when the superego becomes excessively punitive or the id’s impulses overwhelm the ego’s regulatory capacity—psychological distress may result.

Conflicts and Resolution Mechanisms

Internal conflict is inevitable within Freud’s model, as the three components frequently make incompatible demands. The id seeks immediate gratification regardless of consequences, the superego demands moral perfection without compromise, and the ego attempts to satisfy both while adhering to the constraints of reality. As Anna Freud noted, “The ego serves three severe masters… the external world, the superego and the id” (A. Freud, 1936).

Common conflicts include:

• Id versus superego: The tension between instinctual desires and moral prohibitions
• Id versus ego: The pressure of immediate gratification against realistic considerations
• Superego versus ego: The conflict between idealised standards and practical limitations
• Reality versus internal demands: External constraints opposing psychological needs

The ego employs various strategies to resolve these conflicts, including:

• Postponement of gratification until appropriate circumstances
• Sublimation of problematic impulses into socially acceptable activities
• Compromise formations that partially satisfy competing demands
• Selective awareness that prioritises manageable aspects of conflicts

When these strategies prove insufficient and anxiety becomes overwhelming, the ego may resort to less adaptive mechanisms to manage psychological discomfort.

Defence Mechanisms

Among the most enduring and clinically useful aspects of Freudian theory are the defence mechanisms—unconscious psychological strategies employed by the ego to protect itself from anxiety arising from unacceptable id impulses, superego demands, or painful realities. First articulated by Freud and later elaborated by his daughter Anna Freud (1936), these mechanisms operate largely outside awareness to maintain psychological equilibrium.

Common defence mechanisms include:

• Repression: The basic mechanism of pushing threatening thoughts, feelings, or memories into the unconscious
• Denial: Refusing to acknowledge painful aspects of reality
• Projection: Attributing one’s own unacceptable impulses to others
• Rationalisation: Constructing plausible but incorrect explanations for behaviour
• Reaction formation: Adopting attitudes and behaviours opposite to unacceptable impulses
• Displacement: Redirecting emotions from their original object to a safer substitute
• Sublimation: Transforming unacceptable impulses into socially valued activities

Consider a student who feels intense anger toward a professor after receiving a poor mark. The id generates the impulse to express this anger directly, while the superego condemns such disrespect toward authority. This conflict produces anxiety, prompting defensive operations. The student might unconsciously employ:

• Displacement (directing anger toward a roommate instead)
• Rationalisation (explaining the poor mark as evidence of the professor’s incompetence)
• Sublimation (channelling frustration into increased study effort)
• Reaction formation (expressing exaggerated respect and admiration for the professor)

These mechanisms serve adaptive functions by reducing anxiety and maintaining self-esteem, but they may become problematic when relied upon excessively or rigidly, as they distort reality and consume psychological energy.

Freud’s Analogies

To elucidate the relationships between these abstract psychological constructs, Freud employed several memorable analogies. Perhaps most famous is his comparison of the id-ego relationship to a horse and rider:

“The ego is like a man on horseback, who has to hold in check the superior strength of the horse… Often a rider, if he is not to be parted from his horse, is obliged to guide it where it wants to go; so in the same way the ego is in the habit of transforming the id’s will into action as if it were its own” (Freud, 1923).

This analogy captures several key aspects of the relationship:

• The id (horse) provides the energy and power for movement
• The ego (rider) offers direction and control
• The ego’s control is always tenuous and partial
• Sometimes the ego must accommodate the id’s impulses rather than fully restraining them
• Without the id’s energy, the personality would lack motivation and drive

Another analogy Freud employed was that of the ego as a constitutional monarch—possessing formal authority but ultimately dependent on the support of more powerful forces. These analogies highlight the ego’s paradoxical position: tasked with executive authority yet dependent on energies and constrained by demands beyond its control.

Practical Examples of Component Interactions

The interactions between id, ego, and superego manifest in countless daily situations:

A professional receives an unfair criticism from a manager during a team meeting. The id generates an impulse for immediate angry retaliation, while the superego condemns both the expression of anger toward authority and the narcissistic wound of being criticised. The ego must manage this conflict, perhaps by:

• Temporarily suppressing the emotional reaction during the meeting (ego controlling id)
• Planning a private, professional discussion with the manager later (ego finding realistic solution)
• Self-soothing by recalling past successes (ego managing superego criticism)
• Consulting colleagues for perspective on the situation (ego reality-testing)

A student contemplates whether to attend a social gathering the night before an important examination. The id desires the immediate pleasure of socialising, while the superego presents competing imperatives—the value of responsibility versus the importance of friendship. The ego evaluates realistic factors, including:

• The amount of preparation already completed
• The potential consequences of different choices
• Possible compromise solutions (attending briefly or suggesting alternative timing)
• The relative importance of competing goals

These examples illustrate how the three components interact in a fluid, ongoing process rather than as static entities. They also demonstrate that psychological health involves not the absence of conflict but rather the effective management of inevitable tensions between competing psychological forces.

The Concept of Ego Strength

Central to Freud’s understanding of psychological functioning is the concept of ego strength—the ego’s capacity to mediate effectively between id impulses, superego demands, and external reality. Ego strength reflects not the ego’s dominance over other components but rather its flexible yet resilient management of the personality system as a whole.

Individuals with good ego strength typically demonstrate:

• Frustration tolerance and the ability to delay gratification
• Realistic perception and assessment of situations
• Adaptive regulation of emotional responses
• Flexible use of defence mechanisms appropriate to circumstances
• Capacity to maintain functioning despite internal conflicts
• Resilience in the face of stress and challenge

In contrast, ego weakness may manifest as:

• Poor impulse control and difficulty delaying gratification
• Distorted perception of reality and situations
• Emotional dysregulation or inappropriate affect
• Rigid, primitive, or excessive use of defence mechanisms
• Compromised functioning when facing internal or external pressures

As Hartmann (1939) later emphasised in his expansion of ego psychology, ego strength is not innate but develops through successful adaptation to reality, with early childhood experiences playing a crucial role in this development. The concept remains clinically relevant, with ego strength serving as an important consideration in various therapeutic approaches and psychological assessments.

Understanding these complex interactions between the id, ego, and superego provides a sophisticated framework for analysing human behaviour, explaining internal conflicts, and conceptualising psychological development. While contemporary psychology has moved beyond many specific Freudian claims, the recognition of competing psychological forces operating at different levels of awareness continues to inform both theoretical understanding and clinical practice.

Psychological Health and Imbalance

Freud’s structural model provides a framework for understanding not only normal personality functioning but also psychological health and pathology. According to this perspective, psychological wellbeing depends largely on the balance between the three components and the ego’s capacity to mediate competing demands effectively.

Signs of a Balanced Personality

A well-balanced personality, within Freudian theory, reflects an optimal relationship between id, ego, and superego. While perfect balance remains theoretical, individuals with relatively healthy personality organisation typically display:

• Appropriate expression of needs and desires without impulsive excess
• Realistic perception and assessment of external circumstances
• Moral functioning that guides without excessive rigidity or punishment
• Capacity to tolerate anxiety without resorting to maladaptive defences
• Integration of pleasure-seeking with responsibility and ethical awareness
• Flexible adaptation to changing circumstances and challenges

For Freud, a healthy personality was not one free from conflict but rather one with a strong enough ego to manage inevitable conflicts productively. As he noted, “The ego’s relation to the id might be compared with that of a rider to his horse. The horse supplies the locomotive energy, while the rider has the privilege of deciding on the goal and of guiding the powerful animal’s movement” (Freud, 1933).

Consequences of Id Dominance

When the id exerts disproportionate influence over personality functioning, the individual may demonstrate poor impulse control and limited consideration of consequences or moral constraints. Freud associated id dominance with psychotic conditions in extreme cases, though milder manifestations appear in various forms of impulsivity and self-regulation difficulties.

Signs of problematic id dominance include:

• Difficulty delaying gratification of basic needs and desires
• Impulsive behaviour without consideration of consequences
• Limited tolerance for frustration or discomfort
• Emotional volatility and poor affect regulation
• Disregard for social norms and others’ needs when they conflict with personal desires
• Potential substance abuse or behavioural addictions seeking immediate pleasure

While healthy personality requires appropriate expression of id-driven needs, overwhelming id influence compromises the reality-testing and moral functions necessary for adaptive social functioning.

Consequences of Superego Dominance

Conversely, when the superego exerts excessive influence, the individual may experience harsh self-criticism, rigid moral standards, and difficulty experiencing pleasure without guilt. Freud associated superego dominance with neurotic conditions, particularly those involving excessive guilt, perfectionism, and self-punishment.

Indicators of problematic superego dominance include:

• Persistent guilt even when behaviour meets reasonable ethical standards
• Perfectionism and impossibly high personal standards
• Harsh self-criticism disproportionate to actual shortcomings
• Rigid adherence to rules without consideration of context
• Difficulty experiencing pleasure without feelings of unworthiness
• Tendency toward self-punishment and self-sabotage
• Excessive concern with others’ judgement and approval

Fenichel (1945) observed that an overly harsh superego often results from identifying with punitive parental figures, internalising their critical attitudes toward the child’s normal developmental needs and expressions.

Ego Weakness and Its Effects

Perhaps most significant for psychological health in Freud’s model is the strength or weakness of the ego in managing the competing demands of id, superego, and reality. Ego weakness manifests in various forms of psychological vulnerability and difficulty adapting to life’s challenges.

Consequences of ego weakness may include:

• Inability to mediate effectively between competing psychological demands
• Overreliance on primitive or rigid defence mechanisms
• Poor reality testing and distorted perception of situations
• Difficulty managing anxiety generated by internal conflicts
• Limited frustration tolerance and emotional regulation
• Compromised capacity for problem-solving under stress

As Anna Freud (1936) elaborated, ego weakness often results in either excessive expression of id impulses or rigid superego restrictions, as the ego lacks the strength to establish appropriate compromises between these forces.

Connection to Mental Health Conditions

Freud conceptualised many psychological disorders as reflections of particular imbalances in the structural model. While contemporary understanding of mental health conditions has evolved considerably, aspects of his framework continue to inform psychodynamic approaches to psychopathology.

Within this framework:

• Psychotic disorders may involve profound ego weakness with compromised reality testing and id dominance
• Obsessive-compulsive conditions often reflect superego dominance with rigid moral standards and ritualistic attempts to control anxiety
• Personality disorders may represent characteristic patterns of imbalance among the three systems
• Anxiety disorders can be understood as expressions of ego difficulty managing conflicts between id impulses and superego prohibitions
• Depressive conditions might involve a punitive superego turning aggression inward against the self

Modern psychodynamic theorists have refined these connections substantially. For instance, Kernberg (1975) developed a sophisticated model of borderline personality organisation emphasising primitive defences and problematic integration of self and object representations, while maintaining connections to Freud’s structural concepts.

Understanding psychological health and pathology through the lens of id, ego, and superego interactions provides a dimensional rather than categorical approach to mental health, recognising that everyone experiences some degree of internal conflict. The model’s emphasis on unconscious processes and internal psychological structures continues to complement more symptom-focused approaches to mental health, offering insight into underlying dynamics that may maintain problematic patterns even when their origins lie outside conscious awareness.

Modern Interpretations and Extensions

While Freud’s structural model originated in the early 20th century, it has continued to evolve through theoretical elaborations, clinical applications, and connections to contemporary psychological science. Various schools of thought have built upon, modified, or reinterpreted the concepts of id, ego, and superego, ensuring their continued relevance in understanding human psychology.

Ego Psychology

The school of ego psychology, pioneered by Anna Freud and developed further by Heinz Hartmann, Erik Erikson, and others, shifted focus from the id to the ego’s autonomous functions and adaptive capacities. This approach expanded significantly beyond Freud’s original formulation while maintaining the structural model as its foundation.

Anna Freud’s work on defence mechanisms in “The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence” (1936) elaborated the ego’s protective strategies, providing a more nuanced understanding of how the ego manages anxiety and internal conflict. Her contributions emphasised the ego’s active role rather than portraying it merely as a mediator between other forces.

Hartmann (1939) introduced the concept of the “conflict-free ego sphere”—aspects of ego functioning that develop independently of conflict with the id. His work on adaptation and ego autonomy highlighted:

• The ego’s innate capacities for perception, attention, memory, and motor control
• Development of secondary autonomy through neutralisation of instinctual energy
• Adaptive functioning that serves both conflict management and environmental mastery
• The ego’s role in establishing a stable sense of self and reality

These elaborations preserved the structural model while expanding its explanatory power beyond conflict management to encompass normal development and adaptive functioning.

Object Relations and Self Psychology

Object relations theory, associated with theorists like Melanie Klein, W.R.D. Fairbairn, and D.W. Winnicott, shifted focus from drives to relationships as the primary motivational force in psychological development. While sometimes framed as a departure from Freudian theory, object relations approaches can be understood as reinterpreting rather than rejecting the structural model.

In this perspective:

• The id becomes connected to early internalised object relationships rather than abstract instincts
• The ego develops through integration of split self and object representations
• The superego incorporates internalised relationships with parental figures

Kohut’s self psychology similarly reframed Freudian concepts, focusing on narcissism and self-cohesion rather than drive conflict. His approach reconceptualised the traditional structural model by emphasising:

• Development of a cohesive self-structure through appropriate empathic responses
• Transformation of primitive narcissism rather than its repression
• The role of selfobjects in maintaining psychological equilibrium

While these approaches shifted emphasis considerably, they maintained connections to the original structural model through their focus on internal psychological structures, unconscious processes, and developmental progression.

Transactional Analysis Connections

Eric Berne’s Transactional Analysis (TA) represents one of the most accessible modern adaptations of Freud’s structural model. Berne (1961) simplified and reframed the id, ego, and superego as three ego states:

• The Child (corresponding roughly to the id): Emotional, spontaneous, creative aspects that contain both natural impulses and adaptations to early experiences
• The Adult (corresponding to the rational ego): Objective, data-processing aspects that make decisions based on current reality
• The Parent (corresponding to the superego): Internalised parental messages, values, and critical or nurturing attitudes

This adaptation preserved the essential interactive dynamics of Freud’s model while making it more accessible for clinical practice and educational settings. TA’s analysis of “transactions” between ego states in interpersonal interactions provided practical applications of structural concepts to everyday social exchanges, expanding the model’s utility beyond intrapsychic processes to interpersonal dynamics.

Neuropsychoanalytic Perspectives

Recent decades have seen attempts to integrate psychoanalytic concepts with neuroscientific understanding. Neuropsychoanalysis, associated with researchers like Mark Solms and Jaak Panksepp, seeks to identify neural correlates of psychoanalytic constructs, including the structural model components.

Preliminary connections include:

• Id functions related to subcortical systems, particularly limbic and brainstem structures involving basic drives and emotions
• Ego functions corresponding to prefrontal cortical regions involved in executive control, working memory, and decision-making
• Superego functions potentially linked to regions involved in social cognition, moral reasoning, and self-referential processing

Solms (2018) argues that these connections do not reduce psychoanalytic concepts to neural activity but rather provide complementary levels of explanation, enriching both neuroscience and psychoanalysis through their integration.

Dual-Process Models in Modern Psychology

Contemporary cognitive and social psychology has developed dual-process models that, while emerging from different traditions, share notable similarities with Freud’s distinction between primary and secondary process thinking in the id and ego.

These models typically distinguish between:

• System 1: Fast, automatic, emotional, stereotypic, and unconscious processes
• System 2: Slow, effortful, logical, calculating, and conscious processes

As noted by Epstein (1994) and later Kahneman (2011), these distinctions echo psychoanalytic concepts while framing them in terms more amenable to experimental investigation. Research on implicit cognition, automatic processing, and the interplay between emotional and rational decision-making continues to find parallels with psychoanalytic intuitions about the complex, multi-layered nature of mental processes.

These modern extensions and reinterpretations demonstrate the continuing influence and adaptability of Freud’s structural model. While contemporary psychology has moved beyond many specific Freudian claims, the core insight—that human psychology involves dynamic interactions between different mental systems, often operating outside awareness—remains a productive framework for understanding personality, development, and psychological functioning.

Critical Evaluation

Any thorough examination of Freud’s structural model must include critical assessment of its empirical standing, limitations, contemporary relevance, and alternatives. While the model has demonstrated remarkable longevity and influence, it has also faced substantial criticism from various perspectives within psychology.

Empirical Evidence

The empirical status of Freud’s structural model presents a complex picture, with several lines of evidence offering partial support:

• Research on unconscious processes has confirmed Freud’s fundamental insight that much of mental life operates outside awareness, with studies of implicit cognition, subliminal processing, and implicit memory supporting the notion of unconscious mental operations (Westen, 1998)
• Studies of defence mechanisms have provided empirical validation for specific defence processes first described within the structural model, with research supporting both their existence and their role in managing anxiety and maintaining psychological equilibrium (Cramer, 2000)
• Developmental research has documented patterns of self-regulation, moral development, and impulse control that parallel, though not precisely match, the developmental trajectory Freud proposed for id, ego, and superego (Emde et al., 1991)
• Clinical case studies continue to demonstrate patterns consistent with the model’s predictions regarding intrapsychic conflict, defence, and symptom formation in certain presentations

However, direct empirical validation of the structural model as a comprehensive theory faces significant methodological challenges, as the constructs themselves are not directly observable and were developed primarily through clinical observation rather than experimental methods.

Limitations and Criticisms

Critics have identified several substantial limitations in Freud’s structural model:

• Falsifiability problems: As noted by philosopher Karl Popper, psychoanalytic theories often resist falsification by accommodating contradictory evidence through additional explanations, limiting their scientific status (Popper, 1963)
• Methodological concerns: Freud’s theory development relied primarily on case studies with limited controls, raising questions about confirmation bias, generalisability, and alternative explanations for observed phenomena
• Cultural and historical biases: The content and structure of the theory reflect Western, specifically Victorian-era, assumptions about sexuality, family structure, and gender roles that may limit its cross-cultural applicability (Cushman, 1995)
• Overemphasis on sexuality and aggression: Critics argue that Freud’s focus on sexual and aggressive drives as primary motivational forces oversimplifies human motivation, neglecting other important drives like attachment, exploration, and mastery
• Gender bias: Feminist critics have highlighted problematic aspects of Freud’s theory regarding female development and psychology, arguing that it pathologises normal female development and reinforces patriarchal assumptions (Horney, 1967)

These limitations have led many academic psychologists to view the structural model as primarily of historical interest rather than as a current scientific framework.

Contemporary Relevance

Despite these criticisms, elements of the structural model continue to influence contemporary psychological practice:

• Psychodynamic therapies maintain modified versions of these concepts in understanding intrapsychic conflict, defence, and the therapeutic relationship
• The concept of unconscious processes has been integrated into multiple therapeutic modalities, including cognitive-behavioural approaches that address “automatic thoughts” and schema-focused therapies
• The model’s emphasis on developmental progression and early experience continues to inform developmental psychology and child intervention approaches
• Defence mechanisms remain clinically useful concepts for understanding how individuals manage difficult emotions and experiences

As Westen (1998) notes, while many specific Freudian hypotheses have not been supported, core insights about unconscious processing, psychological defence, and internal conflict have found support in various forms across psychological research.

Alternative Models

Contemporary psychology offers several alternative frameworks for understanding personality:

• Trait models, such as the Five-Factor Model, conceptualise personality in terms of relatively stable dimensions like extraversion, neuroticism, and conscientiousness (Costa & McCrae, 1992)
• Cognitive-behavioural approaches emphasise learned patterns of thinking and behaviour rather than unconscious structures, focusing on observable behaviour and accessible cognitions
• Humanistic models, associated with theorists like Rogers and Maslow, emphasise self-actualisation, personal growth, and conscious experience rather than unconscious conflict
• Biological and evolutionary approaches examine personality through the lens of genetic influences, neurochemistry, and adaptive functions of behavioural tendencies
• Sociocultural perspectives highlight the role of cultural context, social learning, and interpersonal relationships in personality development

While these alternatives address some limitations of Freud’s model, many contemporary approaches to personality incorporate multiple perspectives, recognising that different models may capture different aspects of human psychology and that integration often provides the most comprehensive understanding.

The continuing dialogue between Freudian concepts and alternative models reflects both the limitations of the structural model as a comprehensive scientific theory and its enduring contribution to psychological thinking about the complexities of human personality.

Conclusion

Freud’s structural model of personality, with its conceptualisation of the id, ego, and superego, represents one of the most influential frameworks in the history of psychological theory. Though developed a century ago, its core insights continue to resonate in both theoretical discussions and clinical applications, offering a vocabulary for understanding the complex, often contradictory aspects of human personality and behaviour.

Throughout this examination, several key points have emerged:

• The id functions as the primitive, pleasure-seeking component of personality, operating according to primary process thinking and providing the motivational energy that drives behaviour
• The ego serves as the executive function, mediating between the demands of the id, the prohibitions of the superego, and the constraints of external reality through secondary process thinking
• The superego embodies internalised moral standards and ideals, functioning as an inner critic and moral compass that evaluates thoughts and actions against internalised values
• The dynamic interactions between these components, rather than any single element in isolation, shape personality functioning and psychological health
• Psychological wellbeing depends significantly on the ego’s capacity to effectively balance competing demands, while many psychological difficulties reflect specific patterns of imbalance

While the scientific status of these concepts remains contested, with critics highlighting limitations in empirical validation, falsifiability, and cultural bias, the structural model’s influence extends far beyond its strict empirical standing. As Mitchell and Black (1995) observe, Freud’s ideas have permeated Western cultural understanding of the self, providing an enduring vocabulary for discussing internal conflict, unconscious motivation, and psychological defence.

For contemporary psychology students, understanding Freud’s structural model offers several significant benefits:

• It provides historical context for the development of psychological theory, illustrating how theoretical frameworks evolve through clinical observation, theoretical refinement, and critical evaluation
• It introduces fundamental concepts about psychological conflict and defence that continue to inform various therapeutic approaches, even those that have moved beyond strictly Freudian frameworks
• It offers a sophisticated vocabulary for discussing the complexity of human motivation, recognising that behaviour often reflects competing influences rather than singular causes
• It demonstrates the value of theoretical models that address psychological processes operating outside conscious awareness, an insight supported by contemporary research in cognitive and social psychology

As Westen (1999) argues, the most productive approach to Freud’s legacy is neither uncritical acceptance nor wholesale dismissal, but rather careful evaluation of specific claims and concepts against available evidence. The structural model’s greatest contribution may be its recognition of the multi-layered, dynamic nature of personality—a perspective that continues to enrich our understanding of human psychology even as specific details of the theory have been modified or superseded.

For students developing their own understanding of personality and psychological functioning, Freud’s structural model offers not a final answer but rather a compelling beginning point—a theoretical framework that, despite its limitations, captures something essential about the complexity, internal conflict, and dynamic nature of human psychological experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Id, Ego, and Superego?

The id, ego, and superego are the three components of personality in Sigmund Freud’s structural model. The id is the primitive, unconscious part of personality driven by basic desires and the pleasure principle. The ego is the realistic mediator that balances the id’s demands with external reality, operating on the reality principle. The superego is the moral component that incorporates internalised parental and societal standards, functioning as conscience and ego-ideal. These three elements interact continuously to influence behaviour, thoughts, and emotions, with psychological health depending on their relative balance.

Who Created the Id, Ego, and Superego Theory?

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), the founder of psychoanalysis, created the theory of id, ego, and superego. He formally introduced this structural model in his 1923 text “The Ego and the Id,” though the concepts developed gradually through his clinical work and earlier theoretical writings. This model represented a significant evolution from his previous topographical theory of conscious and unconscious mind. While Freud originated these concepts, they were later elaborated by his daughter Anna Freud and other psychoanalytic theorists who expanded and refined the understanding of these personality components.

What Is an Example of the Id, Ego, and Superego?

A classic example involves a hungry person walking past a bakery. The id impulse would say, “Take that cake immediately to satisfy your hunger!” without regard for consequences. The superego might respond, “Taking without paying is stealing and morally wrong.” The ego mediates by thinking, “I want the cake, but stealing is wrong and would have negative consequences. I’ll check if I have enough money to purchase it properly.” This demonstrates how the id focuses on immediate gratification, the superego enforces moral standards, and the ego finds realistic, socially acceptable ways to satisfy desires while respecting both reality and morality.

When Do the Id, Ego, and Superego Develop?

According to Freud, these three components develop at different stages of childhood. The id is present from birth, representing our innate instinctual drives and operating on the pleasure principle. The ego begins developing during the first two years of life as the infant learns to interact with the external environment and differentiate between self and others. The superego develops last, typically emerging between ages 3-5 during what Freud called the “phallic stage” of psychosexual development, as the child internalises parental values and moral standards through identification with the same-sex parent.

How Does the Ego Control the Id?

The ego controls the id through several mechanisms. It mediates between the id’s unconscious desires and external reality by employing the reality principle—postponing gratification until appropriate opportunities arise. The ego utilises secondary process thinking (logical, realistic reasoning) to develop plans for satisfying id impulses in socially acceptable ways. When direct satisfaction isn’t possible, the ego deploys various defence mechanisms to manage anxiety and protect the personality from overwhelming id impulses or superego demands. The strength of this control varies across individuals and situations, with ego strength representing the capacity to balance competing psychological forces effectively.

What Happens When the Id, Ego, and Superego Are Out of Balance?

An imbalance among these components can lead to various psychological difficulties. Id dominance may result in impulsivity, poor self-control, and potentially antisocial behaviour as immediate gratification overrides consideration of consequences or morality. Superego dominance can produce excessive guilt, harsh self-criticism, perfectionism, and rigid moral standards that create anxiety and inhibit normal pleasure. Ego weakness might manifest as poor reality testing, ineffective coping with stress, and difficulty mediating between competing internal demands. Freud associated various psychological conditions with specific patterns of imbalance, linking neuroses to superego dominance and psychoses to significant ego weakness and id dominance.

How Do Defence Mechanisms Relate to the Id, Ego, and Superego?

Defence mechanisms are unconscious psychological strategies employed by the ego to protect the personality from anxiety arising from conflicts among the id, superego, and external reality. When the id generates unacceptable impulses or the superego produces excessive guilt, the ego deploys defences like repression, denial, projection, or sublimation to reduce psychological distress. These mechanisms help maintain psychological equilibrium by keeping threatening content unconscious or transforming it into more acceptable forms. While adaptive in moderation, over-reliance on primitive or rigid defences can lead to psychological rigidity and symptoms, reflecting the ego’s struggle to manage internal conflicts effectively.

How Does the Structural Model Compare to Other Personality Theories?

Compared to other personality theories, Freud’s structural model emphasises unconscious processes and internal dynamic conflicts. Unlike trait theories (e.g., the Five-Factor Model) that focus on measurable personality dimensions, the structural model addresses underlying psychological processes and motivations. Cognitive-behavioural approaches concentrate on observable behaviours and conscious thoughts rather than unconscious structures. Humanistic theories emphasise conscious experience and self-actualisation over unconscious conflict. Biological models focus on genetic and neurochemical influences. Each approach offers different perspectives on personality, with Freud’s model distinguished by its emphasis on unconscious motivation, internal conflict, and developmental progression of psychological structures.

How Has the Id, Ego, and Superego Theory Influenced Modern Psychology?

Despite criticisms, the structural model has significantly influenced modern psychology in several ways. The concept of unconscious processing has been validated by contemporary research in implicit cognition and automatic processing. Defence mechanisms remain important in understanding psychological coping and symptom formation. The model’s emphasis on internal conflict informs various therapeutic approaches, including but not limited to psychodynamic therapies. Transactional Analysis adapted these concepts into more accessible Parent-Adult-Child ego states. The recognition that behaviour reflects multiple competing influences rather than single causes continues to inform sophisticated psychological models, with elements of Freud’s insights incorporated into integrative approaches to personality and psychopathology.

References

• Berne, E. (1961). Transactional Analysis in psychotherapy. Grove Press.
• Boag, S. (2014). Ego, drives, and the dynamics of internal objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 666.
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Cramer, P. (2000). Defense mechanisms in psychology today: Further processes for adaptation. American Psychologist, 55(6), 637-646.
• Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Addison-Wesley.
• Emde, R. N., Johnson, W. F., & Easterbrooks, M. A. (1991). The do’s and don’ts of early moral development: Psychoanalytic tradition and current research. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 245-277). University of Chicago Press.
• Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709-724.
• Fenichel, O. (1945). The psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Freud, A. (1936). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. International Universities Press.
• Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. The International Psycho-Analytical Press.
• Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. The International Psycho-Analytical Press.
• Freud, S. (1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Gay, P. (1998). Freud: A life for our time. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. International Universities Press.
• Horney, K. (1967). Feminine psychology. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Jason Aronson.
• Mitchell, S. A., & Black, M. J. (1995). Freud and beyond: A history of modern psychoanalytic thought. Basic Books.
• Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge.
• Solms, M. (2018). The scientific standing of psychoanalysis. BJPsych International, 15(1), 5-8.
• Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 333-371.
• Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47(4), 1061-1106.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

• Eagle, M. N. (2011). From classical to contemporary psychoanalysis: A critique and integration. Routledge.
• Erdelyi, M. H. (2006). The unified theory of repression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 499-511.
• Panksepp, J., & Solms, M. (2012). The “Id” knows more than the “Ego” admits: Neuropsychoanalytic and primal consciousness perspectives on the interface between affective and cognitive neuroscience. Brain Sciences, 2(2), 147-175.

Suggested Books

• Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2003). Psychoanalytic theories: Perspectives from developmental psychopathology. Whurr Publishers.
  • Provides a comprehensive overview of psychoanalytic theories with particular emphasis on how they relate to developmental psychology and psychopathology. Especially valuable for students seeking to understand Freud’s structural model in relation to contemporary research.
• Brown, J. A. C. (2021). Freud and the political. Routledge.
  • Examines Freud’s concepts including the structural model from a sociopolitical perspective, offering insight into the broader cultural implications and applications of psychoanalytic theory beyond clinical contexts.
• Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Harvard University Press.
  • A seminal work that traces the evolution of psychoanalytic theory from Freud’s drive/structure model to object relations approaches, providing essential context for understanding how the structural model has been reinterpreted and modified.

Recommended Websites

• The International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA)
  • Offers scholarly resources, publications, and educational materials about psychoanalytic concepts including Freud’s structural model. Features articles by leading contemporary psychoanalytic thinkers who continue to develop and apply these concepts.
• The British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC)
  • Provides educational resources, reading lists, and information about psychoanalytic theory and practice in the UK context. Includes sections on theoretical foundations and contemporary applications of psychoanalytic concepts.
• The Society for Psychoanalytic Psychology (Division 39 of the American Psychological Association)
  • Features articles, educational resources, and webinars examining psychoanalytic concepts including the structural model. Particularly useful for students interested in the integration of psychoanalytic ideas with contemporary psychological research and practice.

Download this Article as a PDF

Download this article as a PDF so you can revisit it whenever you want. We’ll email you a download link.

You’ll also get notification of our FREE Early Years TV videos each week and our exclusive special offers.

Get your PDF Download and FREE Early Years TV Updates

To cite this article use:

Early Years TV Id, Ego & Superego: Definition & Examples. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/id-ego-superego (Accessed: 30 April 2025).

Kathy Brodie

Kathy Brodie is an Early Years Professional, Trainer and Author of multiple books on Early Years Education and Child Development. She is the founder of Early Years TV and the Early Years Summit.

Kathy’s Author Profile